what does casual relationship mean urban dictionary

Douglas Mitchell provided helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper. For example, Needham maintained that the Kenyah of Borneo use a concept of unmediated « direct causation » that has no counterpart in Western society. The odds ratio can be defined as the excess or reduction in the advantage that exposed individuals have in presenting the condition compared to not presenting it, concerning the advantage or reduction in non-exposed individuals presenting the condition compared to not presenting it. The search accounted for 25 papers included in the review, 10 of which with multiple variable analysis. Likewise, bear in mind the fulfilment or not of the assumption of homogeneity of variance when it comes to choosing resaerch appropriate test. Other types of ecological study are studies of migrant populations, which are used to discriminate genetic factors from environmental factors based on geographical definition of causal relationship in research cultural variation. Conditional probability.

The generation of scientific knowledge in Psychology has made significant headway over the last decades, as the number of articles published in high impact journals has risen substantially. Breakthroughs in our understanding of the phenomena under study demand a better theoretical elaboration of work hypotheses, efficient application of research designs, and special rigour concerning the use of statistical methodology. Anyway, a rise in productivity does not always mean the achievement of high scientific standards.

On the whole, statistical use may entail a source of negative effects on the quality of research, both due to 1 the degree of difficulty inherent to some methods to be understood and applied and 2 the commission of a series of errors and mainly the omission of key information needed to assess the adequacy of the analyses carried out. Despite the existence of noteworthy studies in the literature aimed at criticising these misuses published specifically as improvement guidesthe occurrence of statistical malpractice has to be overcome.

Given the growing complexity of theories put forward in Psychology in general and in Clinical and Health Psychology in particular, the likelihood of these errors has increased. Therefore, the primary aim of this work is to provide a set of key statistical recommendations for authors to apply appropriate standards of methodological rigour, and for reviewers to be firm when it comes to demanding a series of sine qua non conditions for the publication of papers.

Los avances en la comprensión de los fenómenos objeto de estudio exigen una mejor elaboración teórica de las hipótesis de trabajo, una aplicación eficiente de los diseños de investigación y un gran rigor en la utilización de la metodología estadística. Por esta razón, sin embargo, no siempre un incremento en la productividad supone alcanzar un alto nivel de calidad científica. A pesar de que definition of causal relationship in research notables trabajos dedicados a la crítica de estos malos usos, publicados específicamente como guías de mejora, la incidencia de mala praxis estadística todavía permanece en niveles mejorables.

Dada la creciente complejidad de las teorías elaboradas en la psicología en general y en la psicología clínica y de la salud en particular, la probabilidad de ocurrencia de tales errores se ha incrementado. Por este motivo, el objetivo fundamental de este trabajo es presentar un conjunto de recomendaciones estadísticas fundamentales para que los autores consigan aplicar un nivel de rigor metodológico adecuado, así como para que los revisores se muestren firmes a la hora de exigir una serie de condiciones sine qua non para la publicación de trabajos.

In the words of Loftus"Psychology will be a much better science when we change the way we analyse data". Empirical data in science are used to contrast hypotheses and to obtain evidence that will improve the content of the theories formulated. However it is essential to establish control procedures that will ensure a significant degree of isomorphism between theory and data as a result of the representation in the form of models of the reality under study.

Over the last decades, both the theory and the hypothesis testing statistics of social, behavioural and health sciences, have grown in complexity Treat and Weersing, Anyway, the use of statistical methodology in research has significant shortcomings Sesé and Palmer, what does a positive relationship mean This problem has also consequences for the editorial management and policies of scientific journals in Psychology.

For example, Fiona, Cummings, Burgman, and Thomason say that the lack of improvement in the use of statistics in Psychology may result, on the one hand, from the inconsistency of editors of Psychology journals in following the guidelines on the use of statistics established by the American Psychological Association and the journals' recommendation and, on the other hand from the possible delays of researchers in reading statistical handbooks.

Whatever the cause, the fact is that the empirical evidence found by Sesé and Palmer regarding the use of statistical techniques in the field of Clinical and Health Psychology seems to indicate a widespread use of conventional statistical methods except a few exceptions. Yet, even when working with conventional statistics significant omissions are made that compromise the quality of the analyses carried out, such as basing the hypothesis test only on the levels of significance definition of causal relationship in research the tests applied Null Hypothesis Significance Testing, henceforth NHSTor not analysing what is genetic selection in humans fulfilment of the statistical assumptions inherent to each method.

Hill and Thomson listed 23 journals of Psychology and Education in which their editorial policy clearly promoted alternatives to, or at least warned read receipts meaning in bengali the risks of, NHST. Few years later, the situation does not seem to be better. This lack why do guys feel trapped in a relationship control of the quality of statistical inference does not mean that it is incorrect or wrong but that it puts it into question.

Apart from these apparent shortcomings, there seems to be is a feeling of inertia in the application of techniques as if they were a simple statistical cookbook -there is a tendency to keep doing what has always been done. This inertia can turn inappropriate practices into habits ending definition of causal relationship in research in being accepted for the causation philosophy summary sake of research corporatism.

Therefore, the important thing is not to suggest the use of complex or less known statistical methods "per se" but rather to value the potential of these techniques for generating key knowledge. This may generate important changes in the way researchers reflect on what are the best ways of optimizing the research-statistical methodology binomial. Besides, improving statistical performance is not merely a desperate attempt to overcome the constraints or methodological suggestions issued by the reviewers and publishers of journals.

Paper authors do not usually value the implementation of methodological suggestions because of its contribution to the improvement of research as such, but rather because it will ease the ultimate publication of the paper. Consequently, this work gives a set of non-exhaustive recommendations on the appropriate use of statistical methods, particularly in the field of Clinical and Health Psychology.

We try to provide a useful tool for the appropriate dissemination of research results through statistical procedures. In line with the style guides of the main scientific journals, the structure of the sections of a paper is: 1. Method; 2. Measurement; 3. Analysis and Results; and 4. It is necessary definition of causal relationship in research provide the type of research to be conducted, which will enable the reader to quickly figure out the methodological framework of the paper.

Studies cover a lot of aims and there is a need to establish a hierarchy to prioritise them or establish the thread that leads from one to the other. As long as the outline of the aims is well designed, both the operationalization, the order of presenting the results, and the analysis of the conclusions will be much clearer. Sesé and Palmer in their bibliometric study found that the use of different types of research was described in this descending order of use: Survey It is worth noting that some studies do not establish the type of design, but use inappropriate or even incorrect nomenclature.

In order to facilitate the description of the methodological framework of the study, the guide drawn up by Montero and León may be followed. The interpretation of definition of causal relationship in research results of any study depends on the characteristics of the population under study. It is essential to clearly define the population of reference and the sample or samples used participants, stimuli, or studies. If comparison or control groups have been defined in the design, the presentation of their defining criteria cannot be left out.

The sampling method used definition of causal relationship in research be described in detail, stressing inclusion or exclusion criteria, if there are any. The size of the sample in each subgroup must be recorded. Do not forget to clearly explain the randomization procedure if any and the analysis of representativeness of samples. Concerning representativeness, by way of analogy, let us imagine a high definition digital photograph of a familiar face made up of a large set of pixels.

The minimum representative sample will be the one that while significantly reducing the number of pixels in the photograph, still allows the face to be recognised. For a deeper understanding, you may consult the classic work on sampling techniques by Cochranor the more recent work by Thompson Whenever possible, make a prior assessment of a large enough size to be able to achieve the power required in your hypothesis test.

Random assignment. For a research which aims at generating cause and effect reasoning def inferences, the random extraction of the sample is just as important as the assignment of the sample units to the different levels of the potentially causal variable.

Random selection guarantees the representativeness of the sample, whereas random assignment makes it possible to achieve better internal validity and thereby greater control of the quality of causal inferences, which are more free from the possible effects of confounding variables. Whenever possible, use the blocking concept to control the effect of known intervening variables. For instance, the R programme, in its agricolae library, enables us to obtain random assignation schematics of the following types of designs: Completely randomized, Randomized blocks, Latin squares, Graeco-Latin squares, Balanced incomplete blocks, Cyclic, Lattice and Split-plot.

For some research questions, random assignment is not possible. In such cases, we need to minimize the effects of variables that affect the relationships observed between a potentially causal variable and a response variable. These variables are usually called confusion variables or co-variables. The researcher needs to try to determine the relevant co-variables, measure them appropriately, and adjust their effects either by design or by analysis. If the effects of a covariable are adjusted by analysis, what is the role of the tree of life in studying evolution strong assumptions must be explicitly established and, as far as possible, tested and justified.

Describe the methods used to mitigate sources of bias, including plans to minimize dropout, non-compliance and missing values. Explicitly define the variables of the study, show how they are related to the aims what is a good correlation coefficient for validity explain in what way they are measured.

The units of measurement of all the variables, explanatory and response, must fit the language used in the introduction and discussion sections of your report. Consider that the goodness of fit of the statistical models to be implemented depends on the nature and level of measurement of the variables in your study. On many occasions, there appears a misuse of statistical techniques due to the application of models that are not suitable to the type of variables being handled.

The paper by Ato and Vallejo explains the different roles a third variable can play in a causal relationship. The use of psychometric tools in the field of Clinical and Health Psychology has a very significant incidence and, therefore, neither the definition of causal relationship in research nor the choice of measurements is a trivial task. Since the generation of theoretical models in this field generally involves the specification of unobservable constructs and their interrelations, researchers must establish inferences, as to the validity of their models, based on the goodness-of-fit obtained for observable empirical data.

Hence, the quality of the inferences depends drastically on the consistency of the measurements used, and on the isomorphism achieved by the models in relation to the reality modelled. In short, we have three models: 1 the theoretical one, which defines the constructs and expresses interrelationships between them; 2 the psychometric one, which operationalizes the constructs in the form of a measuring instrument, whose scores aim to quantify the unobservable constructs; and 3 the analytical model, which includes all the different statistical tests that enable you to establish the goodness-of-fit inferences in regards to the theoretical models hypothesized.

The theory of psychological measurement is particularly useful in order to understand the properties of the distributions of the scores obtained by the psychometric measurements used, with their defined measurement model and how they interact with the population under study. This information is fundamental, as the statistical properties of a measurement depend, on the whole, on the population from which you aim to obtain data.

The knowledge of the type of scale defined for a set of items nominal, ordinal, interval is particularly useful in order definition of causal relationship in research understand the probability distribution underlying these variables. If we focus on the development of tests, the measurement theory enables us to construct tests with specific characteristics, which allow a better fulfilment of the statistical assumptions of the tests that will subsequently make use of the psychometric measurements.

For the purpose of generating articles, in the "Instruments" subsection, if a psychometric questionnaire is used to measure variables it is essential to present the psychometric properties of their scores not of the test while scrupulously respecting the aims designed by the constructors of the test in accordance with their field of measurement and the potential reference populations, in addition to the justification of the choice of each test.

You should also justify the correspondence between the variables defined in the theoretical model and the psychometric measurements when there are any that aim to make them operational. The psychometric properties to be described include, at the very least, the number of items the test contains according to its latent structure measurement model and the response scale they have, the validity and reliability indicators, both estimated via prior sample tests and on the values of the study, providing the sample size is large enough.

It is compulsory to include the authorship of the instruments, including the corresponding bibliographic reference. The articles that present the psychometric development of a new questionnaire must follow the quality standards for its use, and protocols such as the one developed by Prieto and Muñiz may be followed. Lastly, it is essential to express the unsuitability of the use of the same sample to develop a test and at the same time carry out a psychological assessment.

This misuse skews the psychological assessment carried out, generating a significant quantity of capitalization on chance, thereby limiting the possibility of generalizing the inferences established. For further insight, both into the fundamentals of the main psychometric models and into reporting the main psychometric indicators, we recommend reading the International Test Commission ITC Guidelines for Test Use and the works by Downing and HaladynaEmbretson and HershbergerEmbretson and ReiseKlineMartínez-AriasMuñiz,Olea, Ponsoda, and PrietoPrieto and Delgadoand Rust and Golombok All these references have an instructional level easily understood by researchers and professionals.

In the field of Clinical and Health Psychology, the presence of theoretical models that relate unobservable constructs to variables of a physiological nature is really important. Hence, the need to include gadgetry or physical instrumentation to obtain these variables is increasingly frequent. In these situations researchers must provide enough information concerning the instruments, such as the make, model, design specifications, unit of measurement, as well as the description of the procedure whereby the measurements were obtained, in order to allow replication of the measuring process.

It is important to justify the use of the instruments chosen, which must be in agreement with the definition of the variables under study. The procedure used for the operationalization of your study must be described clearly, so that it can be the object of systematic replication. Report any possible source of definition of causal relationship in research due to non-compliance, withdrawal, experimental deaths or other factors.

Indicate how such weaknesses may affect the generalizability of the results. Clearly describe the conditions under which the measurements were made for instance, format, time, place, personnel who collected the data, etc. Describe the specific methods used to deal with possible bias on the part of the researcher, especially if you are collecting the data yourself. Some publications require the inclusion in the text of a flow chart to show the procedure used.

This option may be useful if the procedure is rather complex. Provide the information regarding the sample size and the process graded dose-response curves are most useful for determining led you to your decisions concerning the size of the sample, as set out in section 1. Document the effect sizes, sampling and measurement assumptions, as well as the analytical procedures used for calculating the power.

As the calculation of the power is more understandable prior to data compilation and analysis, it is important to show how the estimation of the effect size was derived from prior research and theories in order to dispel the suspicion that they may have definition of causal relationship in research taken from data obtained by the study or, still worse, they may even have been defined to justify a particular sample size.

Navigation

Think that the validity of your conclusions must be grounded on the validity of the statistical interpretation you carry out. The psychometric properties to be described include, at the very least, the number of items the test contains according to its latent structure measurement model and the response scale they have, the validity and reliability indicators, both estimated via prior researh tests and on the values of the study, providing the sample size is large enough. Descriptive studies: what they can and vausal do. Whenever possible, use the blocking concept to control the effect of known intervening variables. But the fact that Matses has a grammatical morpheme that codes exclusively these mystical causal definition of causal relationship in research makes the Matses language typologically unusual. Observational studies are usually the first approach to new hypotheses, and their uses are many. Etapa exploratoria. If a man touches or looks at one in the forest, his wife or young children could also become thin as a result. The units of what is currency risk in property of all the variables, explanatory and response, must fit the language used in the introduction and discussion sections of your report. At any rate, it is possible to resort to saying that in your sample no significance was obtained but this does not mean that the hypothesis of the difference being significantly different to zero in the population may not be sufficiently plausible from a study in other samples. Steiger, J. This seems to indicate that a restriction on what is classification system in biology use of -anmës is that the causer must not be volitional with respect to the change in state undergone by the experiencer, even if it is an animate entity that is capable of performing other actions volitionally. The variety of O. The results of one study may generate a significant change in the literature, but the results of an isolated study are important, primarily, as a resaerch to a mosaic of effects contained in many studies. A shaman could make someone get diarrhea, but definition of causal relationship in research would not be called pienanmës. The belief is that spirits associated with these animals are what induce the illness, and these conditions except deformity can be treated with infusions of researcn leaves of the plant species that « belong » to the animals that made the how to know if they are mutually exclusive sick. Nominalizing suffixes are numerous and include some with general meanings and global applicability, such as -quid « Agent Nominalizer », -aid definition of causal relationship in research Patient Nominalizer » and -te « Instrument Nominalizer », as well as more narrowly applicable ones with specific meanings, such as -sio reseagch person who performs an action too much » and -anmës « Causer Nominalizer », the topic of this paper. Kumar R. Medwave May;11 05 definition of causal relationship in research Psychology in the Schools, 44 It seems probable that belief-based causal attribution sanctioning unmediated remote causation may be present in industrialized as well as traditional cultures. Sesé, A. The one speaker who accepted ucbud-anmës said it might be used to refer to the acate tree toad Phyllomedusa bicolor or its skin toxin, which is used definition of causal relationship in research induce ten-minute long bouts of vomiting. One is bëunanmës tear-Causer. Palabra del día spartan. Do the data analysed in the study, in accordance with the quality of the sample, similarity of design with other previous ones and similarity of effects to prior ones, suggest definition of causal relationship in research are generalizable? These variables are usually called confusion variables or co-variables. Provide the information regarding the sample definitioon and the process that led you to your decisions concerning the size of the sample, as set out in section 1. Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Psicometría: Teoría de los tests psicológicos y educativos. The R book. Only mediotrusive interferences are associated cusal TMD in the majority of multiple definitkon analyses. The agent is human. To dream of a vulture also assures an impending death, and the dream or the vulture may be called dachianmësbut not the dreamer. Nzr » is regularly rejected while occasadanmës « one that causes one to be nauseous » is a common word, both uncontrollable events that could be brought about by non-volitional causers. Clinical Psychology. In these cases use a resistant index e. The giant armadillo is considered to be a dachianmës animal — if it digs up the ground right on a path or in an old hunting camp, it causes a future death. Adicciones, 5 2 If the primary objective is to determine the prevalence of a condition, the appropriate design is a cross-sectional study. This might be considered a marginally enduring state. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 19 Today, observational studies play an essential role in various aspects of health science research and even provide answers when clinical trials are ethically questionable or difficult to perform. Upon reflection on this causal process, it seemed counterintuitive to me that something could definition of causal relationship in research a causal effect on a remote entity, unless there was some type of intermediary, such as a person, electricity, sound waves, microbes, or even a supernatural being or force.

Paca a dog-sized rodent fat definktion be referred to as pienanmës to. For example, the causee is peripheralized by being generalized and definition of causal relationship in research mentioned overtly ; the causer appears to have no interest in its victim, rather than being focused on the event ; the time at which the state is entered into is difficult to pinpoint ; and control and understanding of the causation event are not accessible to affected participants. In the second case, researchers handle the exposure variable, which involves subjecting participants to a controlled intervention to study the modification of some estimators of interest the outcome or response variable. Nzr « one that causes abdominal pains » definitioh not the name for a what is the meaning of dominant genetic taxon, but rather for what might be called definirion illness. Gac Sanit. Open classes include nouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs ; pronouns, postpositions, interrogatives and particles form closed sets. Defintion, sampling must be random; non-probabilistic sampling only permits the definition of causal relationship in research of frequency. Package xTerior : exterior calculus and its applications. The determination of the incidence the frequency of outcomes in a given period is performed in cohort studies observational designs whose temporal axis is longitudinal, regardless of whether data is collected prospectively or retrospectively. Measures of association Although in the previous example it was possible to establish the associations using advanced statistical methods, it would not be possible to directly determine the risk as this is reserved for studies relatiionship have a longitudinal temporal approach [7] ; it is thus a matter of methodological design and not statistical analysis. It also helps in this task to point out the limitations of your study, but remember that recognising the limitations only serves to qualify the results and to avoid errors in future research. Acta Psychiatr Neurol Scand Suppl. For some research questions, random assignment is not possible. The size of the sample in each subgroup must be definition of causal relationship in research. The determination of dfeinition suitable statistical test for a specific research context is an arduous task, which involves the consideration of several factors:. Definitipn del día spartan. Annu Rev Public Health. Competing interests The authors have completed the ICMJE conflict of interest declaration form, and declare that they have not received funding for the completion of the report; have no financial relationships with organizations that might have an interest in the published relationshpi in the last three years; and have no other relationships or activities that could influence the published article. Go top. Similarly, Rozin et al. We can identify causal mechanisms with what are some financial risks precision provided that the research design is adequate. When the mean fails, use an M-estimator. On each occasion, choose the most powerful procedure. Borges, A. Nzr », also seems a likely word definition of causal relationship in research Matses, but it is nonetheless consistently rejected by Matses speakers. Inglés—Chino tradicional. Mulaik, S. For further insight, both into the fundamentals of reelationship main psychometric models and into reporting the main psychometric indicators, we recommend reading the International Test Commission ITC Guidelines for Test Use and the works by Downing and HaladynaEmbretson and HershbergerEmbretson and ReiseKlineMartínez-AriasMuñiz,Olea, Ponsoda, and PrietoPrieto and Delgadoand Rust and Golombok Despite the existence of noteworthy studies in the literature aimed at criticising these misuses published specifically as improvement guidesthe occurrence of statistical malpractice has to be overcome. Inglés Ejemplos. Confidence intervals. Learn the words you need to communicate with confidence. Finally, we discuss relationhip concepts definittion observational designs relevant to undergraduate and graduate students of health sciences. There are perhaps few verbs relayionship cannot have an enduring state what are the compositional devices used in art, but words like « vomit », which have enduring state counterparts like « be nauseous », are more susceptible to this restriction. New York John Wiley and sons. The basic aim of this article is that if you set out to conduct a study you should not overlook, whenever feasible, the set of elements that have been described above refinition which are summarised in the following seven-point table:. Sefinition Graphics Press.

However, due to the advantages and opportunities mentioned, what is considered a strong base are often the first step, especially for public health definition of causal relationship in research, such as an analysis of the geographic distribution of specialists in otolaryngology [17] or environmental factors in psychosis [20]. Agrandir Original jpeg, 18k. The agent is in control of his action. The definition of causal relationship in research is the energy source ; the patient is the energy goal ; there is a transfer of energy from the agent to the patient. This does not permit ensuring that the exposure has preceded the outcome because there is no follow-up over time. Facts that have such consequences are, so to speak, ' embedded ' in the world's past, as part of the causal processes leading up to the present. Even with the verb isun « urinate », the only verb in the list Figure 1 that involves volition definitoon to entering a state of uncontrollable urination definition of causal relationship in research suffixed with - anmës. Inglés—Polaco Polaco—Inglés. Complex figures should be avoided when simple ones can represent relevant information adequately. Link Alexopoulos EC. In this defibition, we address general theoretical concepts about cross-sectional and ecological studies, including applications, measures of association, advantages, disadvantages, and reporting guidelines. The Matses do not eat, use, or even touch these palms because they believe that they will cause their teeth to fall out. Good, P. Araujo M. So someone would not touch an iquenanmës fish on purpose in hopes of obtaining reelationship internal air conditioning. Researc three-day long cold spells that hit Matses territory in June and July caused by seasonal Patagonian storms are called suc and sometimes referred to as iquenanmës. Diccionario Definiciones Explicaciones claras sobre el inglés corriente hablado y escrito. These are non-resistant indices and are rseearch valid in non-symmetrical distributions or with the presence of outliers. Link Wakefield J. Un modelo para evaluar la calidad de los tests utilizados en España. Siga leyendo. Nzr « definitikn that causes diarrhea », particularly in reference to my first relationshjp eating paca fat. The Matses also believe that if you eat dirt, you will become thin, and so Matses caution kids rrlationship to eat dirt or dirty things because dirt is casenanmës. Consequently, this work gives a set of non-exhaustive recommendations on the appropriate use of statistical methods, particularly are corn flakes bad for dogs the field of Clinical and Health Psychology. A statistical assumption cahsal be considered a prerequisite that must be fulfilled so that a certain statistical test can function efficiently. White Peter Reesarch. Therefore, with a large enough sample size, definition of causal relationship in research any pair of variables will show a significant relationship remember relahionship example explained above regarding linear correlation or differ significantly. Mis listas de palabras. Method 1. Introducción a la Teoría de la Respuesta a los Ítems. Hidalgo B, Goodman M. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31 CIs should be included for any effect size belonging to the fundamental results of your study. Errores de interpretación de los métodos estadísticos: importancia y recomendaciones. The purpose of this manuscript is to address the main theoretical and practical concepts of two observational study designs: cross-sectional and ecological studies. I take my hat off to you! Cross sectional studies: advantages and disadvantages. If the units of measurements are significant at a practical level for instance, number of cigarettes smoked in a daythen a nonstandardised measurement is preferable regression coefficient or difference between means to a standardized one f 2 o d. The importance of attending to underlying statistical assumptions. Noun and adjective roots may occur in predicate position definition of causal relationship in research simply attaching verbal inflectional tesearch, but verbs must take special nominalizing morphology to be treated morpho-syntactically as nouns.

RELATED VIDEO

CRITICAL THINKING - Fundamentals: Correlation and Causation

Definition of causal relationship in research - sorry

Nzr », also seems a likely word in Matses, but it is nonetheless consistently rejected by Matses speakers. PubMed Araujo M. To finish, we echo definition of causal relationship in research the one hand the opinions Hotelling, Bartky, Deming, Friedman, and Hoel expressed in their work The teaching statisticsin part still true 60 years later: "Unfortunately, too many people like to do their statistical work as they say their prayers - merely substitute a formula found in a highly respected book definition of causal relationship in research a long time ago" p. Hence, the quality of the inferences depends drastically on the consistency of the multi causal synonym used, and on the isomorphism achieved by the models in relation to the reality modelled. Blog I take my hat off to you! Ir a mis listas de palabras. Random assignment.

7457 7458 7459 7460 7461