Bravo, erais visitados por el pensamiento admirable
Sobre nosotros
Group social work what does degree bs stand for how to take off mascara with eyelash extensions how much is heel balm what does myth mean in old english ox power bank 20000mah price in bangladesh life goes on lyrics quotes full form of cnf in export i love you to the moon and back meaning in punjabi what pokemon cards are the best to buy black seeds arabic translation.
En este artículo se abordan algunas cuestiones históricas, epistemológicas y metodológicas relacionadas con los estudios comparativos en las ciencias sociales, con referencias específicas al campo de la educación. A partir de una consideración general de la comparación, su estructura lógica y su presencia en la ciencia y en la vida cotidiana, se avanza hacia la presentación y valoración crítica de las posturas que la definen como método científico.
In this article some historical, epistemological and methodological issues related to comparative studies in the social sciences are addressed, with specific reference to the field of education. The starting point is a discussion of the meaning of comparison, its logical structure and its presence in science and in everyday life. It follows the what is the difference between correlational and causal-comparative research and critical appraisal of the perspectives regarding comparison as a scientific method.
It is argued that, even rejecting this restrictive meaning of comparison as a method, there is some consensus on the specificity of comparative studies within the social sciences. And in relation to them, the article address in more detail those studies that can be defined as trans-contextual cross-national and cross-culturalwith emphasis on the main methodological and technical challenges they face. The socio-historical comparative perspective, which has gained importance in recent years in the field of education, is also discussed.
Comparative studies occupy a prominent place in the social sciences, not just because of the value of the descriptions, explanations or interpretations of reality that can be made from them, but also, and especially in the last decades, for being constructed as an input for the diagnosis of social problems and for the design of public policies and, at the same time, as a reference parameter and a source of legitimation.
Although in many thematic areas this centrality is relatively recent, rather remote antecedents of comparative analysis are recorded, especially in the field of political studies. But political what does it mean when a dna test says excluded is not only distinguished by the pioneering development of empirical comparative studies; it has also been one of the most fertile academic fields for the epistemological and methodological discussion of the comparison, and in which it has been proposed, perhaps more than any other, the thesis that assigns to the comparison the status of scientific method.
However, this formulation that considers comparison as a method has been the object of severe criticism, even by political scientists. Nevertheless, the challenge of this position has not meant to ignore the importance that the comparison has - and that it has historically - in the production of scientific knowledge. Either does it imply a denial of the entity or specificity of what we usually cant connect to the network printer comparative studies.
With this problematic framework as a background, in this article we will address some historical questions, epistemological and methodological aspects related to the comparison, the comparative method and comparative studies in the social sciences, making specific references to the field of education. We begin with some general considerations about the comparison, understood as cognitive activity, since in addition to being a central feature of scientific activity, it is significantly present in our daily what is the difference between correlational and causal-comparative research.
In fact, we resort to the comparison on a recurring way - even tacit - to organize the knowledge and relate ourselves to others and to the world. Otherwise, the history of science shows that the practice of comparison has been and continues to be an indispensable resource to respond to problems of natural and social knowledge. But we must not forget the important differences between comparison as a way of thinking and as a scientific procedure in the social sciences. Terminología Científico-Social.
Barcelona: Antropos, The fact that the comparison is so naturalized in our ways of knowing, and that is not exclusive matter of the science, may be one of the reasons that explain the tendency to overlook their analysis, even in many of the specialized texts about comparative research. Anyway, it is clear that in this work we are interested in focusing more specific senses and applications of comparison in the scientific field, in which, especially from the 18th century, this became a part of the methodological procedures which contributed to the consolidation of different disciplines such as modern sciences.
That is why our text will continue with a presentation and critical assessment of the positions that define comparison as a method. Also, trying to show that even when this restrictive meaning is rejected, there is some consensus in the social sciences around the specificity of the comparative studies. And in relation to them, we will dwell in more detail on those of a trans-contextual nature cross-national and cross-culturalwith emphasis on the main methodological and technical problems faced.
Finally, we will also dedicate some paragraphs to the presentation of the comparative socio-historical perspective that, at least in the field of education, has gained importance in recent years and which centrally recovers the historicity of social processes which are the subject of comparative analysis. What do we mean when we speak about an act of comparison? In everyday speech, following a classic dictionary definition 19 19 Definition of the Diccionario Enciclopédico Salvat Salvat; Marco; Vicens, In epistemological language, it is defined as an intellectual operation through which the states of one or more objects are checked on the basis of at least one common property Fideli, FIDELI, Roberto.
La Comparazione. Milano: Angeli, Therefore, from the logical point of view, an act of comparison implies: objects which can obviously be subjects, groups, institutions, cities, countries etc. The last one has heuristic capacity insofar as it allows one phenomenon to be understood in terms of another. But the objects that are verified are of diverse nature and in that sense they cannot be compared.
For example, an analogy can be made between the human organism and society — although this was generally not very convincing —, in order to understand some social institutions and processes in function of the relatively better known characteristics of the functioning of the organism. But in the strict sense, it is not possible to compare a human body x with a society y. On the other hand, it is not necessary to resort to the verification of states about a property of objects to establish an analogy between them.
In science, comparison can be used for various purposes. Science and the Sociology of Knowledge. New Philosophies of Social Science. Basingstoke: Macmillan, Metodología de las Ciencias Sociales. Buenos Aires: Emecé, The use of comparison for nomothetic purposes is widespread in the natural sciences, especially in the design, practice and analysis of experiments.
But it also has importance in social sciences, mainly in the framework of those orientations that have promoted the development of sophisticated marketing management meaning in gujarati techniques that allow determining the empirical relations between observable properties.
In what is the difference between correlational and causal-comparative research perspective, these methodological and technical developments could be thinking, in some way, as an attempt to safeguard the Galilean assumption regarding the cognitive ends of science even in those situations in which the method that best performs it - the experiment - becomes impracticable 22 22 We refer in particular to the impossibility of considering the material object of an investigation as identical to all of its kind, and the inability to manipulate and control the properties of the said object.
Alle Origini della Statistica Moderna. Milano: Franco Angeli, Obviously, this implies considering the natural sciences as a model and assuming that scientific knowledge can only be produced by following its canons. In the case of social sciences, the impossibility of accepting, or rejecting, the assumptions of traditional conceptions of science has given rise to a series of perspectives in which comparison is used for rather ideographic or interpretive purposes.
The emphasis then laid the objects of comparison themselves, and not so much on the properties. A certain parallelism could be established between these two forms of comparison - centered on properties what are the concepts of business strategy objects - with the classic distinction between quantitative and qualitative methods of social research: the comparative approaches that emphasize the properties are generally inscribed in a quantitative orientation and those that put the emphasis on the objects in a qualitative orientation.
However, it should also be noted that, in line with the current calls for the integration with the investigative styles and methodological triangulation, Ragin 24 24 Cited in Bynner and Chisholm Beyond the differences that the comparison can acquire in scientific work, from the epistemological point of view nomothetic or ideographic orientation; input for explanation or interpretation the methodological use in the framework of quantitative or qualitative approaches so far we have referred to the comparison in a relatively general sense.
If we think instead in methodical and procedural terms, the preceding considerations are insufficient, especially if it is intended to use the comparison as a criterion to define and delimit a particular methodical strategy that has some what fast food restaurants can i use my ebt card at in the set of methods recognized and practiced by the scientific community.
This would imply transcending the comparison as a single act of knowledge and recognize that an investigation comprises a complex and articulated set of decisions and practices that are conducted in a reasonably systematized and organized way. In this sense, proposals that emphasize the comparison with the status of scientific method charge relevance, specifically in the context of the social sciences.
The expression comparative method was diffused with force from the s. Il Metodo della Comparazione. Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, Bologna, v. This does not imply that the discussion about the comparative method has also been significant in other fields such what is the difference between correlational and causal-comparative research Anthropology, History, Sociology, Education or Linguistics.
Social Science Information, Paris, v. Their classification involves a hierarchical organization according to the degree of relative effectiveness of each method for the empirical control of the hypotheses Fideli, FIDELI, Roberto. In the proposed scheme, the comparative method occupies the third place, after the statistical method and before the case studies. Before proceeding with the discussion on the comparative method, to which we will return shortly, it should be noted that the classification proposed by Lijphart presents serious limitations.
In the first funny things to put in your bumble bio, from an epistemological point of view it seems too restrictive to determine to the science a single role, defined in terms of the establishment of general empirical relations between two or more variables.
The Galilean assumption about the ends of science, to which reference has already been made, operates in a remarkably explicit way 26 26 It is particularly noteworthy that Lijphart has resorted to this position so orthodox in a historic moment of a deep debate around ideas about science. In second place, if what is involved is to establish relationships between variables, then it must be admitted that the comparison plays a fundamental role in any procedure used for this purpose.
In order to establish empirically relations between variables, it is necessary to determine the states of the object studied in these variables, and this cannot be achieved without recourse to comparison, regardless of the determination of the status is made within the framework of a procedure that allows identifying the causal direction of the relationship - as the experiment - or that is limited to determine the correlation or association from the statistical analysis of a data matrix.
Esperimento, Associazione e Insieme non Standard. Politica e Società: studi in onore di Luciano Cavalli. Padova: Cedam, This enables to construct frequency distributions of the values of a given variable and, from this, the establishment of association of relations between two or more variables. In this operation, the comparison occupies a preponderant place, so it does in the experiment, in which one variable is manipulated and others are monitored in order to evaluate the real effect of that considered independent from the verification of the states at two time points before and after a manipulation, for exampleor the differences between an experimental group and a control group.
Whatever the experimental design, resorting to comparison is inevitable. Finally, it seems legitimate to say that a case study cannot be developed without comparisons. In the worst of situations, the study of the changes of the observed case over time will involve some form of comparison. Probably the only important difference is that, most of the time, the study of a case does not imply comparisons tending to the construction of nomothetic knowledge, as in the experiment or in why are relationships important in adolescence statistical analyses at least in its more classic variant.
Based on these reviews, many authors argue that it makes no sense to propose a comparative method:. Comparison has a fundamental role in the experimentation of the physical sciences as in the almost-experimental designs used in the human sciences. But criticism has implications further broad, if we resort so what is the difference between correlational and causal-comparative research to comparison and if as cognitive activity is present in all forms of research: What sense could it have to speak not only about comparative method, but even about comparative research?
In fact, the plurality of forms that can be compared and the purposes by which it can be compared has led to the assertion that all scientific activity should be considered as comparative Swanson, SWANSON, Guy. Frameworks for Comparative Research: structural anthropology and the theory of action. Comparative Methods in Sociology: essays on trends and applications. Berkeley: University of California Press, However, comparison does not have the same place in all investigations, even if their presence is unavoidable anyway.
Indeed, it is possible to identify studies in which the cognitive objective implies an explicit and conscious confrontation, what is the difference between correlational and causal-comparative research to Sartori 27 27 Cited in Fideli In these cases, the research design is traversed in all its dimensions and facets by the central objective of comparing, and this requires a theoretical support that endows meaning and guides the systematic comparison of some units about some properties, as well as methodological decisions and technical instruments that make it operational.
We are not talking about a method in the strict sense, but of a type of research. Moreover, this type of research has reached a high degree of specificity and institutionalization in many social sciences. As an example, comparative education, whose history goes back to the beginning of the 20th century in the central countries, mainly in the United States of America, where already in and was offered a university course pioneer on this subject.
Revista Pro-Posições, Campinas, v. During the second half of why wont my ps3 connect to the tv 20th century, in the framework of the process of international reconstruction of democratic capitalism, conceived based on development theory, comparative education experienced an unprecedented moment, focusing on comparisons between the characteristics of education systems in different countries, with the objective of providing elements for the formulation and implementation of educational development policies in peripheral countries 28 28 The idea of underdevelopment establishes a hierarchy among countries and has a strong comparative value justified taking rich countries as a model for poor countries.
The objective was to generate orientations and proposals for to correct educational delays of those new States, which gave rise to the theory of human capital. This remarkable degree of institutionalization of comparative research has also fueled debates about its status, far beyond the methodological issues that, as previously noted, constitute a relatively classical demarcation criterion, and from which the idea of the comparative method has been developed. In this sense, and as in other social sciences, it is usual to find in comparative research in education positions that define it as a discipline for example Heath HEATH, Kathryn.
Is Comparative Education a Discipline? Comparative Education ReviewChicago, v.
Bravo, erais visitados por el pensamiento admirable
Bravo, que palabras adecuadas..., el pensamiento excelente
Esto me alegra realmente.
Por favor, sin rodeos.