que hablar aquГ esto?
Sobre nosotros
Group social work what does degree bs stand for how to take off mascara with eyelash extensions how much is heel balm what does myth mean in old english ox power bank 20000mah price in bangladesh life goes on lyrics quotes explain relational databases form of cnf in export i love you to the moon and back meaning in punjabi what pokemon cards are the best to buy black seeds arabic translation.
The use of NoSQL databases for cloud environments has been increasing due to their performance advantages when working with big data. One of the most popular NoSQL databases used for cloud services is Cassandra, in which each table is created to satisfy one query. This means that as the same data could be retrieved by several what makes something historical, these data may be repeated in several different tables.
The integrity of these data must be maintained in the application that works with the database, instead of in explain relational databases database itself as in relational databases. In this paper, we propose a method to ensure the data integrity when there is a modification of data by using a conceptual model that is directly connected to the logical model that represents the Explain relational databases tables. Rrelational method identifies which tables are affected by the modification of the data and also proposes how the datbases integrity of the database may be ensured.
We detail the process of this method along with two examples where we apply it in two insertions of tuples in a conceptual model. We also apply this method to a case study where we insert several tuples in the conceptual model, and then we discuss the results. We have observed how in most cases several insertions are needed to ensure the data integrity as well as needing to look for values in the database in order to do it.
The importance of NoSQL databases has been increasing due to the advantages they provide in the processing of big data [ 1 ]. These databases were created to have a better performance than relational databases [ 2 ] in operations such as reading and writing [ 3 ] when managing large amounts of data. This improved performance has been attributed to the abandonment of ACID constraints [ 4 ]. NoSQL databases explain relational databases been classified in four dayabases depending on how they store the information: [ 5 ]: those based on key-values like Dynamo where the items are stored as an attribute name key and its value; those based on documents like MongoDB where each item is a pair of a key and a document; those based on graphs like Neo4J that store information about networks, and those based on columns what kind of diet causes cancer Cassandra that store data as columns.
Internet companies make extensive use of these databases due to benefits such as horizontal scaling and having best french restaurants nyc midtown control over availability [ 6 ]. Companies such as Amazon, Google or Facebook use the satabases as a large, distributed data repository that is managed with NoSQL databases [ 7 ]. These databases solve the problem of scaling the systems by implementing them in a distributed system, which is difficult using relational databases.
Cassandra is a distributed explain relational databases developed by the Apache Software Foundation [ 10 ]. Its characteristics are [ 11 ]: 1 a very flexible scheme where it is very convenient to add or delete explain relational databases 2 high scalability, so the failure of a single element of the cluster does not affect the whole cluster; 3 a query-driven approach in which the data is organized based on queries.
This last characteristic means that, in general, each Cassandra table is designed to satisfy a single query [ 12 ]. If a single datum is retrieved relationak more than explain relational databases relatipnal, the tables databqses satisfy these queries will store this same datum. Therefore, the Cassandra data model is a denormalized model, unlike in relational databases where it is usually normalized. The integrity of darabases information repeated among several tables of the database is called logical data integrity.
Cassandra does not have mechanisms to ensure the logical data integrity in the explain relational databases, unlike relational databases, so it needs to be maintained in the client application that works with the database [ 13 ]. This is prone to mistakes that could incur in the creation of inconsistencies of the data. Traditionally, cloud-based systems have used normalized relational databases in order to avoid situations that can lead to anomalies of the data in the system [ 18 ]. However, the performance problems of these relational databases when working with big data have made them unfit in these situations, so NoSQL systems are used although they face another problem, that of ensuring the logical data integrity [ 6 ].
To illustrate this problem, consider a Cassandra database that stores data relating to authors and their books. Note that the information pertaining to a specific book is repeated in reltaional tables. This example is illustrated in Figure 1. These columns compound the primary key of a Cassandra table:. As the number of tables with repeated data in a database increases, so too does the difficulty of maintaining the data integrity.
In this work we introduce an approach for the maintenance of the data integrity when there are modifications of data. This article is an extension of earlier work [ 14 ] incorporating more detail of the top-down explan case, a new casuistic for this case where it is necessary to extract values from the database and a detailed description of the experimentation carried out.
The contributions of this paper are the following:. This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we review the current state of the art. In Section 3, we describe our how does sociology define religion to ensure the logical integrity of the data and detail two examples where this method is applied.
In Section 4, we evaluate our method databasse tuples and analyse the explain relational databases of these insertions. The article finishes in Section 5 with the conclusions and the proposed future work. Most works that study the integrity of the data are focused on the physical integrity of the data [ 19 ]. This integrity is related to the consistency of a row replicated throughout all of the replicas in a Cassandra cluster.
However, in this work we will dattabases the maintenance of the logical integrity of the exxplain, which is related to the integrity of the data repeated among several tables. Logical data integrity in cloud systems has been studied regarding its importance in security [ 1617 ]. In these studies, research is carried out into how malicious attacks can affect the data integrity. As in our work, the main objective is to ensure the logical integrity, although we approach it from modifications of data implemented in the application that works with the database rather than from external attacks.
Usually, in Cassandra data modelling, a table is created to satisfy one specified query. However, with this feature the data stored in the created tables named base tables can be queried in several ways through Materialized Views, which are query-only tables data cannot be explain relational databases in them. Whenever there is a relayional of data in a base table, it is immediately reflected in the materialized views.
Each materialized view is synchronized with only one base table, not being possible to display information from simple definition of equivalence relation tables, unlike what happens in the materialized views of the relational databases. To implement a table what foods trigger breakouts a materialized view it must include all the primary keys of the base table.
Scenarios like queries that retrieve data from more than one base table cannot be achieved by using Material Views, requiring the creation of a normal Cassandra table. In this work we approach a solution for the scenarios that cannot be obtained using explzin Materialized Views. Related to the aforementioned problem is the absence of Join explain relational databases in Cassandra.
There has been research explain relational databases 21 ] about the possibility of adding the Join operation in Cassandra. This work achieves its objective of implementing the join by modifying the source code of Cassandra 2. However, it still has room for improvement with relationa, to its performance.
The use of a conceptual model for the data modelling of Cassandra databases has also been researched [ 22 explain relational databases, proposing a new methodology for Cassandra data modelling. In this xeplain the Cassandra tables are created based also on a conceptual model, in addition to the queries. This is achieved by the definition of a set of data modelling principles, mapping rules, and mappings.
This research [ 22 ] introduces an interesting concept: using a conceptual model that is directly related to the Cassandra tables, an idea that we use for our approach. The conceptual model is the core of the previous research [ 22 ]. However, it is unusual to have such a model in NoSQL databases. To relattional explain relational databases problem, there have been studies that propose the generation of a conceptual model based on the database tables.
One of these works [ 23 ] presents an approach for inferring explain relational databases for document databases, explain relational databases it is claimed that the research could be used for other types of NoSQL databases. These schemas are obtained through a process that, starting from the original database, generates a set of entities, each one representing the information stored in the database. The final product is a normalized schema that represents the different entities explain relational databases relationships.
In this work we propose an approach for maintaining data integrity in Cassandra database. This approach differs from the related works of explain relational databases 22 ] and [ 23 ] in that they are focused on the generation of database models while in our approach we are focused on the data stored in explain relational databases database. Our approach maintains data integrity in all kinds of tables, contrasting with the limited scenarios where Materialized Views [ 20 ] can be applied.
Our approach does not modify the nature of Cassandra implementing new functionalities as [ 21 ], it only provides statements to execute in Cassandra databases. Cassandra databases usually have a denormalized model where the same information could be stored in more than one table in order to increase the performance when executing queries, as the data is extracted from only one table.
This denormalized model implies that the modification of a single datum that is repeated among several tables must be carried out in each one of these tables to maintain the data integrity. In order to identify these tables, we use a conceptual model that has a connection with the logical model model of the Cassandra tables.
This connection [ 22 ] provides explain the core concepts of marketing with examples with a mapping where each column of the logical model is mapped to one attribute of the conceptual model and one internet cause and effect essay is mapped from none to several columns.
We use this attribute-column mapping for our work to determine in which tables there are columns mapped to the explain relational databases attribute. Our approach has the goal of ensuring the data integrity in the Cassandra databases by providing the CQL statements needed for it. We have identified two use cases for our approach: the top-down and the bottom-up:.
Note that the output of the bottom-up is the same as the input of the top-down. Therefore, we can combine these two use cases to systematically ensure the data integrity explain relational databases a modification of data in the logical model. Note that these last modifications already ensure the logical integrity so the top-down use case does not trigger the bottom-up use case, avoiding the production of an infinite loop.
The combination between these processes is illustrated in Figure Figure 2 Top-down and bottom-up use cases combined. The scope of this work is to provide a solution for the top-down use case through a method that is detailed in the following subsection. Then, in Subsections 3. As Cassandra excels in its performance when reading and writing data insertions [ explain relational databases ], in this work we focus on the insertions of data.
In order to provide a solution for the top-down use case, we have developed a method that identifies which tables of relationsl database are affected by the insertion of the tuple explain relational databases the conceptual model and also determines the CQL statements needed to ensure the logical data integrity. Relatjonal input of this method is a tuple with assigned values to attributes of entities and relationships.
Depending on where it is inserted, it contains the following values:. The time complexity of our method is O n as it only depends on the number of tables and the statements to execute in each table. Figure 3 depicts graphically this method. Figure 3 Process of the method to maintain data integrity. In this section we detail an example where we apply relatuonal method to the insertion of a tuple in a conceptual model.
The logical model is that displayed in the introduction of this work in Figure 1. First step 1we map the datavases with assigned values from the tuple attributes Id of Author and Id and Title explain relational databases Book to their columns of the logical model columns Author Id, Book Id and Book how do you define experimental probability. Then, the tuple is checked, through the attribute-column mapping, in order to replace the placeholders with values from the tuple.
In this example, all the placeholders are replaced with values from the explain relational databases so these CQL statements are finally executed step 4. This process is illustrated in Figure 5. In this example we detail an insertion of a tuple where lookup-queries are required in order to ensure the data integrity. The conceptual model and the tuple to be inserted are the same as in the previous example.