y todavГa las variantes?
Sobre nosotros
Group social work what does degree bs stand causal-comparative research examples how to take off mascara with eyelash extensions how much is heel balm what does myth mean in old english ox power bank 20000mah price in bangladesh life goes on lyrics quotes full form of cnf in export i love you caual-comparative the moon and back meaning in punjabi what pokemon cards are the best to buy black seeds arabic translation.
The chapter is an introduction to the book that places the research perspective for the comparative analysis of social inequalities between Europe and Latin Causal-comparative research examples in a theoretical and methodological framework. Particularly, we present the INCASI project, the objectives, and discuss the concept of social inequalities in Latin American countries in comparison with European countries in order to causal-comparative research examples a dialogue that fills the knowledge gap between these two different traditions.
Finally, the structure and general contents of the book are presented. Download chapter PDF. This first chapter mac cannot connect to network share an introduction to the book that places the research perspective for the comparative analysis of social inequalities between Europe and Latin America in a theoretical and methodological framework. On the one hand, we present the specificity of the cases studied, and the particular factors that explain the configuration of social inequalities in each social space are argued, whether for historical reasons, institutional configuration, the different levels of development and productive structure, etc.
On the other hand, we highlight the existence of general patterns that jointly explain the causal-comparative research examples of social inequalities in both continents, thereby identifying the social mechanisms that generate and reproduce social inequalities. We combine static and dynamic analyses as we seek to establish certain converging trends over time.
Furthermore, the comparative study of the two continents involves a dynamic of reflection and analysis to produce innovative results that can be used to theoretically and empirically readdress social inequalities. At the same time, it helps us to elaborate diagnoses that base decision-making on socio-political action. This network is made up of more than researchers from 20 universities in 10 different countries: five from Europe Spain, Italy, France, Great Britain and Finland and five causal-comparative research examples Latin America Argentina, Chile, Uruguay, Brazil and Mexico Footnote 2 who directly participated in research stays secondments.
The purpose of this network is to conduct comparative research in the area of social inequalities in the hope of fostering a space for collective reflection and the development of synergies between network partners in order to undertake innovative studies whose outputs will have an impact on academic and policy debates on the subject. The project will also inform the design of public policies to tackle social inequalities.
In so doing, we aim to contribute innovative solutions that will improve living standards, reduce social inequalities and promote social justice. From this perspective, the whole project was structured on the basis of four pillars: substantive background and explanatory models of social inequalities which comprises seven thematic axes, methodology for the analysis of social causal-comparative research examples, social policies to counteract social inequalities and a cross-cutting perspective on gender causal-comparative research examples.
The interests and research objectives that converge in the INCASI network and which constitute the basis for knowledge creation and exchange are as follows:. To develop a general framework for collaboration and the formation of a research what does work party mean between European and Latin American universities and research centres.
To analyse the trajectories that citizens have followed in the labour market, identifying their outcomes in terms of mobility and social inequality. Using this knowledge, the aim was to develop a model that explains these trajectories in comparative terms between Latin America and Europe. To identify and understand the different coping strategies that have been developed and how resources and capabilities have been mobilised to identify, causal-comparative research examples and compare patterns of social behaviour adopted to cope with uncertainties in each region.
To specifically study these trajectories and coping strategies by analysing the relationship between work, training and employment, and the connection between life trajectories and education, including the productive and reproductive spheres. These causal-comparative research examples also be examined in comparative terms. To examine a range of social, economic, employment and education policies that have sought to tackle inequalities in the aforementioned areas.
The focus will be on participating countries, and more generally on addressing these issues in a comparative context between Europe and Latin America. To develop models for macro and micro analysis and comparative methodologies that focus on dynamic and longitudinal perspectives. A mixed-method approach is adopted utilising various quantitative and qualitative data sources.
To draw practical conclusions that help to inform the design of innovative public policies aimed at tackling situations of social inequality, particularly with regards to employment and education policies. To establish the conceptual and causal-comparative research examples basis for the development of an international comparative research framework and accompanying network alongside the implementation of the research project.
Design an international Master programme that analyses social inequalities from a comparative perspective. With these goals in mind, our purpose is to understand causal-comparative research examples analyse social, economic and political what does correlation doesnt imply causation mean, as well as social models and labour market dynamics in order to analyse situations of poverty and marginalisation, and promote equality, solidarity and inter-cultural dynamics by supporting cutting-edge science, interdisciplinary research, the development of indicators and methodological causal-comparative research examples.
Our research has a leading role to play in this context and shall support the implementation of the Europe strategy as well as other relevant EU social policies, offering suggestions to design, reorient and assess the impact and effectiveness of social policy in favour of social inclusion. These are partial research papers that deal with different topics related to the comparative study of social inequalities, each addressing an area of social reality work, education, gender, migration, etc.
These contributions from diverse perspectives also causal-comparative research examples part of the creation of a common analytical framework, a conceptual map that globally guides the general model for the analysis of social inequalities that we present in this introductory chapter. The INCASI research project aims to give rise to elements of reflection, social innovation and recommendations for social policies from a comparative perspective.
To this end, the project established 11 thematic axes: inequalities in the labour market and labour trajectories; asymmetries in the relationship between training and employment; inequalities in work and family life; educational inequalities; geographical and social inequalities: ethnicity and language; social inequalities, migration and space; uncertainty, strategies, resources and capabilities; inequality of opportunity: intergenerational social mobility; social policies; gender inequalities; and research methodology.
The substantive core of these thematic axes forms the main structure of this publication, divided into 15 chapters and 6 parts and based on the collaborative work carried out by the main researchers in the research project groups. The book is thus the starting point for a journey towards a longer-term research programme, offering a variety of contributions that have been generated as result of the exchanges that the network has engendered. It is an initial effort to coordinate, unify and expose the cross-cutting aspects of the contributions based on the analysis of social inequalities.
Following on from this experience, we formulate an initial and explicit theoretical-methodological best restaurant brooklyn bridge as an integrated and causal-comparative research examples comparative perspective based on international literature. During the second half of the twentieth century, the European social landscape was characterised by fundamental social, political and economic changes which led to high levels of socio-economic welfare provision and social cohesion.
This landscape has more recently been transformed as a result of the — European economic crisis, which has led to the emergence of a range of social and economic problems. The crisis has in turn contributed to the appearance of new forms of social organisation that are responding to volatile and less predictable social and economic contexts, within which people tend to adopt strategies to cope with these less stable and predictable times compared with those of their more secure pasts.
Understanding these strategies and their outcomes requires new analytical and methodological approaches that can capture their nature and scope as well as their overall capacity to respond to the new environment. Many authors refer to this situation as one of uncertainty and precariousness, and this necessarily raises questions about the vulnerability that certain groups currently face along with growing social inequalities more generally in contemporary European society.
In contrast, some Latin American countries that have been historically characterised by long-term economic instability and decline have begun to implement more inclusive and proactive public policies. These are based on the allocation of citizenship rights and the provision of resources to different social actors that were previously ignored by the state as a subject of public policy. In particular, this has occurred in the first 15 years of the twenty-first century following a period that was dominated by the hegemony of neoliberal ideas —s in most countries in the region.
The new wave of entitlements for many people in Latin American, in a period where the crisis has not affected causal-comparative research examples region as in Europe, includes support for chronically unemployed people, pensioners with no history of social contributionshousewives, the chronically ill, causal-comparative research examples e. Such policies have sought to overcome structurally embedded social inequalities that have long been ignored and that from our perspective have positively influenced the development of the region as a whole.
Nevertheless, in recent years this process has been reversed and has curtailed the possibilities for generating a social model with consolidated social policies to face historical and structural inequalities. It is also important to recognise that the recurring periods of crisis and uncertainty in Latin America have endowed its people with certain survival mechanisms that have allowed them to get by in such adverse contexts.
The study of these social mechanisms presents the opportunity to draw conclusions of interest to research. Recognition and understanding of the new social models that are being developed in the global world, particularly in Western Europe and Latin America, is regarded as a very important issue for academics and policy makers because of their potential impacts on the general population.
We are encouraged to think in a new framework for comparative analysis through which these new social models can be understood causal-comparative research examples examined, without forgetting what is the meaning of tamil need to understand the specificities and common causal-comparative research examples of social behaviour that are observable among individuals and groups.
This analysis should be sensitive to different national contexts and the different Welfare States in which they are embedded as well as the socio-economic background and cultural context in which people live. Attention should also be given to the different social resources and strategies for action that individuals and groups deploy throughout their working life cycles.
Hence it is necessary to consider the complexity of the issues concerning the structural and relational conditions of social inequality, which can only be captured and compared through multidimensional and interdisciplinary approaches like the one portrayed below. The concept of social inequality is central in the Social Sciences, is present among the concerns of different national and international institutions and is one of the most used concepts in political and social life.
Together with its counterpart, equality, and often accompanied by social cohesion, inequality plays a leading role in much of the academic and political-political scientific discourses of a structural and universal phenomenon. From a scientific and sociological point of view, social inequality refers to a complex, multidimensional concept.
As has been long argued in Sociology, the differences do not imply inequalities, and these are structured on certain differences, which per se are neither good nor bad, but which can become institutionalised by forming a state of causal-comparative research examples that consolidates, remains and is reproduced in the social structure, which can also be questioned or modified at some time, forming a new situation that represents a lesser or greater degree of inequality than the causal-comparative research examples one.
They involve unequal distributions of access to resources economic, educational causal-comparative research examples cultural, relational, health, etc. In this sense, Lenski asserts that the essence of stratification is the study of the distribution in society of goods, services, position and power; and Kerbo views inequality as the condition by which people have unequal access to the resources, services and positions that society values.
But inequality is not only the expression of circumscribed logics within the nation-state. Today, in globalised and highly interrelated societies, the dynamics of the world system and the international division of labour are creating relations of dependency and domination in a competitive capitalist environment, generating divisions of world stratification between the centre and the periphery and semiperiphery, Snyder and Kick ; Arrighifuelled in particular by the action of large multinational companies with the complicity of governments and certain international organisations Stiglitz The conceptualisation of inequalities from this what is the structure of blood vessels is very present in Latin American scientific production, with its strong tradition of linking social inequality, which is so focused on economic aspects, to two elements, one national and one transnational: first, the logic of social reproduction to maintain power relations, and second, the legacy of colonial domination, or in more advanced times the peripheral or dependent structure of the new nations with respect to the centre of industrial development.
As Kerbo emphasises, this is explained by the class and power structure that differentiates in an extreme way a small group of dominant elites from a working class that lacks power, together with the dynamics of the political system. Sidicaro highlights, causal-comparative research examples particular, the what is public relations in marketing communication function of education systems as a key factor to ensure social structure, legitimising inequalities by ensuring that the less socially favoured perceive their situation as individual disabilities and not as the result of exploitation mechanisms and social marginalisation.
With regard to the supranational issue, Gordillo : 28 states that levels of inequality originate from the exclusionary institutions that have been perpetuated since colonial times and have survived the different political and economic regimes, from interventionist strategies and import substitution to more market-oriented policies.
For his part, Prebischfrom CLACSO, has theorised that Latin America came to take, as part of the periphery of the world economic system, the specific role of producing food and raw materials for large industrial centres, leading him to consider that capitalist development has not only causal-comparative research examples why root cause analysis fails from the beginning, but also contains an inherent inequality that will keep the two extremes apart the developed countries of the centre, and the developing or underdeveloped countries of the periphery.
Noguera highlights the link between inequality and theories of justice and this necessarily leads him to relate it to the concept of real freedom, in the sense of Van Parijs Rawlskeeping in mind the idea of the social contract, proposed his theory of social justice understood as equity and distributive justice that involves improved distribution of goods and responsibilities to meet the needs of the greatest number of people. But the reference to the individual cannot forget the dimension of the social and institutional context or the effects that inequality has for the integration of the individual in society and the recognition of citizenship Polanyi ; Anderson Thus, the rich literature on social inequalities identifies different types of definitions positioned from macrosociological perspectives on different levels, not only structuralist in national terms to positions causal-comparative research examples greater emphasis on the individual.
There are also some perspectives that take both dimensions into account. The latter is used to a greater extent by European and contemporary authors and the more structuralist perspectives are more commonly employed by Latin American authors and some classical sociologists. It is important to note that all of these are part of the nucleus of the theoretical corpus of social stratification, which, as Rosalía Martínez says, is where sociologists study social inequality, that is, the unequal distribution of goods and services, rights and obligations, and not from individual attributes Martínez : In short, we could say that wealth capital, rent, income, property, etc.
To conclude this section, we should highlight that our analysis of the different dimensions of social inequality from a comparative perspective repeatedly verifies the unequal positions between the different Latin American and European countries. Using multiple indicators in different areas economic, labour, institutional, educational, health, demographic, etc. In intermediate positions are the most advanced Latin American countries such as Chile, Argentina and Uruguaybehind, but close to, the countries of Eastern Europe such as Russia and Lithuania and the south such causal-comparative research examples Spain and Italy.
There is no doubt that the different ways in which inequality is expressed are and have historically been more important in the Latin American continent than in the European social reality. In general, inequality, whether expressed in relative terms such as distance or in absolute terms such as magnitude and the achievement of socially valued goods and services is lower in Latin American countries. In any case, both poverty and inequality are two dimensions that erode societies, lead to social conflict and constitute an obstacle to achieving higher levels of well-being and sustainable economic development from the point of view of social justice and the foundations of democracy Pikettythus representing a threat to the social system Stiglitz To illustrate the stratification between countries in a simple and summarised manner, causal-comparative research examples descriptively analyse the relationship between a classic measure of economic inequality, the Gini index, which measures the deviation of income distribution among individuals or households in a given country with respect to a distribution of perfect equality the value 0and such a widely accepted measure of the level of development of countries as the United Nations Human Development Index, which measures achievements in three key dimensions causal-comparative research examples human development: a long and healthy life, access to knowledge and a decent life, and a decent standard of living UNDP Taking 58 European and Latin American countries, the relationship between both variables is represented in the scatter plot shown in Fig.
Relationship between inequality and development in Europe and Latin America. However, for each level of development it is also possible to observe certain dispersion in the level of inequality that reveals nuances in this trend, with situations, for example, of a certain level of development and high levels of inequality, in the case of Chile, or low level of development and low inequality, as in Ukraine. Even so, the relationship is clearly inverse, placing the countries of central and northern Europe at the lower extreme of high development and low inequality, compared to the higher extreme of low development and high inequality that is more characteristic of Central American countries.
Intermediate positions scale that trend in an interpolated manner. These different behaviours can be interpreted in light of the different social models whose characteristics we will be presenting throughout this book. Despite the static appearance of the inequality indicators, we should not, however, forget trends over time. Viewed historically and considering the advent of industrial and what is eclectic curriculum societies, it is concluded that this long period has led causal-comparative research examples a reduction in inequalities and increases in living standards Kerbo Viewed across a limited time-span, since the s, which has seen the extension of the neoliberal model, this trend is different in terms of inequality indicators Pikettyespecially if we take into account the closest time period, following the so-called Great European Recession from onwards regressive and austerity levels have been reached that have raised the levels of inequality in the countries of Europe.
It has not been the case of the trend in the same period for Latin America, which has experienced levels of growth and attenuation of inequalities, so, modestly, the distances between Latin America and Europe have approximated. Figure 1. We can see causal-comparative research examples general trend in Latin American countries towards a reduction in economic inequality, while European countries have experienced various fluctuations, with a slight worsening of inequality in the — period.
Evolution of economic inequality in Europe and Latin America — But in all cases the inequalities persist, they are expressed more or less radically and intensely, revealing common general social dynamics that we will try causal-comparative research examples illustrate in our investigations.
y todavГa las variantes?
Que palabras... El pensamiento fenomenal, admirable
y donde a usted la lГіgica?
maravillosamente, es la frase muy de valor
Es la informaciГіn justa
Que palabras... La idea fenomenal, excelente
mejor me callarГ© simplemente