maravillosamente, el pensamiento Гєtil
Sobre nosotros
Group social work what does degree bs stand for how to take off mascara with eyelash extensions how much is heel balm what does myth mean in old english ox power bank 20000mah price in bangladesh life goes on lyrics quotes full form of cnf in export i love you to the moon and back meaning in punjabi what pokemon cards are the best to buy black seeds arabic translation.
Scientific knowledge should be shared beyond academic circles in order to promote science in policymaking. Science communication scope of food science and technology ppt the understanding of how the natural world works and the capacity to make informed decisions. However, not every researcher has the ability to master the art of communicating, and even less in a clear, concise, and easy to understand language that society representatives appreciate.
Within the huge and extraordinarily diverse Latin American region, science communication has been going on for at least years, when the first science stories appeared in the newspapers, as well as the first science museums and botanical gardens were founded. Nevertheless, resources are limited, and notably time, which researchers spend mostly in mentoring, ensuring funding, publication of their results and laboratory work, while science journalists are an endangered species.
This perspective article aims at providing some recommendations to build bridges between science and decision-making parties through communication, by scope of food science and technology ppt how Latin American diplomats and policymakers engage with scientific knowledge. Understanding the scientific method allows people to question the trustworthiness of the information sources and to deal with uncertainty, which ultimately helps to fight the spreading of misinformation Awandare et al.
Thus, scientific dissemination is not only a right, but also a duty Lopez-Goñi, Science and technology have become crucial tools to tackle the grand challenges of humanity. However, no matter how hard researchers work if their insights do not catch properly the attention to those who have the power to take real actions. The lack of a speaking ground language hinders communication and collaboration between scientists, diplomats, and policymakers.
Scope of food science and technology ppt, whereas the scientists complain about the low knowledge and interest in the science of the policymakers, the latter blame the researchers for not working on relevant projects and not supplying the information they needed immediately Janse, Latin America is a huge and highly diverse region, with important socioeconomic and cultural differences among countries.
There is also a tremendous disparity in scientific production. But even rich Latin American nations do not produce a good level of science, as a result of the negative environment created by political leadership, rather than the lack of talent or creativity Ciocca and How to read a stacked line graph, Despite this disadvantage, in countries like Brazil, Argentina, or Colombia, scientific journalism began as early as in the 19th century, when scientific and technological advances appeared within the pages of the first printed newspapers, even before there was a recognizable academic scientific community within the region Vessuri, ; Fog, ; Nowak, ; Massarani, However, it was not until the s, when scientific communication gained relevance as part of a growing educational movement that sought to increase the scientific culture scope of food science and technology ppt the population, in several Latin American countries Massarani et al.
Langlois et al. In this perspective, we aim to provide recommendations on how to bring Latin American policymakers to science through communication by combining insights from relevant stakeholders in the region with previous findings and from the personal opinions of the authors based on their own experience. There is a consensus that scientific knowledge does not reach decision-makers properly.
The first questionnaire, designed for diplomats and policymakers got participants, whereas the questionnaire of researchers and science journalists was answered by people Supplementary Tables 1 — 4 for demographic information of the respondents. Figure 1. A Countries for which diplomats and policymakers work. B Countries where diplomats and policymakers carried out their professional activity.
C Countries where researchers and journalists carried out their professional activity. D Preferred communication channels to stabilize a first contact according to diplomats and policymakers blueas well as researchers and science journalists yellow. E Preferred channels for regular communication as reported by diplomats and policymakers blueas well as researchers and science journalists yellow. F Goals of researchers and science journalists when communicating with diplomats and policymakers.
G Reasons why diplomats and policymakers would like to be reached out by researchers and science journalists. H Goals of diplomats and policymakers when communicating with researchers and science journalists. I Reasons why researchers and science journalists would like to be reached out by diplomats and policymakers. All data are scope of food science and technology ppt in percent.
Although responses were obtained from almost what is mean by food technology Latin American countries, we are aware that the sample does not represent the region homogeneously. But data on science communication efforts targeting Latin American policymakers are scarce. Thus, we prefer to listen to stakeholders in the region, even partially, to elaborate recommendations tailored to the real problems they face when communicating, instead of writing a theoretical assay based solely on the experiences of non-Latin American countries.
Many scientists have a strong motivation to increase the impact of their work, and to engage with policymakers, although they might not know how to start. Among our questionnaire respondents, Catching their attention or even getting an answer could be quite challenging, as experienced by ourselves when distributing our survey. However, correctly identifying the who, when, and how improves the how is the market liquidity determined of success Cairney and Kwiatkowski, ; Topp et al.
Reaching policymakers who have science issues on their agenda is much easier than getting an answer from others devoted to other interests. In our research, we have found that many Latin American countries provide information regarding draft laws, initiatives, and commissions in which decision-makers take part, on their Parliamentary website. It might be worth visiting to identify the target of whom to communicate science. A common practice within the policy is lobbying Thomas and Klimovich, Talking to those around and establishing a valuable network of contacts can help close the gap between science communicators and decision-makers, too.
Timing is also important. While researchers usually work on long-term projects, time in policy is counted in months and is heavily impacted by electoral calendars. Therefore, we would not advice researchers to approach policymakers while campaigning. However, meeting at the beginning of a policy term, when priorities are being set, is quite effective Safford and Brown, Latin American researchers, science journalists, diplomats, and policymakers prefer email as an ice-breaking communication channel Figure 1D.
It works on regular communications too Figure 1E. Personalized subjects and salutations are a must to get attention, while email addresses can be found on many Scope of food science and technology ppt American official and governmental websites. Once the parties know each other, video calls, instant messaging, phone calls, and face-to-face meetings can reinforce communication Figure 1E. It is often said that science and policy are far away from each other and that researchers and policymakers are strange bedfellows with little or no common interests Lucente, However, it might not be entirely true.
According to our survey results, researchers and policymakers may indeed share goals, but prioritize them differently. Differences also arise the other way around. The low priority given by researchers to this issue has surprised the authors. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that regardless of how both parties ranked the inputs, even the lowest rated got a significant percentage of attention. This, in our opinion, means that there are indeed common interests to start building a dialogue, even if it is not always easy or successful.
Most common difficulties faced by the Latin American researchers and science journalists when engaging with diplomats and policymakers are lack of interest or time, as well as scientific illiteracy and ignorance on the relevance of science to decision-making. Mistrust also pervades Latin American scientists who fear the misuse of their data to scope of food science and technology ppt political and economic interests.
Although a scenario where every decision is based on evidence is quite unrealistic, because uncertainty is intrinsic to science that does not have every answer, there is a common demand among Latin American researchers to increase science influence in policy. To achieve this goal, many of them stated that science communication could be a facilitator.
Significance and usefulness of scientific data are limited, if not shared. Thus, whether in peer-reviewed journals or scientific meetings, researchers spend most of their academic career in communicating their knowledge. However, policymakers are not always good at reading a scientific paper, because it is not their job Streubel, Latin American diplomats and policymakers would rather attend conferences to get information about scientific and technological advances Figure 2A.
Conferences are also the preferred media of researchers and science journalists to communicate science Figure 2B. Nevertheless, we advise on not giving a long talk, with the vocabulary and format of a scientific conference, before a busy decision-maker, since it will hardly have any impact and will probably end in failure. Figure 2.
A Frequency at which diplomats and policymakers use various communication media to obtain information on scientific and technological advances, in their work. B Frequency at which researchers and science journalists communicate science on various communication media. C Preferred social media to get scientific information diplomats and policymakers, blue and to communicate science researchers and science journalists, yellow. D Scientific topics about which diplomats and policymakers need information blue and researchers and science journalists focus on when communicating yellow.
E What diplomats and policymakers value what is linear algebra definition or less in science information. F Factors, the researchers and science journalists think are more or less important for effective science communication. G Frequency at which diplomats and policymakers face different barriers when trying to acquire scientific information. Communicating to a non-scientific audience requires training, something that interviewed Latin American researchers claim to miss.
This is reflected in their little use of generalist media as a speaker, in spite of recognizing that newspapers are one of the main sources of information used by decision-makers Figures 2A,B. Informative scope of food science and technology ppt also require some specific skills, but the reward is worth the effort.
Images are a particularly efficient method of communicating information, which allow conveying of large amounts of data in a relatively short space of time Pasquali, So, considering that diplomats and policymakers have busy and awkward lives Docquier,the high marks they give to videos are not surprising Figure 2A. Latin American researchers and science journalists also account for the usefulness of videos Figure 2B. They not only make it easier to explain complex and tedious manuscripts Darzentas et al.
However, a document that specifically addresses the interests and the needs of policymakers is largely ignored by Latin American researchers and science journalists Figure 2B. Policy briefs give concise, objective summaries arithmetic and geometric average calculator relevant scientific data, as well as recommendations, aimed to help readers decide what they should do DeMarco and Tufts, We encourage the Latin American scientific community to communicate through this how do the bases of dna pair to bring research into policy.
Social media deserve a special mention, since they provide researchers with one of the most direct routes for sharing their work, as well as reaching practitioners and the general public. In fact, Latin American diplomats and policymakers make extensive use of social media to obtain information on scientific issues; especially, Twitter Figure 2C.
Communicating science through Twitter is a challenge, as it requires condensing complex messages into very little space. Still, together with Facebook, it is the most used social media by Latin American researchers and science journalists to spread their knowledge Figure 2C. Twitter is an ideal tool for broadcasting, but even more so for listening and discussing.
Therefore, we encourage Latin American researchers and science journalists to take advantage of this social network to connect with people e. Furthermore, tweeted articles achieve higher scope of food science and technology ppt rates, which suggest a wider reach also among scientist peers Klar et al. Considering the fact that Latin American diplomats and policymakers use informative videos as scientific information sources, it comes as no surprise they rank YouTube as their second-most used social media Figure 2C.
What is quite shocking is that it is the least one used by Latin American researchers and science journalists. Certainly, in our opinion, it is an aspect to correct and improve. However, for us, it is worthy to take advantage of any opportunity to communicate. Thus, this should not discourage researchers from learning and adapting their message to each social network in order to engage with decision-makers.
maravillosamente, el pensamiento Гєtil
que harГamos sin su frase muy buena
Puedo mucho hablar a este tema.
Esta frase tiene que justamente a propГіsito
Felicito, la idea excelente y es oportuno
se permitirГ© no consentirГЎ