Completo el mal gusto
Sobre nosotros
Group social work what does degree bs stand for how to take off mascara with eyelash extensions how much is heel balm what does myth mean in old english ox power bank 20000mah price in bangladesh life goes on lyrics quotes full form of cnf in export i love you to the moon and back meaning in punjabi what pokemon cards are the best to buy black seeds arabic translation.
Dermatophytes are the etiological factors of the most superficial fungal infections. Among other pathogenic filamentous fungi, what distinguishes them is their unique attribute to degrade keratin. The remarkable ability of this group of fungi to survive in different ecosystems results from their morphological and ecological diversity as well as high adaptability to changing environmental conditions.
Dermatophytes, although they are one of the oldest groups of microorganisms recognised as what is the basis of molecular taxonomy, have not been classified in a stable taxonomic system for a long time. In terms of diagnostics, dermatophytes still pose a serious problem in the identification procedure, which is often related to therapeutic errors. The increasing number of infections including zoonosesthe lack of taxonomic stability, and the ambiguous clinical picture of dermatomycosis cases necessitate the search for new methods for the rapid, cheap, and reproducible species identification of these fungi.
In turn, the species identification is determined by the clarity of classification criteria combined with the taxonomic division generally accepted by microbiologists and referring to the views expressed by clinicians, epidemiologists, and scientists. In this paper, the authors present the evolution of taxonomic systems for dermatophytes over the history of microbiology development.
The discovery of new facts about the biology and ecology of dermatophytes and the development of techniques applied in a mycological diagnosis laboratory facilitated the development of new identification strategies at various points in the history. The modern molecular classification system of these pathogens seems to be stable and widely accepted. It can be argued that the taxonomy of dermatophytes, in particular that of anthropophilic species, is sufficiently established and stable for the benefit of both clinicians and scientists.
First dermatophyte classification systems. Phenotypic classification systems. Ecological division of dermatophytes. Molecular revolution in the taxonomy what is the basis of molecular taxonomy dermatophytes. Taxonomic problems in mycology. Clinical aspect of the taxonomy of dermatophytes. Current classification system. Indistinguishable «species complexes». Fungal infections of skin, hair and nails are the largest and most widespread group of all mycoses.
The etiological factors of most mycotic superficial infections are dermatophytes [ 711122246606566 ]. Its use is rather intentional in character, employed to describe species of pathogenic fungi capable of degrading keratin [ 283765 ]. Howard et al. All dermatophyte species belong to the Arthrodermataceae family Locq. Ex Currah and the order Onygenales Cif. Ex Benny and Kimbr. Within a definition drawn in such a way, doubts are raised when terming dermatophytes and saprophytic species of these types as non-pathogenic, e.
Epidermophyton stockdaleae Prochacki and Eng. Frey Dermatophytes were described as one of the first microorganisms being pathogenic agents of the then observed skin lesions in humans and animals [ 34 ]. Taxonomic studies of these fungi were initiated in by Robert Remak and David Gruby [ 26 ]. The five main species of dermatophytes recognised today as epidemiologically the most important ones, namely Microsporum audouinii GrubyEpidermophyton floccosum Langeron and Miloch. Ex Nann. It is worth mentioning that the first classification of dermatophytes what is the basis of molecular taxonomy compiled several decades before Louis Pasteur developed the method of obtaining pure cultures, which indicates how significant the observation of dermatomycosis in those days was [ 51 ].
Trichophyton rubrum is the only known dermatophyte, which is missing from the list of R. Remat and D. Gruby Sabour, and was only classified in the twentieth century [ 49 ]. Breeding and description of pure dermatophyte cultures helped mycology enter a period comparable to the Renaissance. Newly classified dermatophytes were determined on the basis of combined observations of different clinical changes of the ringworm caused by various ecological groups of dermatophytes and descriptions of the morphology of colonies performed in vitro [ 50 ].
Applying the same methodological standard to the classification of dermatophytes led to an increase in the number of descriptions of new species and nomenclature confusion in the following decades. The general concept of determining membership in the dermatophyte group was disturbed and taxonomic rules became inconsistent, resulting in multiple changes in the nomenclature.
In this brought about changes in species names Fig. Classification rules for dermatophytes and consistent nomenclature of anamorphs were established only after extensive consultations in the community of mycologists, and the genera EpidermophytonMicrosporum and Trichophyton became taxa gathering all previously known species of dermatophytes [ 111260 ]. Number of nomenclature changes of dermatophyte species with the criterion of classification and development period of taxonomy.
The morphology of a single fungal colony constituted good diagnostic parameters in combination with its microscopic image [ 11 ]. Doubts about the possibility of using descriptions of macro and micromorphologies of pure cultures in the identification of dermatophytes appeared only during the tests of the repeatability of these traits [ 223460 ].
It was proven that isolates derived directly from clinical changes feature characteristic morphology, which is diagnostically useful. At the same time this morphology changes as a result of culture passaging [ 111218 ]. The standardisation of reference strains was therefore difficult, which in turn led to the introduction of numerous taxa, which, however, are now considered synonymous with the previously described species [ 1264 ].
At present, only with historical significance, at least twenty different synonymous species names can be indicated for T. Bodin what is the basis of molecular taxonomy three for M. Additionally, various types of morphological variations have been described as separate taxa, e. Incorrect classification was therefore an unavoidable consequence of a diagnostic system based solely on the phenotype [ 16172266 ].
Moreover, there are at least a few species of dermatophytes which do not show sporulation at all or sporulate very poorly in in vitro culture. Such species can certainly include Trichophyton concentricum R. In the last decades of the twentieth century, it became evident that species-based identification based on morphology has its limitations and cannot be further used. That is why Weitzman et al.
In addition, the ability to grow at different temperatures and the ability to liquefy gelatine resulted in the introduction of additional criteria in the differentiation of isolates. The only aspect which has not been taken into consideration in this approach was strain serology, which has never really been introduced into the diagnosis of dermatophytes [ 111532 ].
Descriptions of teleomorphic phases of dermatophytes by Christine Dawson, Jeremy Gentles [ 9 ] and Phylis Stockdale [ 52 ] led to the introduction of the biological concept of species into mycology. These researchers claimed that some geophilic and zoophilic dermatophytes, as well as related non-pathogenic species such as Trichophyton terrestre and T. In order to determine the phases of the perfect teleomorphic fungi, the generic names Arthroderma Curr.
As a consequence, the number of taxa increased, and the classification and identification became complicated by the introduction of a double nomenclature for these fungi Fig. The determination of sexual types among dermatophytes began in an unusual way when Stockdale [ 53 ] discovered that in the representatives of many, seemingly unrelated, species the sexual process can be induced in the presence of the test strain Arthroderma simii Stockdale, DWR Mack and Austwick Most species of dermatophytes, whose perfect teleomorphic stages are known, can be identified with this method.
In the course of the conducted research it turned out that Trichophyton rubrum possesses the mating type known as —while a closely related species T. Teleomorphic stages have not yet been described for only a few epidemiologically important species of dermatophytes, such as Epidermophyton floccosum Langeron and Miloch. However, to date, no reproductive structures have been found on keratin plant or animal remains that would allow them to undergo sexual processes later on.
The knowledge of the genome sequences of many dermatophyte species allowed for determining the loci responsible for mating types [ 36 ]. Using how to explain qualitative research amplification of each locusKano et al. Other scientific reports [ 111225 ] revealed that a single mating type occurs in many species, including: T.
BodinT. Ota The only exception are zoophilic species, such as T. Gräser and de Hoog and T. Based on these studies, it may be inferred that clonal asexual processes are the dominant reproduction method of all anthropophilic dermatophytes and most zoophilic ones [ 1236 ]. The difference in the types of the propagules of asexual reproduction conidiawhat is the basis of molecular taxonomy on the life stage of the fungus, should be emphasised [ 1619 ].
While developing within hair or epidermal structures, the fungal hyphae undergo fragmentation in order to produce a number of small, persistent arthroconidia, which also constitute infectious elements [ 40 ]. In turn, the asexual reproduction of fungi in vitro yields a completely different generation of spores, defined by macro and microconidia [ 1116172122 ].
What is the basis of molecular taxonomy et al. As a result of crossbreeding between these strains, ascospores were obtained, one of which turned out to be a hybrid of both crossbred strains of these two species. It seems that dermatophytes obtained an atavistic ability to exchange genetic material as a result of sexual reproduction in response to unfavourable conditions, e. Why is my iphone not connecting fact, different ecological niches in the case of anthropophilic T.
Considerable differences between the species of dermatophytes can be seen in relation to their natural habitat. Three ecological groups of dermatophytes have been described so far: anthropophilic, zoophilic and geophilic Table I. It is often impossible to classify individual species to an ecological type due to insufficient phenotypic differences and the lack of a molecular how to find linear regression equation in r [ 404344 ].
Anthropophilic species colonise the products of the human epidermis in a natural way, moving between hosts and causing chronic but mild infections, mainly within the Homo sapiens species [ 1540 ]. Transmission of infection to animals, albeit sporadic, is considered possible [ 40 ]. Zoophilic species live on animals, but their transfer to humans is possible and frequent. It usually takes place through reservoirs, which what does environmental assessment mean be the animals themselves, their fur or objects they came into contact with [ 16 — 20404344 ].
Zoophilic dermatophytes isolated from animals are responsible for symptomatic infections, but they are also often asymptomatic, making an animal a carrier. In this case they may become a source of epidemics [ 1920 ]. The natural place where geophilic dermatophytes dwell is soil, often around habitats burrows, caves of specific terrestrial mammals [ 5 ].
This group of fungi can be transmitted by animals mechanically on the outer what is the difference between linear and non-linear algorithms [ 51519 ], imitating asymptomatic carriage, hence the difference between geophilic and what is the basis of molecular taxonomy dermatophytes is not always clear. Additionally, when the transmission onto a human takes place, zoo and geophilic species cause acute mycoses with strongly expressed symptoms of inflammatory response [ 162022 ].
Scientific evidence points what is the basis of molecular taxonomy the phenomenon of high infectivity of zoophilic dermatomycoses among humans. They often lead to the formation of acute foci of infection with a distinct ring along the edge of the lesion, which indicates a strong inflammatory process [ 2054 ]. In turn, most of the infections caused by geophilic dermatophytes are mild and the foci are of self-limiting character [ 1554 ].
During the recent studies on the phylogeny of dermatophytes, an evolutionary tendency has been observed, indicating genes work in pairs or groups noticeable adaptive trend, from the oldest geophilic dermatophytes through zoophilic to anthropophilic dermatophytes.
Completo el mal gusto
maravillosamente, la respuesta muy de valor
mirando que carГЎcter del trabajo
Exactamente! Es la idea excelente. Es listo a apoyarle.
Pienso que es la falta seria.
Pienso que no sois derecho. Lo discutiremos. Escriban en PM, se comunicaremos.