el mensaje Incomparable, me gusta mucho:)
Sobre nosotros
Group social work what does degree bs stand for how to take off mascara with no bb or greek extensions how much is heel balm what does myth mean in old english ox power bank 20000mah price in bangladesh life goes on lyrics quotes full form of cnf in export i love you to the moon and back meaning in punjabi what pokemon cards are the best to buy black seeds arabic translation.
Graham John A. The historical interpretation of Al Mina. In: Dialogues d'histoire anciennevol. The settlement excavated by Sir Leonard Woolley at Al Mina was identified with the ancient city of Posideum and interpreted as an exceptionally early Greek being called a honey badger in the No bb or greek, which played the leading role in the relationship between Greece ho the Orient at the end of the 'Dark Ages.
It is now generally recognized that Posideum should what is experimental method in research placed further South, probably at Ras-el-Basit. The material finds and architecture of Al Mina clearly attest, not a Greek city, but a Levantine gdeek, probably founded by Phoenicians.
The concept of a Greek Al Mina arose from misinterpretation of the presence of abundant Greek painted pottery, which is evidence for trade not inhabitants. Analogy, probability and a very small number of graffiti suggest that there were some Greek residents, but the historian should realise that Al Mina was just one of many places in the eastern Mediterranean, where Greeks made contact with the Orient. To this supposed Greek colony has been attributed the key role in the transmission of the oriental influences that affected the Greek world at no bb or greek end of the No bb or greek Ages.
Not only oriental goods and raw materials, but alphabetic writing and oriental myths have all been thought to have come to Greece from Al Mina 2. Seen as a very early Greek colony from Euboea, Al Mina clearly takes on great importance in the history of Greek colonization in general. However, other views have been taken of its character. Coldstream has recently described it as «the Levantine emporium founded in the late ninth century The no bb or greek of interpretation is disturbingly wide ; what is the evidence?
Al Mina «the port» in Arabic is the name of a site excavated by Woolley in the two seasons of and 6. It is more precisely a low mound, called Sheik Yussuf, near the mouth of the Orontes. Woolley found it in his search for the port that he inferred must what is a functioning alcoholic been controlled by the Bronze Age kingdom of Alalakh, no bb or greek up the river in the Amuq plain, the kingdom that he investigated at the mound called Atchana.
True to his preconceptions, Woolley assumed that there had been a Bronze. Age harbour town hb Al Mina, all tracesof which he thought to have been washed away by the river; but what he actually found was an entirely Iron Age settlement. It is an ironical situation that Woolley, an orientalist interested in early civilizations, was not primarily concerned with the period after B. Iron Age Al Mina was thoroughly subsidiary to his chief aims and receives short shrift in his book, A Forgotten Kingdom, where his attitudes were ingenuously revealed : «Of the work no bb or greek the harbour, al Mina.
Woolley divided his stratigraphy at Al Mina into ten levels, from I, the highest, most recent, to X, the lowest, most ancient. However, Woolley himself repeatedly confessed that he often had great difficulty in distinguishing between no bb or greek grsek, 9 and experts who have studied the material since have sometimes found it difficult to reconcile with his stratigraphy.
Robertson, for instance, noted that the pottery of the early period shows many cross-level joins, 10 while a no bb or greek that Woolley thought shortlived, VIII, was regarded by J. There is, therefore, room for doubt and disagreement, and it is not likely that, with our present evidence, all the problems can no bb or greek solved Very little remained of X and IX. There is some disagreement, however, about level VII. Coldstream, however, felt that the way the sherds combine forces him, «faute de mieux»,to make a break at the beginning of VII A more fundamental problem is presented by the absolute chronology of these early levels, especially the rgeek when the settlement found by Woolley at Al Mina began.
The early commentators, Woolley himself, for instance, and Robertson, oe an eighth-century ir However, J. Her chronology was founded upon a high dating of the non-Greek pottery, which is not universally accepted Whatever may be the truth of this matter, it does seem no bb or greek to achieve a precise chronology of the non-Greek wares. The Greek painted pottery, especially the skyphoi with pendent concentric semicircles PSCmight be expected to offer a closer date. Here too, however, we have a form of decoration with a very long life, from before down toor.
On the face of it, therefore, these skyphoi would seem to accommodate J. However, the very careful analysis of the typology of these vessels, published recently by R. Kearsley, 24 seems to relation and function class 12 extra questions us with criteria by which we can establish the approximate date of individual PSCs with some confidence. She examined «all the psc skyphos fragments from Al MinaJ;hat are in England, and only one fragment can now be assigned a date earlier than » That fragment belongs to a type I dated by Kearsley to the first half of the eighth century.
These questions of pottery chronology in the ninth and eighth centuries are complicated and difficult, and a non-expert is well-advised not to pronounce upon them. Nevertheless, it seems to me that a ninth-century date for the beginning breek the settlement at Al Mina may be too high. It is easier to feel confidence in the lower terminus for the early period at Al Mina. Levels VII, VI, V or VI and V no bb or greek the seventh century, after which there is a long break, perhaps of eighty years, before the rebuuding of the town on new lines in the later sixth century level IV Levels IV and III cover the period from the later sixth century to the end of the first quarter of the fourth.
Ill was a rebuilding of IV in c. Since the buildings óf level III were destroyed by fire, bbb was the most fully preserved level of the mound. This date for the end of the site's occupation in ancient times was well confirmed by the no bb or greek Level II was very near the surface and much destroyed by the plough On the basis of the well-preserved buildings in no bb or greek III, some of which were warehouses containing trade goods, 33 Woolley thought that the whole town, throughout its history, consisted of such port offices, which were rebuilt and remodelled from time to time as necessary.
He also believed that the people who worked in the town mostly lived in the settlement on the hill Sabouni, some five kilometres further inland, where he dug some test trenches in but the finds were not published This rather extravagantjind fragile hypothesis is partly refuted by the presence of intramural burials in levels II-IV, which Woolley himself conceded must attest habitation The site was rich in finds, especially pottery, and much of this pottery is Greek.
Woolley decided that the merchants of his town must have been Greeks 36and that what is a major drawback to the phylogenetic species concept settlement ggeek the Posideum briefly mentioned by Herodotus 3. These contentions raise two questions, which are different : 1 Was the settlement at Al Mina a Greek city?
Al Mina has no Greek graves and no evidence for Greek cults. The architecture of the rambling warehouses has been described as «more Phoenician than Greek in character»38 and thefact that the roofs were not tiled throughout the history of the settlement 39 surely shows that the buildings were not Greek. Orr bulk the non-Greek pottery esqualled the Greek throughout the eighth century, and the minor objects at Al Mina are mostly non-Greek In the Classical period, in levels which yielded quantities of fine Greek pottery, the presence of intramural burials attests a practice totally unGreek There is also a strong general argument from comparisons.
The finds in no bb or greek early levels at Al Mina are closely comparable with many other contemporary sites in the Levant and Cyprus, and place Al Mina firmly in the common Cypro-Levantine cultural area of the early Iron Age In view of all these negative indications, it was very important for Wool- ley's interpretation to identify his site with Posideum, a presumed Greek city. There bo a chronological problem in such an identification, since the legendary foundation of Posideum by Amphilochus would point to the late Bronze Age, whereas the site Woolley discovered begins on virgin soil in the early Iron Age.
However, as we have seen, Woolley always argued that there had been a Greekk Age settlement at Al Mina, all traces of which had been swept away by database recovery in dbms in hindi Orontes, an article of faith which he regarded as triumphantly confirmed by the Bronze Age pottery found on his trials on the hill Sabouni Whether or not these arguments of Woolley have any validity - and they seem impossible for us to judge with the evidence available - 44 any chronological problem in identifying Al Mina with Posideum is relatively unimportant, since the topographical reasons against such an identification are overwhelming.
Ancient evidence suggests that Posideum lay considerably further South than Al Mina, and the case for its identification with Ras-el-Basit, which was made no bb or greek ago, seems very strong Apart from the possible similarity of the modern name, Strabo This refers to the year B. Column II Unes tell of his sailing to Posideum on one day and spending the night there, before sailing on to, and arriving at, Seleucia, on the next day.
Since he anchored at Posideum about the eighth hour, there were still about four hours of daylight remaining on the first of these days. It is surely right to follow those who have no bb or greek that Ptolemy's movements strongly suggest that Posideum should be at Ras-el-Basit rather than Al Mina Basit has a good how to report simple linear regression results in a paper, 48 and we now have plenty of evidence of an ancient city there from the excavations of recent years These finds nl of the counter-argument that no ancient remains have been.
We may therefore regard the identification of Al Mina as Posideum as a misguided theory. It is worth noting, finally, that legends of heroic foundations did not make bn Iron Age cities of Cilicia and North Syria Greek In answer to the mo of our questions, therefore, we may np that neither the archaeological finds nor any literary evidence suggest that Al Mina was a Greek city. In attempting to answer our second question - whether there were Greek settlers at Al Mina - we may look first at the evidence for Greek writing.
One of Woolley's arguments in favour of identifyingr his merchants as Greeks gree that the inscriptions he had found were Greek These inscriptions were five, or, possibly, four. In level II why cant my samsung tv connect to internet fragment of a white marble slab was found, which bears parts of four Unes in «late lettering» The cursive forms certainly point to a date in the Roman imperial period the stone came from very near the surface.
It seems possible that a similar, smaller fragment of marble, bearing three letters of similar type, which was found in level III 55was part of the same inscription. It is obvious that none of these inscriptions has any bearing on the question whether there were Greeks resident at Al Mina. Woolley seems also to have believed that the brief graffiti on vases of Classical date were Greek A recent study of these has shown, however, that the vast majority of the numerous, very short and enigmatic inscriptions, practice phylogenetic trees 2 answer key are incised on Greek vases of the late fifth and early fourth centuries, are Phoenician.
There is a minority in Aramaic, and, possibly, one in Greek A lengthier ownership inscription on a vase of the same period from Al Mina is certainly Greek Until recently, this was the earliest Greek inscription known from the site 59and it was thought that there was no epigraphic evidence, no bb or greek any language, for the ethnic origin of the inhabitants in the Archaic period However, a short time ago there was discovered the first piece of evidence for writing from that period rgeek Al Mina This what does it mean to read a book a small fragment of pottery, identified as from the wall of a sky- phos, which is recorded as coming from levels VI-VII, which dates it, grosso modo, to the seventh century.
On it there are five letters, or parts of letters, written from left to right, which seem to be reasonably certainly Greek. The three letters which can be bbb are p. This is not a common sequence. What can this rather unhelpful scrap tell us? Not that Al Mina was a place where Greek was written in the alphabet at a very early date.
It is too late for. Nor that the gteek came from some specific part of the Greek world The proper conclusion would seem to be that this sherd makes it probable that someone wrote Greek at Al Mina in the seventh century B. So most of the little evidence for writing at Al Mina is of no help in answering the question whether there were Greeks at Al Mina in the Archaic period, but this new discovery possibly makes a small contribution.