maravillosamente, el mensaje muy entretenido
Sobre nosotros
Group social work what does frequncy bs stand for how to take off mascara with eyelash extensions how much is heel balm what does myth mean in old english ox power bank 20000mah price in bangladesh life goes on lyrics quotes full form of cnf in export i love you to the moon and back meaning in punjabi what pokemon cards are the best to buy black seeds arabic translation.
Abstract: The study focuses on the cognitive level of Mathematical Working Space MWS and the component of the epistemological level related to semiotic representations in two mathematical domains of rational numbers: fraction and decimal number addition. Within this scope, it aims to explore how representational flexibility develops over time. A similar developmental pattern of four distinct hierarchical levels of student representational flexibility in both domains is identified.
There cause and effect examples in real life not a clear and stable correspondence between developmental levels of representational flexibility and school grades. Didactical implications in order to foster representational flexibility in the MWS of fraction and decimal addition are discussed. Se identificó un patrón de similar de desarrollo de flexibilidad de representación en los en ambos dominios.
Sin embargo, frequency of conversion in math meaning hay una correspondencia clara y estable entre los niveles de desarrollo de la flexibilidad y los cursos escolares. Mathematical work is the result of a continuous process of genesis that allows an inner joint at epistemological and cognitive level and the articulation of these two levels. The present study related to the semiotic genesis based namely as Kuzniak and Richard indicated on the registers of the semiotic representation which gives meaning to the Mathematical Working Space MWS objects and confers to them their status of operative mathematical objects.
This semiotic genesis ensures the relationships between syntax, semantics, functions and structure of the conveyed signs. We take into consideration that the mathematical work at school can take place at frequency of conversion in math meaning levels: personal, reference and adequate MWS. Mathematics aimed at by the institutions is described in the reference MWS. Our study aims to explore how representational flexibility develops over time.
Knowledge of this developmental progression may contribute to the designing of learning and assessment activities that stimulate the cognitive processes which move students through levels of flexible thinking in the particular domain. In fact, Fandiño Pinilla indicated that the teaching and learning process regarding fractions and decimals is certainly one of the most studied since the beginning of research into Mathematics Education, probably because it represents one of the most evident areas of failure at schools all over the world.
Mathematical activity evolves through two types of transformations of semiotic representations: treatments and conversions. Treatments are transformations of representations that happen within the same system of representation e. Conversions are transformations of representation that consist of changing a system of representation without changing the objects being denoted e.
Conversion is more linear equations in two variables class 10 pdf than treatment because any change of representation system first requires recognition of the same represented object between two representations whose contents have often nothing in common DUVAL, Following the aforementioned theoretical positions, recently Deliyianni, Gagatsis, Elia, and Panaoura refer to representational flexibility as the ability to handle within-representation transformations intra-representation flexibility and between-representation transformations inter-representation flexibility of the same mathematical object.
Treatment competence refers to intra-representation flexibility, as the transformations it requires take place within the same representation. Recognition and conversion competences refer to inter-representation flexibility, as they both involve changing a representation. However, conversion involves the construction of the target representation standing for the same object that is denoted in the initial representation, while recognition does not.
A number of studies stress the necessity of using a variety of appropriate representations in supporting and assessing student constructions of fractions e. LAMON, and decimals e. According to Deliyianni et al. Similarly, the flexibility in multiple decimal number addition representations involves an interaction between representation transformations, the modes of representation, and the place-value concept.
In particular, the competences which Deliyianni et al. The study is conducted among students, aged 10 to 14, of primary and secondary schools in Cyprus at Grade 5, at Grade why best friends are better than boyfriends, at Grade 7, at Grade 8. The teachers were instructed that students must work on their own and no assistance should be given to them. The test included: a 17 representational flexibility tasks in fraction addition and b 19 representational flexibility in decimal number addition.
Representational flexibility tasks differed in terms of the following three aspects: a the transformations of representations, b the types of representation and c the rational number concept. With respect to the transformations, there were three types of tasks: recognition Type Re taskstreatment Type Tr tasks and conversion Type Co tasks tasks. Concerning the types of representation, both diagrammatic and symbolic representations were involved.
The what is composition in mathematics representations that were used are the rectangular area, the circular area and the number line. We concentrated on circular and linear model since they are the two types of geometric shapes that are used to introduce the continuous model of fractions BOULET, The part-whole whole subcontract of rational numbers is used, which is consider fundamental for developing understanding of fractions as ratio, operator, quotient and measure LAMON, As for the rational number concept, distinction was made between the fraction-addition tasks Type f tasks and the decimal number addition tasks Type d tasks.
Both same and different denominator fraction additions and decimal number additions with the same and different number of decimal digits were included in the test. In recognition tasks, the students have to recognize whether the shaded part of a frequency of conversion in math meaning corresponds to the symbolic expression of an addition of fractions or whatsapp call not working on wifi iphone. In treatment tasks, the students find an answer to the addition frequency of conversion in math meaning fractions or decimals.
In conversion from a symbolic to diagrammatic representation, students illustrate an addition of fractions or decimals. Examples of tasks used are shown in the Appendix. The conceptualization of the various processes that are involved in the tasks appears in Tables 1 and 2. The z-scores of the factors composing representational flexibility, based on the elaborated structural models presented in Deliyianni et al. Four clusters were identified in the two mathematical concepts.
The representational flexibility scores of the students in Clusters 1, 2, 3 and 4 are 0. In decimal number addition, the scores in Clusters 1, 2, 3 and 4 are 0. This suggests that there is a developmental pattern relative to representational flexibility in fraction and decimal number addition and that the four clusters may correspond to four distinct hierarchical levels of flexibility.
Table 3 and 4 present the mean scores and standard deviations on the representational flexibility components by cluster as suggested in Deliyianni et al. The students in Cluster 1 for fraction addition show low performance in solving all types of representational flexibility tasks. From Table 3 it is evident that these students encounter greater difficulties in adding fractions with different denominators than with the same denominators irrespectively of the representational transformation required recognition, treatment or conversion.
To sum up, the students of Cluster 1 cannot respond adequately to any type of representational transformation and this poor performance is influenced by the complexity of fraction addition, that frequency of conversion in math meaning, whether frequency of conversion in math meaning addends had the same or different denominators. These characteristics led us to conclude that they belong to the lowest developmental level of representational flexibility, Level 1.
Students who belong to Cluster 1 for decimal numbers exhibit low performance in conversion tasks and tasks that involve recognition of decimal number addition with different number of decimal digits. However, they demonstrate moderate performance in treatment tasks. This characteristic may be related to decimal number similarities in notation with whole numbers.
Their performance is also moderate in recognition tasks that involve recognition of decimal number addition with similar digits. According to Table 4the students in Cluster 1 encounter greater difficulties in adding decimals with different number of decimal digits frequency of conversion in math meaning with similar digits irrespective of the representational transformation required. They also have difficulties in treatment tasks Trd13 and Trd14 in which decimal digits are different between the addends and the sum.
Their performance in tasks that demand understanding of the notion of equivalence in order to be solved is low even in adding decimals with similar digits e. Cod17, Cod According to the results, the students in Cluster 1 have lower performance in conversion tasks from a diagrammatic to a symbolic representation in relation with the corresponding conversion tasks from a symbolic to a diagrammatic representation Cod Cod18, CodCod20, and CodCod Representational flexibility mean scores of students in Cluster 2 for fraction addition are higher than the scores of students in Cluster 1.
The students in Cluster 2 demonstrate high performance in the symbolic treatment tasks. As in Cluster 1, the students in Cluster 2 perform much better in the same denominator fraction addition recognition tasks in relation to the recognition of different denominator fraction additions. They exhibit moderate performance in the conversion tasks from a symbolic to a diagrammatic representation. However, their performance in the conversions from a diagrammatic to symbolic representation is lower.
Two major dissociations appear in the performance of the students in Cluster 2 for fraction addition. First, although the students calculate fluently the sum of fractions with different denominators, they are not competent in recognizing whether a circle, a rectangle or a number line represented a given frequency of conversion in math meaning expression of fraction addition with different denominators. They also have great difficulties in converting fraction additions with different denominators from and towards symbolic expressions.
These results suggest that, on the one hand, Cluster 2 students are able to apply an algorithmic procedure within the symbolic representation to add fractions with different denominators. On the other hand, their poor performance in the recognition and conversion tasks of fraction addition with different denominators indicate deficiencies in the understanding of essential concepts in this type of fraction addition, that is, fraction equivalence and part-whole relations.
The second dissociation in the performance of Cluster 2 students is between the conversions from a symbolic expression to a diagram and the conversions from a diagram to a symbolic expression. In the former type of conversions they perform better in relation to the latter. This inconsistency in performance indicates that they do not sufficiently understand the common concept that both the symbolic expression and the diagrammatic representation denoted.
Although students of Cluster 2 exhibit deficiencies in the recognition and conversion tasks, they succeed in treatment tasks; therefore, they belong to a higher level than Level 1, namely, Level 2 of representational flexibility. Students of Cluster 2 for decimal numbers exhibit the same deficiencies as students of Cluster 1 for decimal numbers in treatment, recognition with the same number of decimal digits and conversion tasks. However, due frequency of conversion in math meaning their moderate performance in recognition tasks with different number of decimal digits they belong to a higher level of representational flexibility.
Students in Cluster 3 of fraction addition generally perform better than the students in Clusters 1 and 2. These students exhibit high performance in the treatment tasks. They attain moderate performance in the recognition tasks of fraction addition with the same denominators and different denominator fraction additions. Their performance in the conversion tasks is low irrespective of the initial representation, symbolic or diagrammatic.
This means that these students face difficulties in producing a symbolic or diagrammatic representation of a fraction addition given in a diagrammatic or symbolic form respectively. The frequency of conversion in math meaning characteristics suggest that students in Cluster 3 are at a higher developmental level in relation to students in Cluster 2 who perform well only in the treatment tasks.
Thus, the students in Cluster 3 belong to the third level of the representational flexibility what is the structure of a cause and effect essay. Students in Cluster 3 for decimal numbers exhibit high performance in the treatment tasks, conversion from a symbolic to a diagrammatic expression and the reverse and recognition tasks with the similar digits.
However, they are not competent in recognizing whether a circle, a rectangle or a number line model represents a given symbolic expression of decimal number addition with different number of decimal digits. Their why is framing important in photography in these tasks is similar with the performance of students who belong to Cluster 1 for decimal numbers.
Cluster 4 in fraction addition involves high achievers in most of the tasks. Due to their greater success in dealing with transformation tasks what is a meaning of impact printer relation to the students of the previous clusters, these students belong to the highest developmental level of representational flexibility that was identified in this study, Level 4.
They demonstrate high performance in recognition of fraction additions with the same denominators and different denominators and treatment tasks. Nevertheless, dissociation between the conversions from and towards symbolic expressions is found in their performance. Even though they exhibit high performance in conversion tasks from symbolic to diagrammatic representation, they perform moderately in the conversion tasks from a diagram to a symbolic expression.
Cluster a symbiotic relationship in which both organisms benefit is called in decimal numbers involves high achievers, as in the case of fractions. The sharp dissociation though in their performance between the conversions from and towards symbolic expressions was not found as in the case of Cluster 4 in fraction addition.
According to the results in Tables 5 and 6students in all clusters exhibit lower performance in recognition and conversion fraction addition tasks with the same denominators that involve number line in relation with those that involve bi-dimensional diagrams. The same occurs in recognition and conversion tasks in decimals. Table 7 presents the frequency distribution of Grade 5 to 8 school students, at the four developmental levels of representational flexibility in fraction and decimal number addition.