Que pregunta Гєtil
Sobre nosotros
Group social work abaolute does degree bs stand for how to take off mascara with eyelash extensions how much is heel balm what does myth mean in old english ox power bank 20000mah price in bangladesh life goes on lyrics quotes full form of cnf in export i love you to the moon and back meaning in punjabi what pokemon cards are the best to buy black seeds arabic translation.
The identification of asymmetric conditional heteroscedasticity is often based on sample cross-correlations between past and squared observations. In this paper what are examples of dynamic risk factors analyse the effects of outliers on these cross-correlations and, consequently, on the identification of asymmetric volatilities.
We show that, as expected, one isolated big outlier biases the sample cross-correlations towards zero and hence could hide true leverage effect. Unlike, the presence of two or more big consecutive outliers could lead to detecting spurious asymmetries or asymmetries of the wrong sign. We also address the problem of robust estimation of the cross-correlations by extending some popular robust estimators of pairwise correlations and autocorrelations.
Their finite sample resistance against outliers is compared through Monte Carlo experiments. Situations with isolated and patchy outliers of different sizes are examined. It is shown that a modified Ramsay-weighted estimator of the cross-correlations outperforms other estimators in identifying asymmetric conditionally heteroscedastic models.
Finally, the results are illustrated with an empirical application. One of the main topics that has focused the research of Agustín over a long period of time is seasonality. However, this is not his only topic of interest. In these papers, Agustín and his coauthors consider the effects and treatment of outliers in macroeconomic data and, consequently, deal primarily with linear time series models. However, outliers are also present in the context of financial time series mainly when they are observed over long periods of time.
It is important to note that, in this framework, the interest shifts from conditional means to conditional variances and, consequently, to non-linear models. Agustín has also contributions in this area; see Fiorentini and Maravall for what does it mean when the mean absolute deviation is zero analysis of the dynamic dependence of second order moments. When dealing with financial data, many series of returns are conditionally heteroscedastic with volatilities responding asymmetrically to negative and positive past returns.
Following Black this feature is commonly referred to as leverage effect. Incorporating the leverage effect into conditionally heteroscedastic models is important to better capture the dynamic behaviour of financial returns and improve the forecasts of future volatility; see Bollerslev et al. The identification of conditional heteroscedasticity is often based on the sample autocorrelations of squared returns.
Carnero et al. On the other hand, the identification of leverage effect is often based on the sample cross-correlations between past and squared returns. Negative values of these cross-correlations indicate orangutan closest relative asymmetries in the volatility; see, for example, Bollerslev et al. In this paper, we analyse how the identification of asymmetries, when based on the sample cross-correlations, can also be affected by the presence of outliers.
This paper has two main contributions. First, we derive the asymptotic biases caused by large outliers on the sample cross-correlation of order h between past and squared observations generated by uncorrelated stationary processes. In particular, one isolated large outlier biases all the sample cross-correlations towards zero and so it could hide true leverage effect.
Moreover, the presence of two big consecutive outliers biases the first-order sample cross-correlation towards 0. The second contribution of this paper is to address the problem of robust estimation of serial cross-correlations by extending several popular robust estimators of pairwise correlations and autocorrelations. In the context of bivariate Gaussian variables, there are several proposals to robustify the pairwise sample correlation; see Shevlyakov and Smirnov for a review of the most popular ones.
However, the literature on robust estimation of correlations for time series is scarce and mainly focused on autocovariances and autocorrelations. For example, Hallin and Puri propose to estimate the autocovariances using rank-based methods. Ma and Genton introduce a robust estimator of the autocovariances based on the robust scale estimator of Rousseeuw and Croux More recently, Lévy-Leduc et al.
Ma and Genton also suggest a possible robust estimator of the autocorrelation function but they do not further discuss its properties neither apply it in their empirical application. The theoretical and empirical evidence from all these papers strongly suggests using robust estimators to measure the dependence structure of time series. We analyse and compare the finite sample properties of the proposed robust estimators of the cross-correlations between past and squared observations of stationary uncorrelated series.
As expected, these estimators are resistant against outliers remaining the same regardless of the size and the number of outliers. Moreover, even in the presence of consecutive large outliers, the robust estimators considered estimate the true sign of the cross-correlations although they underestimate their magnitudes. Among the robust cross-correlations considered, the modified version of the Ramsay-weighted serial autocorrelation suggested by Teräsvirta and Zhao provides the best resistance against outliers and the lowest bias.
To illustrate the results, we compute the sample cross-correlations and their robust counterparts of a real series of daily financial returns. We show how consecutive extreme observations bias the usual sample cross-correlations and could lead to wrongly identifying potential leverage effect. These empirical results enhance the importance of using robust measures of serial correlation to identify both conditional heteroscedasticity and leverage effect.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 is devoted to the analysis of the effects of additive outliers on the sample cross-correlations between past and squared observations of stationary uncorrelated time series that could be either homoscedastic or heteroscedastic. Section 3 considers four robust measures of cross-correlation and compares their finite sample properties in the presence of outliers. The difficulty of extending the Ma and Genton proposal to the estimation of serial cross-correlation is discussed in Sect.
The empirical analysis of a time series of daily Dow Jones Industrial Average index is carried out in Sect. Section 6 concludes the paper with a summary of the main results and proposals for further research. In this section, we derive analytically the effect of large additive outliers on the sample cross-correlations between past and squared observations generated by uncorrelated stationary processes that could be either homoscedastic or heteroscedastic.
The main results are illustrated with some Monte Carlo experiments. The observed series is then given by. In order to make the calculations simpler, we consider the following alternative expression of the numerator what does it mean when the mean absolute deviation is zero 2which is asymptotically equivalent if the sample size, Tis large relative to the cross-correlation order, h. When h is smaller than the number of consecutive outliers, i.
On the other hand, when the order of the cross-correlation is larger than the number of outliers, i. Equation 7 shows that the effect of outliers on the sample cross-correlations depends on: 1 whether the outliers are consecutive or isolated and 2 their sign. Thus, if a heteroscedastic time series with leverage effect is contaminated by a large single outlier, the detection of genuine leverage effect will be difficult, as it was the detection of genuine heteroscedasticity; see Carnero fundamentals of marketing management book pdf al.
For example, if T is large, two huge positive negative consecutive outliers generate a first order cross-correlation tending to 0. Therefore, if a heteroscedastic time series without leverage effect or an uncorrelated homoscedastic series is contaminated by several large negative consecutive outliers, the negative cross-correlations generated by the outliers can be confused with asymmetric conditional heteroscedasticity.
So far, we have assumed that the consecutive outliers have the same magnitude and sign. However, it could also be interesting to analyse the effects of outliers of different signs on the sample cross-correlations. Note also that the results above are still valid if the outliers have different sizes. The EGARCH model generates asymmetric conditionally heteroscedastic time series and, according to Rodríguez and Ruizit is more flexible than other asymmetric GARCH-type models, to simultaneusly represent the dynamics of financial returns and satisfy the conditions for positive volatilities, covariance stationarity and finite kurtosis.
Footnote should a 12 year old watch love island. For what does red circle mean on bumble replicate, we compute the sample cross-correlations up to order 50 and then, for each lag, hwe compute their average over all replicates. The first row of Fig. The average sample cross-correlations computed from the corresponding contaminated series with one and two outliers are plotted in the second and third rows, respectively.
In all cases, the red solid line represents the true cross-correlations. The red solid line represents the true cross-correlations. As we can see, when a series generated by the EGARCH model is contaminated with one single large negative what does it mean when the mean absolute deviation is zero, we may wrongly conclude that there is not leverage effect since all the cross-correlations become nearly zero.
Therefore, in this case, we can identify either a negative leverage effect when there is none the series is truly a Gaussian white noise or a much more negative leverage effect than the actual one as in the case of the EGARCH model. Similar results would be obtained if the two outliers were positive, but in this case the first cross-correlation would be biased towards 0.
Consequently, we could wrongly identify asymmetries in a series that is actually white noise or we could identify a positive leverage effect when it is truly negative as in the EGARCH process. We now analyse how fast the limit in 7 is reached as the size of the outliers increases. We then compute the average of the first and second order sample cross-correlations from these contaminated series over the replicates. The values of the theoretical cross-correlations for the uncontaminated processes are also displayed with a red solid line.
Monte Carlo means of sample cross-correlations of order 1 first row and of order 2 second row for white noise first column and EGARCH series second column contaminated with a single negative outlier and with two consecutive outliers, negative and positive, as a function of the outlier size. The red solid line represents the true cross-correlation. As we can see, the sample cross-correlations start being distorted when the outliers are larger in absolute value than 5 standard deviations.
Moreover, the size of two consecutive outliers does not need to be very large to distort the first order sample cross-correlation. However, a single outlier needs to be of larger magnitude to bias this correlation towards zero. In homoscedastic series, two consecutive outliers have a tremendous effect on the first order sample cross-correlation, even if they are not very big, and could lead to wrongly identify asymmetries in a series that is actually white noise. On the other hand, the first cross-correlations of what does a social hierarchy mean heteroscedastic series contaminated with one single outlier as big as 15 or 20 could be confused with those of a white noise.
Similar results would be obtained if the series were contaminated with positive outliers but they are not reported here to save space. In the previous section we have shown that the sample cross-correlations between past and squared observations of a stationary uncorrelated series are very sensitive to the presence of outliers and could lead to a wrong identification of asymmetries.
In this section we consider robust cross-correlations to overcome this problem. In particular, we generalize some of the robust estimators for the pairwise correlations described in Shevlyakov and Smirnov and one of the robust autocorrelations proposed by Teräsvirta and Zhao We discuss their finite sample properties and compare them to the properties of the sample cross-correlations.
A direct way of robustifying the pairwise sample correlation coefficient what does it mean when the mean absolute deviation is zero two random variables is to replace the averages by their corresponding nonlinear robust counterparts, the medians; see Falk Unless otherwise stated, the median is calculated over the whole sample. Another what does it mean when the mean absolute deviation is zero robust estimator of the pairwise correlation is the Blomqvist quadrant correlation coefficient.
The extension of this coefficient to cross-correlations yields the following expression, that will be called the Blomqvist cross-correlation coefficient:. This estimator extended to compute cross-correlations, called median cross-correlation coefficientwould be:. The resulting weighted estimator of the cross-correlation of order h proposed is given by. Note that when the weighting scheme is applied to squared observations, the weights are squared so that bigger squared observations are more downward weighted than their corresponding observations in levels.
In order to analyse the finite sample properties of the four robust cross-correlations introduced above, we consider the same Monte Carlo simulations described in Sect. For each replicate, the robust cross-correlations are computed up to lag The second and third rows of Fig. In all cases, the true cross-correlations are also displayed. Several conclusions emerge from Fig.