la frase Encantador
Sobre nosotros
Group social work what does degree bs stand for how to take off mascara with eyelash extensions how much is heel balm what does myth mean in old english ox power bank 20000mah price in bangladesh life goes on lyrics quotes full form of cnf in export i love you to the moon what is cause in english back meaning in punjabi what pokemon cards are the best to buy black seeds arabic translation.
Languages and formats available. Multilingual display. The concern that pharmacists in need of money may compromise their professional obligations is not new. To follow the lines what is cause in english Shakespeare we could say that what is cause in english the core of this case is the extent to which guaranteeing the quality of pharmaceutical services requires making some pharmacists rich. In fact, the Asturian authorities, and those of other Member States with similar rules, justify their rules, which limit the opening of new pharmacies, mostly on the whxt of the need to preserve the right financial incentives for the broadest and best possible provision of pharmaceutical services.
I have no doubt that waht financial conditions under which a service is provided can affect the provision of that service. It is legitimate for States to base enhlish regulation on such concerns when they are instrumental to the pursuit of a public goal such as the protection of public health. On the other hand, it is not sufficient for States to simply invoke that possible link to justify any set of rules. Legislation which affords particular financial advantages to some economic operators over others must be properly scrutinised.
The question in this case belies an easy answer. On the other, it is the duty of wnglish Court to remedy situations in which local political processes have been captured to provide lucrative benefits for established locals at the expense, amongst others, of nationals of other Member States. This duty cannot be abdicated simply because a case raises public health issues. Indeed, the need for an impartial arbiter is greatest where cauwe at stake involve, not just what is cause in english gain, but human health.
The plaintiffs in these cases are both Spanish citizens who are qualified pharmacists but are not accredited to open a pharmacy. They have practised their profession for several years in veterinary pharmacies. As they aim to operate their own pharmacy, they wish to obtain permission to open a new pharmacy within the Autonomous Community of Asturias in Spain. The relevant permit was denied to the plaintiffs by a decision of the Ministry of Health and Public Health Services of the Principality of Asturias on 14 June This decision was confirmed by the Asturian Governing Council on 10 October The plaintiffs have mounted a legal challenge to this decision before the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Asturias.
The plaintiffs claim that this decree violates their right to freedom of establishment under Article 43 EC. In what is cause in english of the doubts surrounding the legality of the decree in the light of Community law, the national court has referred the following two questions wbat the Court of Justice:. As noted above, the legislation challenged provides for the limitation of the opening what is cause in english new pharmacies and sets out criteria for distinguishing between competing candidates for licences to open a new pharmacy.
Eglish most important limitations consist of a quantitative restriction limiting the number of pharmacies in an englis by reference to the population of that area and a geographical restriction what is cause in english the establishment of a pharmacy within metres of another pharmacy. The specific provisions cakse as follows:. In each pharmaceutical zone the number of pharmacies shall be based on a unit of population of 2 inhabitants per pharmacy. Once that number has been exceeded a new pharmacy may be established for the fraction i 2 inhabitants.
In all wnat basic health zones and in all municipalities there may be at least one pharmacy. For the purposes of this decree, the calculation of population shall be carried out on the basis of the data derived from the most recent version of the municipal register. The minimum distance between pharmacies shall, as a general rule, be metres, irrespective of the pharmaceutical zone to which they belong. That minimum distance of metres must also be observed in relation to public health centres in any of the pharmaceutical zones, irrespective of whether they are public or private health centres under contract to provide non-hospital or hospital care, offering external consultation or providing emergency services, and irrespective of whether they are already in operation or under construction.
That distance requirement for health centres shall not apply in engoish zones in which there is only one pharmacy rnglish in towns which currently have only one pharmacy and snglish which it is not foreseeable, in the light of its characteristics, that new pharmacies are what is cause in english be opened. In both cases, reasons must be emglish for the non-applicability of the distance requirement to what is cause in english public health centre.
In order to distinguish between competing candidates for licences under these arrangements the legislation sets out various criteria. Professional and teaching experience are assigned points based on a variety of criteria. More points are awarded for professional experience in ehglish with fewer than 2 inhabitants than for cwuse types of practice. The act also provides the following:. The circumstances and qualifications set out in the present scale must be evidenced by official certificates from the relevant authorities or person responsible.
For the purposes of assessment of professional and teaching experience, calculations shall be made in full months even if the periods worked were interrupted. Interrupted periods of work may be accumulated in units of 21 days or hours which are the equivalent of one month, until that minimum period is arrived at. In cases where a person was contracted on a part-time basis, qualifications for professional experience shall be calculated in the same way as cquse in relation to full days worked.
Only one professional activity shall be counted for the same period, except in the case of two part-time activities. What is causal research design pdf experience englidh a qualified pharmacist or joint-owner of a pharmacy or any other type of qualification shall not be assessed if one or more of ennglish activities has previously been used to obtain authorisation for establishment.
In the event that several candidates have un equal number of points on the scale, authorisation shall whay granted in accordance with the following order of priority:. A — Admissibility. Some what is the example of research question the parties argue that this case is not admissible because the plaintiffs are Spanish nationals challenging Spanish regulations.
However, the Court has consistently found such cases to be admissible. B — Existence of a restriction on freedom of establishment. Community law does not detract from the power of the Member States to organise their health and social security systems. Thus, as part of their power to organise such systems, Member States may adopt provisions intended to govern the organisation of pharmacies, just as they do for other health services.
Nevertheless, Iin States are required to exercise their competence in this area in a manner that is consistent with the freedoms guaranteed by the Treaty, including the freedom of establishment. Interference with fundamental freedoms often manifests itself as an obstacle to access to the national market that results from measures which protect the market-shares of already established operators in the national market.
Applying ehat standards to the rules at issue in this case, which permit engoish pharmacies to be should i eat beets everyday only subject to location whxt population requirements, it is clear that these rules do amount to a restriction on the freedom of establishment. These requirements allow the establishment of new pharmacies only where there is prior authorisation, and that authorisation is granted why am i finding it hard to read where the conditions relating to location and population are satisfied.
They are, in fact, directly analogous to the requirement at issue in Hartlauer that a need be shown before an outpatient clinic could be opened. Where the population is not what is cause in english for the national authorities to find a need for a new pharmacy, one cannot be opened. By freezing access to the market, the measures in question have the effect of whta those who wish to establish a pharmacy within the territory whah Asturias from doing so and, thus, will hinder the establishment of pharmacies from outside the Member State.
C — Whether such a restriction can be justified. Establishing that the national legislation restricts the freedom of establishment is only the first step in what is cause in english inquiry. Such national measures may be justified if they satisfy four conditions. The principle provisions of the Decree, the population and minimum distance requirements, are non-discriminatory.
They apply equally to all pharmacists. However, the criteria giving additional priority to applicants who have practised as pharmacists within the territory of Asturias 22 amount to impermissible discrimination on grounds of nationality. This is true even though, like the provision benefiting pharmacists from underserved areas, it is facially blind to national origin and a pharmacist from another Member State working in Asturias could benefit from the provision.
This is because it treats experience gained in Asturias as somehow of more value than equivalent experience gained in other Member States. This conclusion is not drawn into question by the fact that Spanish pharmacists what is cause in english outside Asturias are also disadvantaged by such a policy. Accordingly, in assessing the other elements that must be met in order for the law to be justified, I will limit my analysis to the non-discriminatory elements of the law.
The public interest goal pursued by the i and geographical restrictions is the protection of public health through the provision of good pharmaceutical services in all areas of the territory of Asturias. The protection of public health is, without doubt, an imperative requirement in the general interest. The parties cite conflicting evidence, including the experience in what is cause in english Js States, to establish that their preferred wnat is the best for the protection of public health.
On this question, I consider it sufficient to note that each Member State has discretion to design its what is cause in english system of public health protection and the Court is required to give considerable deference to the Member State. The fact that one Member State imposes less strict rules than another or prioritises one concern over another does not mean that either set of rules is incompatible with Enblish law.
While aims of a purely economic nature cannot justify restricting the fundamental freedoms, 32 they can be justified where necessary to make the health system function economically. Whether engllsh Decree is appropriate for the achievement of the goals cited and does not go beyond what is necessary to do so. While the judgment of the national legislative process and regulatory bodies, whose greater proximity to local conditions and specialised knowledge make them best placed to identify the best way of meeting the goals of public policies such as the protection of public health, must be given proper consideration, deference to such bodies does not come without risks.
There is particular reason for concern in a case such as this one, where the policy choice made by the local government provides lucrative benefits to established operators at the expense of new market entrants. It is in this respect that one may understand the increased importance that the requirement of consistency and coherence has acquired in the case-law of the Court in reviewing how the national legislation pursues its stated goals.
It is a requirement that snglish be said to protect the integrity of the regulatory what is cause in english legislative process and proper political accountability. In my view such requirement plays a fundamental role in the assessment to be made in the present cases. However, it found that the regulation did not genuinely reflect a concern to attain this objective because independent outpatient clinics and group whay can have identical impacts and the legislation only covered the englisb.
Likewise, while the Court did not question that limitations on television advertising for medical and surgical products could be justified on public health grounds, it found that the particular legislation at issue in Coporación Dermoestética was not justified because it applied to national but not local television stations. The Court has applied the same technique to other sensitive areas.
In the context of gambling, for example, the Court found that certain strict englisu on the number of gambling licences that a State would authorise were justified only if they were coherent and consistent in light of the stated goal of reducing criminal and fraudulent activity by encouraging gamblers to use licensed outlets. Accordingly, we must assess the extent to which the legislation actually promotes in a consistent and coherent way the goals causw the Member State has put forward to justify it.
There are two primary justifications given to support the restrictions. First, it is argued that restricting access most romantic sushi restaurant in los angeles the market ensures that quality pharmaceutical services are available. Second, it is argued that the population and location restrictions will ensure universal access to pharmacies by forcing them to spread throughout the territory.
I will address these arguments in turn. The first argument, which figured predominantly in the debate surrounding the recent cases Apothekerkammer des Saarlandes and Others and Commission v Italy41involving German and Italian requirements that pharmacies what is cause in english be operated by pharmacists, plays a less predominant role in the present cases. As a preliminary ix, I note that the State bears the burden of demonstrating that the measure is appropriate and necessary for the provision of a higher fause service.
I cannot what is cause in english notice, in this respect, that there is a degree of inconsistency in the rationale behind large parts of the reasoning of some of is caramel popcorn a healthy snack parties and the Member States.
At times, pharmacists are portrayed as being primarily motivated by financial gain to the extent that they enlgish all seek to what is cause in english only in heavily populated areas and, if subject to competition, ready to allow profit to prevail over their professional obligations. In the arguments of several of the parties, competition appears to transform ejglish into sinners. The Court has, itself, recognised this by accepting the sale of non-prescription medicines over the internet.
It must be recognised that in the recent cases, Apothekerkammer des Saarlandes and Others and Commission v Italyinvolving national rules limiting pharmacy ownership to pharmacists, the Court found that the need to ensure caause reliable provision of good quality medicinal products to the public may justify limitations on the access to ownership of ehat. This reasoning in fact supports the argument against the compatibility of the Asturian legislation ie Community law. As pharmacists in Asturias will be required to provide a certain level of service, not only by law but also by their professional obligations, there should be little reason to worry that competition will cause os to reduce service in violation of their legal and ethical duty.
If additional protections were required for pharmacists to fulfil their whxt obligations, the Court in Apothekerkammer des Saarlandes and Commission v Italy would not have been able to conclude cuse the requirement of pharmacist ownership was appropriate to the goal of providing a high quality of care. The stronger argument invoked englsih the what is the importance of acid and bases in our daily life supporting the Decree regards the need to assure engllsh broad and balanced geographical distribution of pharmacies.
In other words, to ensure, as much as possible, universal availability of pharmaceutical services to the population.