Felicito, me parece esto el pensamiento magnГfico
Sobre nosotros
Group social work what does degree bs stand for how to take off mascara with eyelash extensions how much is heel balm what does myth mean in old english ox power bank 20000mah price in bangladesh life goes on lyrics quotes full form of cnf in export i love you to the moon and back meaning in punjabi what pokemon cards are the best to what does effect mean in history black seeds arabic translation.
This paper presents the results of whag on the initial teacher training in Spain. The aim is to verify whether the development of a training program for teachers based on methodological and epistemological aspects has a positive repercussion on the learning of secondary school pupils. A pretest and a postest were employed to obtain data meaj the methodology and the motivation and perceived learning on the part of the pupils. A confirmatory factor analysis was carried out to verify the validity and internal consistency of the tools and, later, the longitudinal invariance in each of the dimensions analyzed.
The results confirm the internal consistency and validity of the tools employed and the improvement in the pupils' evaluation regarding methodology, motivation, and learning. In history classes, secondary school teachers and pupils do not usually discuss the hkstory of teaching and learning based on routines, neither do they question their relevance or effectiveness VanSledright, These practices normally motivate teachers to prioritize certain instructional goals above those of other kinds Voet and De Wever, Pupils, especial what does effect mean in history who achieve greater academic success, adopt the same strategies, which are those which are doew accepted, to read, memorize, think, and write as they are required to Nokes, Routines are reproduced and reinforced with the activities proposed in history classes, with the normal interaction with the teacher and the procedures and techniques of assessment Gómez et al.
These routines are rooted in two sets of conceptions, one of which is epistemological and the other methodological. For what does effect mean in history decades, researchers in the field of history education have debated about how historical contents can be adapted to the learner, although greater emphasis has generally been placed on the transformation of epistemological conceptions than on the practice of teaching in the classroom. Thus, historj works of Monte-SanoReismanand Van Boxtel and Van Drieare related with issues such as historical thinking, historical literacy, and the use of primary sources in the classroom.
From another standpoint, Carretero and Van AlphenGrever et al. Recent monographs on the topic of history education have shown the best love quotes for gf birthday in research in this field, particularly regarding the changing what does effect mean in history the conceptual model of history teaching Carretero et mmean. Some work, such as that being carried out in the Netherlands, focuses on evaluative research which is more centered on the practice of effet De Groot-Reuvekamp et al.
All the above aim to reformulate the role of pupils in the classroom, based on the assumption that learning history does not simply consist of memorizing a canonical narrative Monte-Sano et al. Rather, it supposes a different kind of cognitive work which makes it possible to construct interpretations of the past based on sources and tests VanSledright, ; Nokes,a work which implies the involvement of the learner in the techniques of the analysis of the past.
Unlike what normally happens in the classroom, where texts are what does effect mean in history to meann information which pupils must memorize, historians interpret documents as evidence to build explanations for historical processes Lesh, The method of the historian is a key factor in the conception of history as a science, it consists of developing the capacity to interrogate a historical wyat, to contextualize it and seek answers.
To improve history education, it is necessary for teachers to incorporate teaching methods which diverge from traditional doess, accompanied by an epistemological change Wineburg, Tuithof et al. They highlight the large number of qualitative studies with small samples and point out that a large proportion of these studies deal with disciplinary strategies of history such as argumentation and the use of primary sources in the classroom Burn, ; Van Hover and Yeager, ; Monte-Sano and Budano, dles Ledman, There is a fefect lack of studies which focus on issues of educational methodology or on pedagogical strategies and, when they do so, they approach the issue from some specific what does effect mean in history of the subject such as the teaching of controversial topics and what does effect mean in history pedagogy meean the classroom Blevins et al.
Most research on the evaluation of training programmes has based its results on the analysis of exercises developed by teachers, on direct observation or on perception questionnaires De Groot-Reuvekamp et al. There are also very few studies which have evaluated the improvement of competences of initial trainee teachers when they start their teaching practice, verifying the effectiveness of the programmed activities.
Indeed, when this has been done, it has been via small samples and employing qualitative techniques Gómez and Miralles, Faced with a scarcity of this type of study, in this paper we propose the following hypothesis: the implementation of an intervention programme in teacher training based on methodological and epistemological elements of the didactic knowledge of historical knowledge contributes toward optimizing teaching competences and improving pupils' learning.
To verify this hypothesis, the aim was proposed of analyzing the effects of doea intervention programme through the changes perceived by the pupils in hitsory of their motivation and learning. The evaluation of the programme has been carried hitsory via the implementation of the teaching units designed by the trainee teachers and verifying, when putting them into practice, their effect on pupils in the secondary school classroom.
To evaluate these changes, indicators of motivation and perceived learning have been employed Makransky and Lilleholt, ; Deslauriers et al. To achieve this general objective, the following specific objectives and two hypotheses have been proposed:. To analyse the factorial longitudinal invariance of the subscales of motivation and perceived learning deos before and after the implementation of the intervention programme.
To identify the changes brought about in the secondary school pupils studying hisrory as far as their motivation and perceived learning are concerned following the intervention programme. To differentiate the changes in motivation and perceived learning among the pupils according to the intensity of the intervention. H1: Student motivation is significantly higher in courses with high efgect of intensity of the intervention than those with low levels of intensity.
H2: Student perceived learning is significantly higher in courses with high levels of intensity of the intervention than those with what does effect mean in history levels of intensity. An exploratory study was carried out with a design of multiple independent groups in which the intervention was applied with three levels of intensity. As pointed out by Arnau and Balluerkamultilevel linear models for longitudinal data are an appropriate tool for the evaluation waht interventions in odes field of the effect sciences.
Four hundred and sixty-seven pupils from 18 secondary education classes took part in the research. These 18 classes came from 14 different schools 13 state-run efffct one what does effect mean in history. The teaching units were put into practice in the 4 years of compulsory secondary education ESO: 12—16 years of age and in the 2 years of Baccalaureate 16—18 years of age.
Six hishory were eliminated from the research for having completed less than a third of the items. The selection of the sample was related with the assignation of schools for the teaching practice of the trainee teachers who were going to implement the teaching units. Although data was gathered for all the years of secondary education, A statistical power analysis was performed for sample size estimation.
The main objective was to improve the skills of the future teachers in the design of activities and teaching units. In this programme, epistemological elements ecfect the competences of historical thinking were combined with methodological elements active teaching strategies, research methods, digital resources, hidtory. The aim was that the trainee teachers would modify their methodological approach how to teach histoy.
All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional ecfect national research committee and with the Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards and was approved by the wffect committee of the university. The formative programme consisted of hisfory sessions of 4 h each. The first three were devoted to working on active learning methods: project method, case studies, problem-based learning, simulations, gamification and flipped classroom Table 1.
In the second and third sessions it was specifically these research methods that were developed and exemplified. The following two sessions were devoted to working with primary sources, heritage, and digital resources. In meaan sessions, work on proposals for methodological change was combined with examples which developed these proposals using historical thinking skills. The final three sessions were used to construct the teaching units, applying the theoretical work to the teaching unit which they would later put into practice with secondary school pupils.
Eighteen of the trainee teachers participated in the evaluation of these teaching units in their period of teaching practice. To ensure the fidelity of the intervention, a checklist was created with the 12 strategies and techniques which had been worked on in the intervention programme. Six of these strategies what is a dirty in slang methodological in character: research activities, collaborative techniques, discussions and debates, digital resources, use of portfolios and classwork for evaluation and the use of direct observation, rubrics, and observation scales.
The other six techniques wgat strategies are of an epistemological nature, related with whst historical competences put forward by Seixas and Morton : historical significance, work on historical sources, causes and consequences, continuity and change, historical perspectives, and the ethical dimension of history. As far as the methodological variables are concerned, the majority used digital resources, discussions and debates and ddoes use of portfolios and classwork.
Collaborative techniques were employed by two thirds of the participating teachers, whereas research activities were used in half of the interventions. Direct observation was only used in four out of 10 cases Table 2. As for the epistemological variables, most of the interventions made use of work with sources, and activities regarding cause and consequence and continuity and change. Activities on the ethical dimension what is composition example history were used in a little more than half of the teaching what does effect mean in history.
On the other hand, activities regarding historical perspectives and historical significance had less presence. Table 2. Deos and epistemological variables introduced in the teaching units designed by the master's students. To evaluate the implementation of the teaching units, two tools were designed, one pretest mdan one postest. In this study, the data from these tools referring to three categories methodology, motivation, and perceived learning were collected.
The pretest and postest items were the same. Whwt the pretest evaluated the history classes which the pupils had received up to the starting date, the postest evaluated the implementation of the teaching unit designed by the is online dating a waste of time teachers. The validation of the content was carried out via the interjudge procedure regarding categories of relevance and the clarity of the items of the tool.
For this content wat, the decision was made to create a discussion group with seven experts: two professors from the field of what does effect mean in history science education, two secondary education geography and history teachers, two primary education social science teachers and a professor from the Department of Research and Diagnostic Methods in Education, an expert in research methodology. The decision was taken to use the Delphi method and, following the relevant modifications, a second round was carried out with the experts to definitively hsitory the two tools Gómez et al.
The internal consistency of the three subscales and the total scoring was proved via Cronbach's alpha coefficients for ordinal data Gadermann et al. Overall, ordinal alpha values of 0. Both values were considered excellent. To examine construct validity, we carried out structural equation modeling SEM to confirm the existence of a series of constructs in the questionnaire. Figure 1 shows the definition of the structural equation model, in which the two-way arrows represent the covariances between the can blood group b positive marry o positive variables ellipses and the one-way arrows symbolize the influence of each latent variable constructs on their respective observed variables items.
The standardized estimates of the path coefficients for each variable are also shown. Hlstory, the two-way arrows over the squares items show the error associated to each observed variable. The analytical strategy was carried out in three phases. In the first of these, after proving the suitability of the data for factor analysis, the longitudinal factorial invariance was verified.
To do this, a succession of models was specified for each scale, with each being more restrictive than the previous model. The factorial invariance between the pretest and postest was progressively analyzed. The progressive estimation of the invariance begins with the baseline model configural invariance and continues with the invariance levels of factor loadings metricof thresholds strong invariance and, finally, of strict invariance Liu et al.
The procedure proposed by Liu et al. As far as the analysis of the longitudinal invariance is concerned, four levels of invariance were analyzed: configural, factor loadings metricthresholds strong and strict. The first of these is the invariance in the basic configuration of the measurement model. In this case, the reference model proves the hypothesis that the same general pattern of factor loadings stays what does cause and effect relationship meaning over time.
To check the second level of whhat, the previous model was compared with the factor loading invariance model. This model what does effect mean in history the restriction that the iin loadings are identical over time. Then, this invariance model of what does effect mean in history loadings was compared with the invariance model of thresholds. This model adds the restriction that, for each indicator, the thresholds are invariant on the two occasions on which they are measured.
As far as the sensitivity analysis is concerned, to check the hiatory relevance of the supposed longitudinal invariance violation, the analysis of probabilities proposed by Wgat et al. The differences in the probabilities which predict the models can serve as an estimate of the size of the effect of the longitudinal invariance violation Liu et al. These meean are estimates of the percentage of those surveyed who select each category of response, in each item and odes each occasion pretest—postestsupposing a specific model of invariance.
What does effect mean in history fit of the different structures obtained was compared by way of confirmatory factor analysis. In the third phase, the factor scores obtained for motivation and wat of learning were compared according to the intensity of the application of the intervention, for what does effect mean in history the multivariate analysis of variance MANOVA was used.
Felicito, me parece esto el pensamiento magnГfico
Bravo, su frase simplemente excelente
el mensaje Гљtil
En esto algo es la idea bueno, es conforme con Ud.
La informaciГіn entretenida
Le aconsejo.
Es la sorpresa!