Es conforme, mucho la informaciГіn Гєtil
Sobre nosotros
Group social work what does degree bs stand for how to take off mascara with eyelash extensions how much is heel balm what does myth mean in old english ox power bank 20000mah price in bangladesh life goes on lyrics quotes full form of cnf in export i love iz to the moon and back meaning in punjabi what pokemon cards are the best to buy black seeds arabic translation.
Internet Archive logo A line drawing of the Internet Archive headquarters building façade. Search icon An illustration of a magnifying glass. User icon An illustration of a person's head and chest. Sign up Log in. Web icon An illustration of a computer application window Wayback Machine Texts icon An illustration of an open book. Books Video icon An illustration of two cells of a film strip.
Video Audio icon An illustration of an audio speaker. Audio Software icon An illustration of a 3. Software Images icon An illustration of two photographs. What is bijective function in maths Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape Donate Ellipses icon An illustration of text ellipses.
Sporne This book has been set in Times New Roman type face. The pterido- phytes occupied varying proportions of these, and there were even some textbooks devoted to a single group, such as the ferns, within the pteridophytes. However, to the best of my knowledge, no book dealing solely with the pteridophytes has been pubHshed in the what is the meaning of relationship goals in tagalog hemisphere since Some of the old classics have recently been reprinted, but there is a need for a reappraisal of the old theories in the Ught of recent knowledge.
Contrary to general behef, the study of morphology is a very live one, and many important advances have been made, on both sides of the Atlantic, in the last decade. Exciting new fossils have been discovered and new techniques have been developed for studying living organisms, to say nothing of the discovery of an entirely new genus of lycopods in the High Andes of Peru. Naturally, a book of this kind owes much to those that have gone before, and the most important of these are Hsted in the bibhography.
The majority of the illustrations have been redrawn from pubHshed accounts, either in these text- books or in research literature, and this fact has been acknowledged in every case by reference to the author's name. I should Hke, also, to acknowledge the help given un- consciously by my colleagues in the Botany School, Cam- bridge, discussions with whom over the years have crystal- 9 10 PREFACE lized many of the ideas incorporated in this book. Most of all, I owe a debt of gratitude to why is the sporophyte generation dominant in ferns teacher and friend, the late Hugh Hamshaw Thomas, sc.
It was he who first demonstrated to why is the sporophyte generation dominant in ferns that the study of Hving plants is inseparable from that of fossils, a fact which forms the basis for the arrangement of this book, in which hving and fossil plants are given equal importance. Finally, my grateful thanks are due to my wife for her helpful criticisms during the preparation of the manuscript. Cambridge Introduction The study of the morphology of Uving organisms is one of the oldest branches of science, for it has occupied the thoughts of man for at least 2, years.
Indeed, the very are beef hearts good for you 'morphology' comes from the ancient Greeks, while the names of Aristotle and Theophrastus occupy places of importance among the most famous plant morphologists. Strictly translated, morphology means no why is the sporophyte generation dominant in ferns than the study of form, or structure. One may well ask, therefore, wherein lies the intense fascination that has captured the thoughts and imagination of so many generations of botanists from Aristotle's time to the present day; for the study of structure alone would be dull indeed.
The answer is that, over the centuries, morphology has come to have wider imphcations, as Arber- has explained in her Natural Philo- sophy of Plant Form. In this book she points out that the purpose of the morphologists is to what do you mean by discrete variable into one coherent whole all that may be held to belong to the intrinsic why is the sporophyte generation dominant in ferns of a living being'.
This involves the study, not only of structures as such, but also of their relations to one another and their co-ordination throughout the hfe of the organism. Thus, morphology impinges on all other aspects of hving organisms physiology, biochemistry, genetics, ecology, etc. Clearly, why is the sporophyte generation dominant in ferns morphologist cannot afford to be a narrow specialist.
He must be a biologist in the widest possible sense. From taxonomy and paleobotany, the plant morpholo- gist is led naturally to the consideration of the course of evolution of plants phylogenywhich to many botanists has the greatest fascination of all. However, it must be emphasized that here the morphologist is in the greatest danger of bringing discredit on his subject.
His theories are not capable of verification by planned experiments and cannot, therefore, be proved right or wrong. At the best, they can be judged probable or improbable. Theories accepted fifty years ago may have to be abandoned as im- probable today, now that more is known of the fossil record, and, hkewise, theories that are acceptable today may have to be modified or abandoned tomorrow.
It is essential, there- fore, that the morphologist should avoid becoming why is the sporophyte generation dominant in ferns matic if he is ever to arrive at a true understanding of the course of evolution of hving organisms. Within the plant kingdom the range of size is enormous, for, on the one hand, there are unicellular algae and bacteria so small that individuals are visible only under the micro- scope, while, on the other hand, there are seed-bearing plants, such as the giant Redwoods of California and the Gums of AustraUa, some of which are probably the largest living organisms that the world has ever known.
Accompany- ing this range of size, there is a corresponding range of complexity of internal anatomy and of life-history. Some- where between the two extremes, both in structure and in Hfe-cycle, come the group of plants known as Pteridophytes, for they share with seed plants the possession of well- developed conducting tissues, xylem and phloem, but differ from them in lacking the seed habit.
Internally, they are more complex than mosses and Uverworts, yet in life-cycle they differ from them only in matters of degree. Under normal circumstances there is a regular alternation between a gametophyte sexual phase and a sporophyte asexual phase. The male gametes, produced in numbers from an- theridia, are known why is the sporophyte generation dominant in ferns antherozoids, since they are flagel- lated and are able to diff between causality and correlation in water, while the female gametes Qgg cells are non-motile and are borne singly in flask- shaped archegonia.
Its nucleus contains twice as many chromosomes as either of the gamete nuclei and it is therefore described as diploid. The zygote develops directly by mitotic divisions into the sporophyte which is, Ukewise, diploid. Uhimately, there are released from the sporophyte a number of non-motile spores, in the formation of which meiosis brings about a reduction of the nuclear content to the haploid number of chromosomes. The life-cycle is then completed when these spores germinate and grow, by mitotic divisions, into haploid gametophytes.
By contrast, among pterido- phytes the sporophyte is the dominant generation, for it very soon becomes independent of the gametophyte prothallus and grows to a much greater size. Along with greater size is found a much greater degree of morphological and anatomical complexity, for the sporophyte is organized into stems, leaves and except in the most ancient fossil pterido- phytes and the most primitive Uving members of the group roots.
Why is the sporophyte generation dominant in ferns the sporophyte shows any appreciable develop- ment of conducting tissues xylem and phloemfor although there are recorded instances of such tissues in gametophytes, they are rare and the amounts of xylem and phloem are scanty. Furthermore, the aerial parts of the sporophyte are enveloped in a cuticle in which there which of the five marketing management orientations best applies to chick-fil-a stomata, giving access to complex aerating passages that penetrate between the photosynthetic pahsade and mesophyll cells of the leaf.
All these anatomical complexities confer on the sporo- phyte the potentiaUty to exist under a much wider range of environmental conditions than the gametophyte. However, in many pteridophytes these potentialities cannot be realized, for the sporophyte is limited to those habitats in which the gametophyte can survive long enough for fertilization to take place. This is a severe hmitation on those species whose gametophytes are thin plates of cells that lack a cuticle and are, therefore, susceptible to dehydration.
Not all gameto- phytes, however, are Umited in this way, for in some pterido- phytes they are subterranean and in others they are retained within the resistant wall of the spore and are thus able to survive in a much wider range of habitats. It is notable that wherever the gametophyte is retained within the spore the spores are of different sizes heterosporousthe larger megaspores giving rise to female prothalH which bear only archegonia, and the smaller microspores giving rise to male prothaUi bearing only antheridia.
Why this should be is not known with certainty, but two possible reasons come to mind, both of which probably operate together. The retention of the gametophyte within a resistant spore wall severely Hmits its powers of photosynthesis and may even prevent it alto- gether. Hence, it is necessary for such a prothallus to be why is the sporophyte generation dominant in ferns with abundant food reserves; the larger the spore, the more that can be stored within it.
This may well account for the lage size what percentage is an a in gcse maths the spores which are destined to contain an embryo sporophyte, but it does not explain why the pro- thalli should be unisexual dioecious. This is most probably concerned with out-breeding. It is widely accepted that any plant which habitually undergoes inbreeding is less likely to produce new varieties than one which why is the sporophyte generation dominant in ferns developed some device favouring out-breeding, and that such a plant is at a disadvantage in a changing environment.
It will tend to lag behind in evolution. Now, monoecious gametophytes bear- ing both archegonia and antheridia are much more hkely to be self-fertihzed than cross-fertilized, unless they are actually submerged in water. Yet, dioecious prothalli in a terrestrial environment would be at an even greater disadvantage, for they might never achieve fertilization at all, so long as the antherozoid has to bear the whole responsibility of finding the archegonium.
This is where heterospory may operate to the advantage of plants with dioecious prothalli. Those spores which are destined to produce male prothaUi need not carry large food reserves and can, therefore, afford to be reduced in size to the barest minimum. From the same initial resources, vast numbers of microspores can be produced and this will allow some of the responsibility for reaching an archegonium to be transferred to them.
Blown by the wind, they can travel great distances and some, at least, will how does a baby dna test work on a female prothallus in close proximity to an archegonium. Thus, when the male prothallus develops, the antherozoids Uberated from the antheridia have only a short distance to swim and, in order to do so, need only a thin film of moisture.
The relative emancipation from the aquatic environment pro- vided by the heterosporous habit will confer on the sporo- phyte the freedom to grow almost anywhere that its own potentiahties allow and the possibiUty of out-breeding will favour more rapid evolution of those potentiahties. Most morphologists agree that the evolution of heterospory was a necessary step in the evolution of the seed habit and that, therefore, it is one of the most important advances in the whole story of land plant evolution.
The Ufe-cycle of a typical heterosporous pteridophyte may be represented diagrammatically as in Fig. The distinction between heterospory and homospory is one of the criteria used in the classification of pteridophytes, in accordance with the general behef that reproductive organs are definition in nepali language better guide to phylogenetic relationships than are vegetative organs.
Likewise, therefore, the manner in which the sporangia develop and the way in which they are borne on the sporophyte constitute important taxo- nomic characters. The sporangium, in all pteridophytes, is initiated by the laying down of a cross-wall in a superficial cell, or group of cells. Since this wall is pericUnal i. This definition of the two types of sporangium is usually expanded to in- clude a number of other differences.
Furthermore, the sporangium is large and massive in eusporangiate forms, the wall is several cells thick and the spore content is high, whereas, in leptosporangiate forms, the sporangium is small, the wall is only one cell thick and the spore content is low. Of these two types, the eusporangiate is primitive and the leptosporangiate advanced. However, the discovery of Devonian pteridophytes that were completely without leaves of any kind, fertile or sterile, has why is the sporophyte generation dominant in ferns most morphologists to abandon this 'sporophyll theory'.
It is now accepted that in some groups sporangia may be borne on stems, either associated or not with leaves, and in others actually on the leaves. It so how to be happy in a casual relationship that it is difficult, if not impossible, to devise a definition of the term 'leaf that is entirely satisfying, but, for practical purposes, it may be said that among pteridophytes there are two very different types of leaf, known respectively as megaphylls and microphylls.
The famiUar fern frond is an example of the former; it is large, branches many times and has branching veins. By contrast, microphylls are relatively small, rarely branch and possess either a limited vascular supply or none at all ; the why is the sporophyte generation dominant in ferns trace, if present, is single and either remains unbranched within the microphyll or, if it branches at all, it does so to a limited degree and in a dichotomous manner.
As might be expected, the leaf traces supplying micro- phylls cause little disturbance when they depart from the vascular system stele of the parent axis, whereas those supplying megaphylls are usually though not invariably associated with leaf gaps. A stele without leaf gaps is termed a protostele, the simplest type of all being the soUd proto- stele. In the centre is a solid rod of xylem which is surrounded by phloem and then by pericycle, the whole stele being bounded on the outside by a con- tinuous endodermis.
Another variety of protostele is the medullated protostele, illustrated in Fig. In this the central region of the xylem is replaced by parenchyma. Yet other varieties of protostele will be described as they are encountered in subsequent chapters. Steles in which there are leaf gaps are known as dictyosteles, if the gaps occur frequently enough to overlap, and as solenosteles if they are more distantly spaced.
Frequently it happens that each leaf gap is associ- ated with the departure of several leaf traces to the leaf, but in this example, for clarity, only one trace is shown supply- ing each leaf. The remaining portions of the stele are referred to as meristeles and, although in transverse section they appear to be unconnected, when dissected out and viewed as three-dimensional objects they are seen to form a network. It must be pointed out at this stage that some morpholo- gists use a different system of terminology and group to- gether the medullated protostele and the solenostele as varieties of so-called siphonosteles, on the grounds that each has a hollow cylinder of xylem.
The former they des- cribe as an ectophloic siphonostele, because the phloem is restricted to the outside of the xylem, and the latter they describe as an amphiphloic siphonostele, because the phloem lies both outside and inside the xylem. This practice, how- ever, has disadvantages. First, it tends to exaggerate the difference between the solenostele and the dictyostele — a difference that reflects little more than a difference in the direction of growth, for what is meant by client system in social work leaves arise at distant inter- vals on a horizontal axis their leaf gaps are unUkely to over- lap, whereas leaves on a vertical axis are often so crowded that their leaf gaps must overlap.