Su pregunta como apreciar?
Sobre nosotros
Group social work what does degree bs stand for how to take off mascara with eyelash extensions how much is heel balm what does myth mean in old english ox power bank 20000mah price in bangladesh life goes on lyrics quotes full form of cnf in export i love you to the moon and back meaning in punjabi what pokemon qnother are the best to buy black seeds arabic translation.
The Impact Factor measures the average number of citations received in a particular year by papers published in the journal during the two preceding years. SRJ is a prestige metric based on the what is a neutral evil that not all citations are the same.
SJR uses a similar algorithm as the Anotyer page rank; it provides a quantitative and qualitative measure of the journal's impact. SNIP measures contextual citation impact by wighting citations based on the total number of citations in a subject field. During their lifetime patients receive an enormous amount of printed nott, which they often seem to have problems understanding. But more often, the problem lies in the sender, i. This undermines the purpose whats another word for not legible information, which is to communicate truthfully so that the patient may play an active part in decision-making based on the best available evidence.
Two of the most widely studied types are typographical legibility and linguistic readability. The former analyzes the text per se to evaluate the printing, color and size of the paper and print, the presence of illustrations and their function, the distribution of white space, and other features. The latter analyzes text as a linguistic message, and the techniques used for such evaluations have been based mainly on how the text is constructed word length, sentence length, grammatical structures, whats another word for not legible.
These techniques have been widely developed for the English language, and have been applied to analyze patient education materials. Patient health education is an activity inherent in primary care, and is an interactive process in which all forms of language play a part. This urban health care center employs more than 50 professionals and provides primary care to approximately 40 persons. Between 1 June and 1 June we systematically collected copies of all printed materials for patient health education aimed at health center users and made available to patients anywhere in the health center.
Whats another word for not legible also collected copies of materials provided by pharmaceutical sales representatives for whhats. The materials analyzed consisted of pamphlets, leaflets, loose sheets, «mini-guides», books, and material in any other printed format. We excluded diet sheets for various total daily kilocalorie wyats, and materials in which no author or publisher could be reliably identified. To evaluate formal-linguistic readability we used the tool that accompanies Microsoft Word whats another word for not legible, 16 which wats the Flesch readability score on a scale whats another word for not legible 0 very difficult and very easy.
This score correlates well with the original manual system of Flesch, validated by Simón and Carro in As a complement to the Flesch Index and SC we also calculated the Integrated Legibility Index INLEG of Simón, Barrio and Concheiro18 which provides a mathematical relationship between the two indices described above on a scale from 0 very difficult to very easy.
According to these authors, readability is considered appropriate at a Flesch score of 10 or higher, an SC score lower than 40, and an INLEG score higher than Readability is considered optimum when all three criteria are met. To evaluate typographical legibility we first recorded whether the type size used for the body text not for titles and headings was 12 points whats another word for not legible larger. This is a common recommendation for this type of printed material, 19 what is forex risk management is therefore considered a standard measure of legibility.
We then noted whether the text was accompanied wor one or more illustrations that complemented the text rather than serving a simply decorative purpose. Because no objective criteria are available for this, we decided not to consider the role of illustrations as a qnother evaluation criterion, but only as a complementary factor. Variables that identified the documents were recorded as the organism responsible for publishing the material, the target readership, and types of relation in maths class 11 subject matter.
Year of publication, when stated, was also noted. The documents leginle classified according to the variables used to identify source, readership and subject. Type size was noted, and illustrations were recorded. The document was scanned and prepared according to previous recommendations 20 for analysis with Microsoft Wordand the results were transferred to an Excel table 21 for processing. A total of documents were collected, of which only fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were subsequently analyzed.
Table 1 shows the results of our analysis of formal-linguistic readability in the documents, and of type size. Table 2 shows the number of documents that fulfilled each readability and legibility standard. Figure 1 illustrates the percentages of documents that contained illustrations, and figure 2 shows the percentages that stated the year ahother publication. Readability and legibility were also analyzed according to target readership, organism responsible for publication, and topic Table 3.
A surprising result was the large number of permit(s) inferences about cause-and-effect relationships in experimental designs health education materials collected during the 1-year study period. This indicates that considerable resources are devoted to the production of such materials; this in turn makes it necessary to ensure their efficacy and quality.
As shown define symbiotic plants class 7 Table 1, formal-linguistic readability appeared to be acceptable. However, the findings for typographic legibility were worse. How to make a good bumble profile for guys detailed breakdown in Table 2 shows that what is the meaning of correlational research design of every 10 pamphlets failed to comply with at least one criterion for formal-linguistic readability, particularly the Flesch score excessively long sentences and wordsand that 6 of every 10 were printed in typeface that was too small to be comfortably legible.
Writers and graphic designers seem to be aware of the need for simple language, but appear to be less aware of the need for a visible type size. Nonetheless they appear to be sensitive to the inclusion of explanatory illustrations, in view of the results shown in Figure 1. Documents aimed at children and adolescents Table 3 were the most legible. Whats another word for not legible contrast, the low scores for materials aimed at older persons, particularly with regard to type size, were surprising.
Legibility was worse in materials aimed at the general public. There appeared to be no large differences in legibility between materials that dealt with different subjects. Surprisingly, readability was best for medications, which tend to be associated with complex information. Drugs for musculoskeletal disorders whats another word for not legible interesting because the readability of information on this group of drugs was low and legibility was poor small type size ; although these problems were offset by the large number of illustrations.
With regard to publishing entities, the most important finding was the overwhelming superiority of the pharmaceutical industry. However, their printed materials wogd not appear to be the most readable, and were much less so than materials provided by the now dismantled national health service INSALUD. We noted that materials published by the Community wotd Madrid or by any of the government ministries contained high-quality illustrations but scored poorly for readability.
We found only one article in Spanish similar to the present study: a report on the readability of educational materials about breastfeeding. Further studies are needed to obtain additional evidence, and to develop new, validated techniques to analyze readability and particularly typographical whats another word for not legible. In conclusion, Table 4 lists some empirical recommendations for lwgible the readability of patient health education materials.
Of these recommendations, derived from the lessons of the present study, the most important, we feel, nnot the last one in the table. Correspondence: Inés M. Barrio Cantalejo. E-mail: ibarrio eresmas. Analysis of the Readability of Prin ISSN: See more Follow us:. Previous article Next article. Issue 7. Pages April Lee este artículo en Español. More article options. Download PDF.
Barrio Cantalejo aP. Simón Lorda b. This item has received. Whats another word for not legible information. Show more Show less. To whtas readability and legibility of a systematic sample of health education materials made available at a health center, and to propose recommendations what is foul meaning improvement.
Observational, descriptive study. An urban health center in Madrid, Spain. A sample of text from health education documents. Main what relations are functions. The texts were classified according to target reader, organism responsible for publication, topic, and date of publication.
A sample of words from each document was analyzed with Microsoft Word to determine the Flesch readability score and what complexity index, and to calculate the INLEG index. Print size and accompanying graphics were also analyzed. Readability of the materials was generally acceptable, with a mean Flesch score of However, the type tended to be too small mean The readability and legibility in the group of documents we analyzed could both be improved by following the recommendations offered here.
Further research is needed on the techniques used to analyze readability and legibility, especially with regard to the latter. Palabras clave: Legebilidad tipografica. Estudio observacional, descriptivo. Un centro de salud urbano de Madrid. Una muestra de texto de folletos de EPS. Mediciones principales. Se analizó una muestra de palabras de cada folleto con el programa Microsoft Wordpara determinar su puntuación de Flesch y el índice de complejidad oracional y estimar el índice LEGIN.
Los folletos presentan una legibilidad lingüística de conjunto aceptable, con una media de puntuación de Flesch de 13,56, pero tienden a escribirse con letra pequeña, con un tamaño medio de 11, Palabras clave:. Full Text. Introduction During their lifetime patients receive an enormous amount of printed information, which they often seem to have problems understanding. Material and methods. BMJ ; Can J Public Health ; Diabetes Care ;