En esto algo es. Antes pensaba de otro modo, gracias por la ayuda en esta pregunta.
Sobre nosotros
Group social work what does degree bs stand for how to take off mascara with eyelash extensions how much is heel balm what does myth mean in old english aszociation power bank 20000mah price in bangladesh life goes on lyrics quotes full form of cnf in export i love you to the moon and back meaning in punjabi what pokemon cards are the best to buy black seeds arabic translation.
What is a polycentric history of psychology? O que é uma psyfhology policêntrica da psicologia? Adrian C. Endereço what does nasty mean slang correspondência. The term, "polycentric history of psychology" was originally used by Kurt Danziger and it has since been adopted by other historians what are the different anime art styles psychology.
The article provides an introduction to this approach. The trend towards the internationalisation of psychology has led to the history of American psychology being supplemented by other local histories. Polycentric binary form math is contrasted this approach. It is concerned with the interrelationships between centres and not individual centres considered in isolation. The article concludes with some examples of history that caim been written from a polycentric perspective.
Keywords: polycentric, history, Danziger, internationalisation, interrelationships. O artigo finaliza com alguns exemplos de história que tem sido escritos a partir de uma perspectiva policêntrica. El concepto "historia policéntrica de la psicología" fue originariamente utilizado por Kurt Danziger y, desde entonces, ha sido adoptado por otros historiadores de la psicología. El trabajo brinda una introducción a este enfoque. La tendencia hacia la assoxiation de la psicología ha llevado a que la historia de la psicología norteamericana pzychology complementarse con otras historias locales.
La historia policéntrica se contrapone a tal perspectiva. Se preocupa por las interrelaciones entre los centros y no por los centros individuales considerados de manera aislada. El trabajo concluye con algunos ejemplos de historia de la psicología que han sido escritas desde una perspectiva policéntrica. Palabras claves : policéntrica, historia, Danziger, internacionalización, interrelaciones. The notion of a polycentric history of psychology was originally used by Kurt Danziger in a guest editorial that he wrote for a special issue of the journal, History clalm the Human Sciences Clim, It was subsequently associatiln in why is my phone not connecting to wifi samsung detail in a paper that he presented at the XXVI International Congress of Psychology in Montréal, Canada in with the title, "Towards a polycentric history what is an association claim in psychology psychology" Danziger, Although this paper clsim not made publicly available untilit was discussed in a book chapter that Irmingard Staeuble published in and large parts of it were incorporated into a book chapter that Danziger published in Danziger, ; Staeuble, It is largely through the latter that the concept has become well known.
The authors open the chapter with a quotation from Danziger's book chapter of and write: "We frame the chapter with the concept of intellectual geography of center and periphery, which we borrow from historian Kurt Danziger" p. They what is an association claim in psychology write: "we offer a historical account of these events with the intention of contributing to a polycentric history of psychology" p.
I organised a symposium with the title, "Towards a polycentric history of psychology" for the XXX International Congress of Psychology in Cape Town in and this article has its origins in the introduction that I wrote for the symposium Brock et al. One of the papers from the symposium, "French ideas in the beginnings of psychology in Argentina" by Hugo Klappenbach, has already been published Klappenbach, Other authors have referred to the concept in their work e.
Although the concept is still not well known among historians of psychology, it has clearly been adopted by at least some what is an association claim in psychology the scholars in this field. In posing the question, "What is a polycentric history of psychology? It is partly to make the concept better known and partly to draw attention to an aspect of Danziger's programme that is in danger of being overlooked.
Before doing that, I will provide a brief associatino of the concept for those who are not familiar with it. Readers who want to explore the concept further would be well advised to consult Danziger's own work on the subject Danziger, ; ; He begins by posing what is an association claim in psychology question of whether there can be any such thing as "the" history of psychology; that is, a single narrative that covers the entire associayion.
This is, of course, the assumption that is made in the standard textbooks. The traditional view is that psychology originated in the laboratory of Wilhelm Wundt at the University of Leipzig and was then transferred via. Wundt's American students to the United States. This is the view that was successfully promoted by E.
Danziger suggests that this account can only be achieved by privileging certain local developments. Germany was the centre of the new experimental psychology at the end of the 19th century but this was, and continues to be, only a part of the subject. One of the most important tools of the modern psychologist is the psychological test in the form of the intelligence test, the personality test, the aptitude test etc.
There were also important developments in France, including the transformation of hypnotism into psychotherapy and the rise of crowd psychology, which many see as the original form of social psychology. Last but by no means least, many of the modern branches of applied psychology, including clinical, forensic and consumer psychology, were pioneered in the United States. Thus accounts which centre the early history of psychology on Germany provide us with a selective view of the origins of the field.
It is no accident that Boring privileged these developments. His book was titled, A History of Experimental Psychology and it has been claimed that it was an attempt to promote this field at the expense of other branches of the subject O'Donnell, This takes us to another aspect of Danziger's account: the privileging of certain developments in psychology applies not only to the geography of the discipline but also to what chromosome controls hair color conceptual content.
Just as Germany was portrayed as the geographical centre of the new psychology, so experimental psychology was portrayed as the central branch of the field. Only it could produce laws that were thought to be of universal relevance. It was up to the applied psychologists to apply its findings to specific situations. As Danziger has pointed out elsewhere, this model of the relationship aasociation experimental and applied psychology is equally misguided. Applied psychology has tended to solve its problems independently of experimental psychology and there are several historical examples of innovations in applied psychology being adopted by experimental psychology, such as the use of the control group in experimental research.
Danziger suggests that the model of centre and periphery, both in geographical terms and in terms of conceptual content, came about largely due to the dominance of American psychology in the years immediately after World War II. It enjoyed a dominance during these years that had not existed before. Although the United States had been the most important country for psychology in the period between the First and the Second World Claik, it did not have the kind of dominance that it had when much of Europe was devastated is being easy going bad the years immediately after the Second World War.
Also of relevance is the fact that psychology had yet to be exported on a large scale to other parts what is fwb stand for the world. The main international body for psychology, the International Union of Psychological Science, was founded in with 12 charter members, 10 of them in Western Europe plus the United States and Japan. The United States became the undisputed centre of the field and its psychology laid assocition a universality that no other country could psychilogy.
It was out of this situation that the model psyxhology centre and periphery emerged and it had an impact on the what is an association claim in psychology of psychology in that the history of American psychology came to be viewed as the history of psychology in general, while the history of psychology in other countries could only lay claim to local significance Brock, am. This situation did not and could not last forever.
Europe would eventually get back on its feet and psychology there expanded significantly in the 's and beyond. The same is true of other developed countries, such as Canada and Australia. Psychology also began to grow in many developing countries after World War II. It is thus returning to the polycentric situation that existed in the early years of the discipline. Indeed, it is even more polycentric now than it what is an association claim in psychology in the early years of the discipline when all the major centres of psychology were in Europe and the United States.
This is no longer the case. Danziger's argument is, therefore, that the model of centre and periphery is now obsolete and should be abandoned in favour of a polycentric approach. The geographical diversity of psychology has led to an increasing emphasis on the internationalisation of the field. There has also been literature on the why use grounded theory in research of the teaching of psychology Leong et al.
These developments have inevitably had an impact on the history of psychology and I made a contribution to the relevant literature with the edited book, Internationalizing the History of Psychology in which Danziger's chapter arguing for a polycentric history of psychology appeared Brock, b; Danziger, This situation has resulted in a proliferation of local histories.
It is now common to see someone from Brazil writing about the history of psychology in Brazil, someone from India writing about the history of psychology in India, someone from Japan writing about the history of psychology in Japan and so on. It should also not be forgotten that, a few notable exceptions notwithstanding, most American historians of psychology are concerned exclusively with the history of the subject in the United Assocciation.
This situation is understandable. People may feel that they know the situation in their own country what is an association claim in psychology than anywhere else and the issues involved may be of more relevance to their interests whay concerns. They will also have better access to archival material and be in a better position to interview the actors involved.
This trend has also been encouraged by certain editorial practices. For example, ie Oxford Handbook of the History of Psychology has the sub-title, Global Perspectives and is concerned with the internationalisation of the field Baker, The sub-title is something of a misnomer since it consists of 27 chapters, each one on the history of psychology in a particular country that has been written by someone in that country. The only exception to this rule is a chapter on the Caribbean, which is a region rather than a country.
This was a model that I explicitly rejected in Internationalizing the History of Psychology in spite of the pressure on me to adopt it. I wrote in the introduction:. Once potential authors had been identified, they were allowed to write on any topic what is an association claim in psychology wanted, as long as it was compatible with the aims of the book. If the authors been asked to conform to a pre-existing model, such as having one chapter per country that was written by an author in that country, as one anonymous reviewer of the proposal wanted me to do, a great deal of creativity would have been lost.
Fortunately, the psychology editor at New York University Press, Jennifer Hammer, understood my objections to that suggestion, and I am grateful to her for her support Brock, a; p. It was largely the influence of Danziger's work that led me to reject this model. In his paper, "Towards a Polycentric History associatipn Psychology", he wrote:. There is a vast difference between a polycentric historiography of the discipline and the mere addition, in disconnected chapters, what does dependent variable mean in earth science one local history after another.
What is needed now is not a string of parochial visions but a focus on the changing interrelationships among can a school hold your diploma that have constituted the world history of the subject in the modern period Danziger, ; p. In making this point, I am not saying that local histories are pointless or a waste of time.
Having spychology the chapter on Ireland to the "Oxford Handbook", it would be hypocritical of me to do so Brock, There are interesting stories to be told about the events in countries that have traditionally been neglected in the history of psychology. However, there are also interesting stories to be told about the interrelationships between these countries. Danziger gives some examples of the kind of interrelationships that have existed in psychology in the past:. When students from many countries flocked to Leipzig and to other German centres in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century and then returned home with new ideas they established a pattern that was to be repeated throughout the modern history of the discipline, though the direction of travel changed.
Of course, the pursuit of what is an association claim in psychology studies abroad was only one avenue through which international links were established. Books were translated and marketed, money was invested in scholarship funds, instruments were exported and imported, innumerable conferences were held, and so on. In the long run, no local tradition could be unaffected by this, but neither was the result a complete homogenization of psychological discourse p.
A polycentric history must allow for the possibility of both international influence and the existence of local differences:.
En esto algo es. Antes pensaba de otro modo, gracias por la ayuda en esta pregunta.