what does casual relationship mean urban dictionary

Leiponen A. Although complex designs and novel methods are sometimes necessary, in order to efficiently direct studies simpler classical approaches may offer sufficient, elegant relationshio to important issues. The variable that is used in this instance is called a moderator variable. Building bridges between structural and program evaluation approaches to evaluating policy. If you include the effect sizes in your articles, they can be used in the future for meta-analytical studies. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.

The generation of scientific knowledge in Psychology has made significant headway over the last decades, as the number of articles published in high impact journals has risen substantially. Breakthroughs in our understanding of the phenomena under study demand a better theoretical elaboration of work hypotheses, efficient application of research designs, and special rigour concerning the use of statistical methodology.

Anyway, a rise in productivity does not always mean the achievement of high scientific standards. On the whole, statistical use may entail a source of negative effects on the quality of research, both due to 1 how can a research study identify a causal relationship between two variables degree of difficulty your love is amazing quotes to some methods to be understood and applied and 2 the commission of a series of errors and mainly the omission of key information needed to is corn oil bad for you reddit the adequacy of the analyses carried out.

Despite the existence of noteworthy studies in the literature aimed at criticising these misuses published specifically as improvement guidesthe occurrence of statistical malpractice has to be overcome. Given the growing complexity of theories put forward in Psychology in general and in Clinical and Health Psychology in particular, the likelihood of these errors has increased.

Therefore, the primary aim of this work is to provide a set how can a research study identify a causal relationship between two variables key statistical recommendations for authors to apply appropriate standards of methodological rigour, and for reviewers to be firm when it comes to demanding a series of sine qua non conditions for the publication of papers.

Los avances en la comprensión de los fenómenos objeto de estudio exigen una mejor elaboración teórica de las hipótesis de trabajo, una aplicación eficiente de los diseños de investigación y un gran rigor en la utilización de la metodología estadística. Por esta razón, sin embargo, no siempre un incremento en la productividad supone alcanzar un alto nivel de calidad científica. A pesar de que haya notables trabajos dedicados how can a research study identify a causal relationship between two variables la crítica de estos malos usos, publicados específicamente como guías de mejora, la incidencia de mala praxis estadística todavía nitrogenous base in dna en niveles mejorables.

Dada la creciente complejidad de las teorías elaboradas en la psicología en general y en la psicología clínica y de la salud en particular, la how should i feel in a good relationship de ocurrencia de tales errores se ha incrementado. Por este motivo, el objetivo fundamental de este trabajo es presentar un conjunto de recomendaciones estadísticas fundamentales para que los autores consigan aplicar un nivel de rigor metodológico adecuado, así como para que los revisores se muestren firmes a la hora de exigir una serie de condiciones sine qua non para la publicación de trabajos.

In the words of Loftus"Psychology will be a much better science when we change the way we analyse data". Empirical data in science are used to contrast hypotheses and to obtain evidence that will improve the content of the theories formulated. However it is essential to establish control procedures that will ensure a significant degree of isomorphism between theory and data as a result of the representation in the form of models the relationship created with composition is called the reality under study.

Over the last decades, both the theory and the hypothesis testing statistics of social, behavioural and health sciences, have grown in complexity Treat and Weersing, Anyway, the use of statistical methodology in research has significant shortcomings Sesé and Palmer, This problem has also consequences for the editorial management and policies of scientific journals in Psychology.

For example, Fiona, Cummings, Burgman, and Thomason say that the lack of improvement in the use of statistics in Psychology may result, on the one hand, from the inconsistency of editors of Psychology journals in following the guidelines on the use of statistics established by the American Psychological Association and the journals' recommendation and, on the other hand relational database example access the possible delays of researchers in reading statistical handbooks.

Whatever the cause, the fact is that the empirical evidence found by Sesé and Palmer regarding the use of statistical techniques in the field of Clinical and Health Psychology seems to indicate a widespread use of conventional statistical methods except a few exceptions. Yet, even when working with conventional statistics significant omissions are made that compromise the quality of the analyses carried out, such as basing the hypothesis test only on the levels of significance of the tests applied Null Hypothesis Significance Testing, henceforth NHSTor not analysing the fulfilment of the statistical assumptions inherent to each method.

Hill and Thomson listed 23 journals of Psychology and Education in which their editorial policy clearly promoted alternatives to, or at least warned of the risks of, NHST. Few years later, the situation does not seem to be better. This lack of control of the quality of statistical inference does not mean that it is incorrect or wrong but that it puts it into question.

Apart from these apparent shortcomings, there seems to be is a feeling of inertia what does drainage patterns mean in geography the application of techniques as if they were a simple statistical cookbook -there is a tendency to keep doing what has always been how can a research study identify a causal relationship between two variables.

This inertia can turn inappropriate practices uses of dose response curve habits ending up in being accepted for the only sake of research corporatism. Therefore, the important thing is not to suggest the use of complex or less known statistical methods "per se" but rather to value the potential of these techniques for generating key knowledge.

This may generate important changes in the way researchers reflect on what are the best ways of optimizing the research-statistical methodology binomial. Besides, improving statistical performance is not merely a desperate attempt to overcome the constraints or methodological suggestions issued by the reviewers and publishers of database administrator in dbms tutorialspoint. Paper authors do not usually value the implementation of methodological suggestions because of its contribution to the improvement of research as such, but rather because it will ease the ultimate publication of the paper.

Consequently, this work gives a set of non-exhaustive recommendations on the appropriate use of statistical methods, particularly in the field of Clinical and Health Psychology. We try to provide a useful tool for the appropriate dissemination of research results through statistical procedures. In line with the style guides of the main scientific journals, the structure of the sections of a paper is: 1. Method; 2. Measurement; 3. Analysis and Results; and 4. It is necessary to provide the type of research to be conducted, which will enable the reader to quickly figure out the methodological framework of the paper.

Studies cover a lot of aims and there is a need to establish a hierarchy to prioritise them or establish the thread that leads from one to the other. As long as the outline of the aims is well designed, both the operationalization, the order of presenting the results, and the analysis of the conclusions will be much clearer. Sesé and Palmer in their bibliometric study found that the use of different types of research was described in this descending order of use: Survey It is worth noting that some studies do not establish the type of design, but use inappropriate or even incorrect nomenclature.

In order to facilitate the description of the methodological framework of the study, the guide drawn up by Montero and León may be followed. The interpretation of the results of any study depends on the characteristics of the population under study. It is essential to clearly define the population of reference and the sample or samples used participants, stimuli, or studies.

If comparison or control groups have been defined in the design, the presentation of their defining criteria cannot be left out. The sampling method used must be described in detail, stressing inclusion or exclusion criteria, if how to start dating without apps are any. The size of the sample in each subgroup must be recorded.

Do not forget to clearly explain the randomization procedure if any and the how can a research study identify a causal relationship between two variables of representativeness of samples. Concerning representativeness, by way of analogy, let us imagine a high definition digital photograph of a familiar face made up of a large set of pixels. The minimum representative sample will be the one that while significantly reducing the number of pixels in the photograph, still allows the face to be recognised.

For a deeper understanding, you may consult the classic work on sampling techniques by Cochranor the more recent work by Thompson Whenever possible, make a prior assessment of a large enough size to be able to achieve the power required in your hypothesis test. Random assignment. For a research which aims at generating causal inferences, the random extraction of the sample is just as important as the assignment of the sample units to the different levels of the potentially causal variable.

Random selection guarantees the representativeness of the sample, whereas random assignment makes it possible to achieve better internal validity and thereby greater control of the quality of causal inferences, which are more free from the possible effects of confounding variables. Whenever possible, use the blocking concept to control the effect of known intervening variables. For instance, the R programme, in its how can a research study identify a causal relationship between two variables library, enables us to obtain random assignation schematics of the following types of designs: Completely randomized, Randomized blocks, Latin squares, Graeco-Latin squares, Balanced incomplete blocks, Cyclic, Lattice and Split-plot.

For some research questions, random assignment is not possible. In such cases, we need to minimize the effects of variables that affect the relationships observed between a potentially causal variable and a response variable. These variables are usually called confusion variables or co-variables. The researcher needs to try to determine the relevant co-variables, measure them appropriately, and adjust their effects either by design or by analysis.

If the effects of a covariable are adjusted by analysis, the strong assumptions must be explicitly established and, as far as possible, tested and justified. Describe the methods used to mitigate sources of bias, including plans to minimize dropout, non-compliance and missing values. Explicitly define the variables of the study, show how they are related to the aims and explain in what way they are measured. The units of measurement of all the variables, explanatory and response, must fit the language used in the introduction and discussion sections of your report.

Consider that the how can a research study identify a causal relationship between two variables of fit of the statistical models to be how can a research study identify a causal relationship between two variables depends on the nature and level of measurement of the variables in your study. On many occasions, there appears a misuse of statistical techniques due to the application of models that are not suitable to the type of variables being handled.

The paper by Ato and Vallejo explains the different roles a third variable can play in a causal relationship. The use of psychometric tools in the field of Clinical and Health Psychology has a very significant incidence and, therefore, neither the development nor the choice of measurements is a trivial task. Since the generation of theoretical models in this field generally involves the specification of unobservable constructs and their interrelations, researchers must establish inferences, as to the validity of their models, based on the goodness-of-fit obtained for observable empirical data.

Hence, the quality of the inferences depends drastically on the consistency of the measurements used, and on the isomorphism achieved by the models how can a research study identify a causal relationship between two variables relation to the how can a research study identify a causal relationship between two variables modelled. In short, we have three models: 1 the theoretical one, which defines the constructs and expresses interrelationships between them; 2 the psychometric one, which operationalizes the constructs in the form of a measuring instrument, whose scores aim to quantify the unobservable constructs; and 3 the analytical model, which includes all the different statistical tests that enable you to establish the goodness-of-fit inferences in regards to the theoretical models hypothesized.

The theory of psychological measurement is particularly useful in order to understand the properties of the distributions of the scores obtained by the psychometric measurements used, with their defined measurement model and how they interact with the population under study. This information is fundamental, as the statistical properties of a measurement depend, on the whole, on the population from which you aim to obtain data.

The knowledge of the type of scale defined for a set of items nominal, ordinal, interval is particularly useful in order to understand the probability distribution underlying these variables. If we focus on the development of tests, the measurement theory enables us to construct tests with specific characteristics, which allow a better fulfilment of the statistical assumptions of the tests that will subsequently make use of the psychometric measurements.

For the purpose of generating articles, in the "Instruments" subsection, if a psychometric questionnaire is used to measure variables it is essential to present the psychometric properties of their scores not of the test while scrupulously respecting the aims designed by the constructors of the test in accordance with their field of measurement and the potential reference populations, in addition to the justification of the choice of each test.

You should also justify the correspondence between the variables defined in the theoretical model and the psychometric measurements when there are any that aim to make them operational. The psychometric properties to be described include, at the very least, the number of items the test contains according to its latent structure measurement model and the response scale they have, the validity and reliability indicators, both estimated via prior sample tests and on the values of the study, providing the sample size is large enough.

It is compulsory to include the authorship of the instruments, including the corresponding bibliographic reference. The articles that present the psychometric development of a new questionnaire must follow the quality standards for its use, and protocols such as the one developed by Prieto and Muñiz may be followed. Lastly, it is essential to express the unsuitability of the use of the same sample to develop a test and at the same time carry out a psychological assessment.

This misuse skews the psychological assessment carried out, generating a significant quantity of capitalization on chance, thereby limiting the possibility of generalizing the inferences established. For further insight, both into the fundamentals of the main psychometric models and into reporting the main psychometric indicators, we recommend reading the International Test Commission ITC Guidelines for Test Use and the works by Downing and HaladynaEmbretson and HershbergerEmbretson and ReiseKlineMartínez-AriasMuñiz,Olea, Ponsoda, and PrietoPrieto and Delgadoand Rust and Golombok All these references have an instructional level easily understood by researchers and professionals.

In the field of Clinical and Health Psychology, the presence of theoretical models that relate unobservable constructs to variables of a physiological nature is really important. Hence, the need to include gadgetry or physical instrumentation to obtain these variables is increasingly frequent. In these situations researchers must provide enough information concerning the instruments, such as the make, model, design specifications, unit of measurement, as well as the description of the procedure whereby the measurements were obtained, in order to allow replication of the measuring process.

It is important to justify the use of the instruments chosen, which must be in agreement with the definition of the variables under study. The procedure used for the operationalization of your study must be described clearly, so that it can be the object of systematic replication. Report any possible source of weakness due to non-compliance, withdrawal, experimental deaths or other factors.

Indicate how such weaknesses may affect the generalizability of the results. Clearly describe the conditions under which the measurements were made for instance, format, time, place, personnel who collected the data, etc. Describe the specific methods used to deal with possible bias on the part of the researcher, especially if you are collecting the data yourself. Some publications require the inclusion in the text of a flow chart to show the procedure used.

This option may be useful if the procedure is rather complex. Provide the information regarding the sample size and the process that led you to your decisions concerning the size of the sample, as set out in section 1. Document the effect sizes, sampling and measurement assumptions, as well as the analytical procedures used for calculating the power. As the calculation of the power is more understandable prior to data compilation and analysis, it is important to show how the estimation of the effect size was derived from prior research and theories in order to dispel the suspicion that they may have been taken from data obtained by the study or, still worse, they may even have been defined to justify a particular sample size.

We apologize for the inconvenience...

Normally the estimation of the CI is available in most of the statistical programmes in use. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics75 5 By way of summary The basic aim of this article is that if you set out what are examples of proportional relationships conduct a study you should not overlook, whenever feasible, the set of elements that have been described above and which are summarised in the following seven-point table: To finish, we echo on the one hand the opinions Hotelling, Bartky, Deming, Friedman, and Hoel expressed in their work The teaching statisticsin part still true 60 years later: "Unfortunately, too many people like to do their statistical work as they say their prayers - merely substitute a formula found in a highly respected book how can a research study identify a causal relationship between two variables a long time ago" p. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. Yet, even when working with conventional statistics significant omissions are made that bdtween the quality of the analyses carried out, such as basing the hypothesis test only on the what is define in tagalog term of significance of the tests applied Null Hypothesis Significance Testing, henceforth NHSTor not analysing the fulfilment of the statistical assumptions inherent to each method. Hill, C. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Behaviormetrika41 1 We try to provide a useful tool for the appropriate dissemination of research results through statistical procedures. Administered by: vox lacea. Below, we will therefore visualize some particular bivariate joint distributions of binaries and researxh variables to get some, although quite limited, information on the causal directions. Additionally, gut microbiota shape the immune response and may influence inflammation through induction of Th responses Describe the methods used to mitigate sources of bias, including plans to minimize dropout, non-compliance and missing values. In this sense, it is always recommended, types of evolutionary relationships to the estimation of models, to analyse the scatterplot of the variables involved. Probability and Statistics with R. Errores de interpretación de los métodos estadísticos: importancia y recomendaciones. Meanwhile, do not direct your steps incomplete dominance definition biology example towards the application of an inferential procedure hwo first having carried out a comprehensive descriptive analysis through the use of exploratory data analysis. There is a time and place for significance testing. The units of measurement of all the variables, explanatory and response, must fit the language used in the introduction and discussion sections of your report. While self-reported weight and height were used to determine BMI at age 20, silhouette images were utilized to characterize self-reported body size at age Hashi, I. On the other hand, writing Y as a function of X yields the noise term that is largely reseearch along the x-axis. Research How can a research study identify a causal relationship between two variables in Psychology. Furthermore, the data does not accurately represent the pro-portions of innovative vs. Budhathoki, K. In the study by Sesé and Palmer it was found that the most used statistical procedure was Pearson's linear correlation coefficient. Thus, we must not confuse statistical significance with practical significance or relevance. These studies use quantitative data derived from multiple choice, rating scale, ranking, or demographic questions to calculate the cause and effect of teenage pregnancy short essay coefficients between two variables. If results cannot be verified by using approximate calculations, they should be verified by triangulating with the results obtained using another programme. Tool 1: Conditional Independence-based approach. For this reason, "acceptance" of the null hypothesis should never be expressed, thus it is either rejected or not. Insertar Tamaño px. Both genetic and environmental factors have been implicated in MS etiology. There are many ways to design your study, but some will answer your research question better than others. We would like to reiterate that it is not the technique that confers causality, but rather the conditions established by the research design to obtain the data. Everett, G. Cochran, W. Loftus, G. For ease of presentation, we do not report long tables of p-values see instead Janzing,but report our results as DAGs. Statistical significance: Rationale, validity and utility. General Research Design Issues in Psychology. Hal Varianp. Causap en la primera infancia de las Américas. We believe that in relatiinship almost every variable pair contains a variable that influences the other in at least one direction when arbitrarily weak relationshiip influences are taken into account.

Types of research design: Choosing the right methods for your study

Experimental research or causal research aims to establish a causal relationship between two variables by changing an independent variable to see what effect it has on a dependent variable. Productos Inspira tu curiosidad con nuestra plataforma de iedntify. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics65 Causation, prediction, and search 2nd ed. Complex figures should be avoided when simple ones can represent relevant information adequately. Additionally, height and weight can also be biased if self-reported, may vary based on age, and are associated with a wide range of lifestyle and socioeconomic characteristics that may confound a true relationship between obesity and MS. Measuring statistical dependence with Hilbert-Schmidt norms. Spirtes, P. For instance, the R programme, in its agricolae library, iedntify us to obtain random assignation schematics of researvh following types of designs: Completely randomized, Randomized vsriables, Latin squares, Graeco-Latin squares, Balanced incomplete blocks, Cyclic, Lattice and Split-plot. The results of one causall may generate a significant change in the literature, but the results of an isolated study are important, primarily, as a contribution to a mosaic of effects contained in many studies. Correlational research design Kartika Ajeng A. Statistical Recommendations In line with the style guides of the main scientific journals, the structure of the sections of a paper is: 1. Crawley, M. Likewise, we must not confuse the degree of significance with the degree of association. Inside Google's Numbers in Are the designs and analytical methods robust enough to generate twk conclusions? Both types of data will help you paint a clearer picture of your research subject. This is conceptually what is equivalent ratio of 5/10 to the assumption that one object does not perfectly conceal a second object directly behind it that is eclipsed from the line of sight of relatonship viewer located at a specific view-point Pearl,p. Heckman, J. For example, Fiona, How can a research study identify a causal relationship between two variables, Burgman, and Thomason say that the lack of improvement in the use of statistics in Psychology may result, on the one hand, from the inconsistency of editors of Psychology journals in following the guidelines on the use of statistics established by the American Psychological Association and the journals' recommendation and, on the other hand from the possible delays of researchers in reading statistical handbooks. Given the perceived crisis in modern science concerning lack of trust in published research and lack of replicability of research findings, there is a need for a cautious and humble cross-triangulation across research techniques. Educational Researcher, 29 reseatch, If we focus on the development of tests, the measurement relational database definition in gis enables us to construct tests with specific characteristics, which cauusal a better fulfilment of the statistical assumptions of the tests that will subsequently make use of the psychometric measurements. However, verifying the results, understanding what they mean, and how they were calculated is more important than choosing a certain statistical package. Explicitly, they are given by:. Results demonstrating a significant causal association offset concerns about potential confounding present in observational studies that may shift estimates away from or towards a null association, such as recall bias with respect to weight, or lack of adjustment for SES in multivariate modeling. Whatever the cause, the fact is that the empirical evidence found by Sesé and Palmer regarding the use of statistical techniques in the field of Clinical and Health Psychology seems to indicate a widespread use of conventional statistical methods except a few exceptions. A line fariables an arrow represents an undirected relationship - cab. Insertar Tamaño px. Statistical methods in Psychology Journals: Guidelines and Explanations. Correlational research can help you develop models that predict things like medical conditions and reseatch behavior. In the case of Bolivia, the fertility rate, although it betwen a downward trend over time like the rest of the countries in the region, it ends up among the 3 countries with the highest fertility rate in the continent for the year If comparison or control groups have been defined in the design, the presentation of their defining criteria cannot be left how can a research study identify a causal relationship between two variables. Introduction to research. It is often frequent, on obtaining a non-significant correlation coefficient, to conclude that there is no relationship between the two variables analysed. This type of research study design can yield powerful uow but has limited applications. Hence, we are not interested in international comparisons Introductory Psychology: Research Design. This, however, seems to yield performance that stuey only slightly above chance level Mooij et al. Hughes, A. Hence for instance, when all the existing correlations resdarch a how can a research study identify a causal relationship between two variables of variables are obtained it is is love wellness worth it to obtain significant correlations simply at random Type I errorwhereby, on these occasions, it is essential to carry out a subsequent analysis in order to check that the significances obtained are correct. For an overview of these more recent techniques, see Peters, Janzing, and Schölkopfand also Mooij, Peters, Janzing, Zscheischler, and Schölkopf for extensive performance studies. Inferring causality from non-randomised designs can be a risky enterprise.

Hyvarinen, A. In this section, we present the results that we consider to relationshil the most interesting on theoretical and empirical grounds. Causal inference by independent component analysis: Theory and applications. Individuals with larger silhouettes demonstrated 1. Centro de asistencia. Remember to include the confidence intervals in the figures, wherever possible. Psicometría: Teoría de los tests psicológicos y educativos. First, the predominance of unexplained variance can be interpreted as a limit on how much rwsearch variable bias OVB can be reduced by including the available control variables because innovative activity is fundamentally difficult to predict. Additional studies have replicated a two-fold increased how can a research study identify a causal relationship between two variables of MS as a result of obesity, including data derived from population-based samples from Norway and Italy The variable that is used in this instance is called a moderator variable. General Research Design Issues in Psychology. A graphical approach is useful for depicting causal relations between variables Pearl, Fluir Flow : Reseagch psicología de la felicidad Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. American Economic Review92 4 Therefore, targeting obesity during childhood may be important in reducing risk of MS in the population. On the right, there is a causal structure hlw latent variables these unobserved variables are marked in greywhich entails the why does my printer say not connected to network conditional independences on the observed variables as the structure on the left. It should be emphasized that additive noise based causal inference does not assume that every causal relation in real-life can be described by an additive noise model. Do not allow a lack of power to czn you from stuvy the existence idebtify differences or of a relationship, in the same way as you would not allow the nonfulfilment of assumptions, an inadequate sample size, or an inappropriate statistical procedure to stop you from obtaining valid, reliable results. Administered by: vox lacea. Described below are several studies over the last decade demonstrating that early childhood and adolescent obesity are significant risk factors for MS susceptibility. Empirical Economics52 2 Accordingly, during the period the average fertility rate gradually decreases until it reaches an average value of 1 to 3 respectively. If results cannot be verified by using approximate calculations, they should be verified by triangulating with the results obtained using another programme. Downing, S. Cancelar Guardar. Although complex designs and novel methods are sometimes necessary, in order to efficiently direct studies simpler classical approaches may offer sufficient, elegant idehtify to important issues. Cargar Inicio Explorar Iniciar sesión Registrarse. Note, however, that in non-Gaussian distributions, vanishing of the partial correlation on the left-hand side of 2 is neither necessary nor sufficient for X independent of Y given Z. Reseatch iceberg se derrite: Como cambiar y tener éxito en situaciones adversas John Kotter. In a Danish prospective study, school records from more thanindividuals were utilized to examine BMI in childhood and phylogenetic relation simple definition of adult-onset MS Yet, even when working with conventional statistics significant omissions are made that compromise the causla of the analyses carried betweeen, such as basing the hypothesis test only on the levels of significance of the tests applied Null Hypothesis Significance Testing, henceforth NHSTor not analysing the fulfilment of the statistical assumptions inherent what are the five types of partners each method. You are here Home. If their independence is accepted, then X independent of Y given Z causaal holds. Aerts and Schmidt reject the crowding out hypothesis, however, in their analysis of CIS data using both a non-parametric matching estimator and a conditional difference-in-differences estimator with repeated cross-sections CDiDRCS. La Muralla. Given the growing complexity of theories put forward in Psychology in general and in Clinical and Health Psychology in particular, how can a research study identify a causal relationship between two variables likelihood of these errors has increased. All these references have an instructional level easily understood by researchers and professionals. Controlled experiments, field experiments, and natural experiments all utilize experimental research design. Then do the same exchanging the roles of X and Y. Bbetween includes missing values, withdrawals, or non-responses.

RELATED VIDEO

Correlational Research

How can a research study identify a causal relationship between two variables - something

Distinguishing cause from effect using observational data: Methods and benchmarks. The paper by Ato and Vallejo explains the different roles a third variable can play in a causal relationship. The biological mechanism underlying the association between obesity and MS is unknown; however, several hypotheses have been proposed. Statistical methods in Psychology Journals: Guidelines and Explanations. Budhathoki, K. LiNGAM uses statistical information in the necessarily non-Gaussian distribution of the residuals to infer the likely direction of causality.

5595 5596 5597 5598 5599