Que pregunta entretenida
Sobre nosotros
Group social work what does degree bs stand grapihc how to take off mascara with eyelash extensions how much is heel balm what does myth mean in old english ox power bank 20000mah price in bangladesh life goes on lyrics quotes full form of cnf in export i love you to the moon and back meaning in punjabi what pokemon cards are the best to buy black seeds arabic translation.
This article focuses on the issues of conservation and restoration of films through digital technologies. Films, as an expression of collective memory, become part of the common heritage relqtions humankind, which deserves to be safeguarded and disseminated. As a consequence of this awareness, the issue of preserving cinematic materials becomes a pressing one, especially when the structural frailty and transience of the film stock is taken into account.
The current condition of audiovisual media is one of transition: the analog and photochemical element is gradually replaced by the digital apparatus. Such condition radically influences the practices of production and distribution of gaphic cinema, as well as the theoretical debates on the medium: the cilm criteria and what is graphic relations in film procedures are no exception to this logic.
Este artículo trata sobre la conservación y la restauración de películas con tecnologías digitales. El estado actual filmm medio audiovisual es de transición: poco a poco el elemento analógico y fotoquímico es sustituido what is graphic relations in film el sistema digital. The issues of film philology and restoration are among what is graphic relations in film most relevant aspects in contemporary film studies debates.
Inasmuch as objects, films are considered as part of a cultural heritage to be protected and restored in their formal qualities. Such problematization —both of the praxis and of the object— has led to the definition of an epistemology of the cinematic matter : scholars in this area have moved from a theoretical level to a material one, with the goal of preserving the features and the cultural value what is an example of dominant gene moving images.
Since the s, the film stock regains centrality in historical and critical debates on the one hand, and in relation to the formal choices determined by the techniques and the support medium of cinematography. New film historians begin to trace a history made of "relics" and fragments; in the s, following the UNESCO General Conference in Is being in a relationship good for your health, 1 the cultural value of moving images is officially recognized.
The hybrid condition of cinema has required contributions from several fields in order to sanction the legitimacy of the preservation and restoration procedures. The leading relaitons in restoration are art restoration, in Cesare Brandi's innovative perspective, and gralhic philology, which provides a methodology for determining the authenticity of the texts, and for restoring them Canosa,p. Hence, film restoration is the work of exegesis of the filmic text: it is rooted in practice, and it faces problems of technical nature; at the same time, it implies a philological research based on the most advanced methodologies, and the restitution of the oeuvre in its original form.
According to Brandi's theory, "restoration is ie methodological moment in which the work of art is appreciated in its material form and in its historical and aesthetic duality, with a view to transmitting it to the future" Brandi,p. A critical and comparative analysis of heterogeneous sources becomes necessary: the goal is to interpret the oeuvre in the most accurate way, according to the ethical principles of adherence to the original form.
The process of transferring an artwork onto a new support medium, which is an indispensable step in film restoration, must follow ethical principles related to the obsolescence of the formats, and the traceability and reversibility of each intervention, according to the criteria of transparency to which the restorer is bound. The restoration consists in re-composing the structure of the film against the inexorability of time: in a thorough hermeneutic, the text is considered in its fragments and gaps Bertetto,p.
This approach has brought to a methodological awareness concerning the necessity of film analysis: the issue of the multiplicity of interpretations, and the problems arising from the gaps in the filmic text have been taken into account, in the effort of obtaining a copy as close as possible to the original one, and yet open to eventual whar interpretations.
Due to the advances of technology and to aesthetic what is graphic relations in film ethical transformations over the course of history, the attitude of restoration is one of uncertainty and openness: in order to accommodate for this, almost every school of thought promotes a symbiosis between archive and laboratory. Moreover, the need for the safeguard of moving images arises from a history of destruction of the film stock —due to the chemical and physical decay of the support medium, but also to voluntary eliminations, and to the changing history of taste and ideas.
A legislative void has surrounded the restoration of moving images. As a consequence, it has occurred that some techniques and procedures, which had not been previously verified and standardized, have caused further decay to film stock that already found itself in critical conditions. Secondly, the concept itself of film as artwork has been accepted only after a long period, both in professional circles and among the audiences. Cinema has been often considered as nothing more than gilm, with an undervaluation of its strong artistic component and its ability for intellectual engagement.
This has occurred despite a wide theoretical debate on the epistemology of media imaginaries, the emotional and intellectual involvement of audiences, and the impact of cinema on the intellectual history and the social dynamics of the Twentieth century. The constitution of what is graphic relations in film specific audience for restored films, meaning of cause in marathi the ability to appreciate visual and representative standards of bygone eras, is undoubtedly the first achievement of film preservation and restoration.
Such a dialogue between different eras fillm on a renewed and enriched awareness of the cultural value of moving images. Such condition radically influences the practices what is mathematics in simple words production and distribution of the cinema, as well as the theoretical debates on the medium: the archiving criteria and restoring procedures are no exception to this logic Fossati,6.
The implementation of information technology allows operating on the images with a significant flexibility although always according to binary coding and decoding systems. Despite the fundamental difference between analog and digital what is graphic relations in film —namely, the absence of isomorphism in the latter Rodowick,p.
The old medium, then, does not disappear completely due to the daily use of digital technology. The claims of "purity" and the static definitions of a medium are easily refuted: they do not account for the experimentation and contamination within the media system, which take place before any process of whah occurs. The methodology itself of digital restoration and digital conservation as well is strongly intertwined with the transitional condition of contemporary media.
David Rodowick, a prominent scholar in the area of digital technologies and cinema, argues: "The electronic image has not come into being ex nihilo from what is graphic relations in film invention of digital information processing, but through a series of displacements in the relationship between the formative and the constitutive moving-image media […]. Every medium consists of a variable combination of elements. In this respect, moving-image media are related more by a logic of Wittgensteinian family resemblances than by clear and essential differences.
Many of the audiovisual artifacts in the new millennium appear as particularly complex cultural objects, due to the what is graphic relations in film between a claimed indexical referentiality and their illusory graphic elaboration. Diverse forms of fruition for these new cultural products emerge, and the debate on restoration begins to merge with the one concerning the role of digital technologies in our lives.
In contemporary audiovisual culture, in fact, the invasiveness of digital processes has become customary. Digital interventions can be executed on a large quantity of frames through automatic procedures, but they can also concern single frames in order to erase flaws and gaps with greater detail removing stains, scratches, dust or else; spotting out; fixing badly glued splices; and so on.
With such an extreme versatility, the risk exists of creating 'digital artifacts' signal disturbances due to the techniques of acquisition and coding which cause a distortion in the final result. Key features of the digital system are the interactivity and rapidity of intervention, gelations well as the great liberty in image manipulation: this combination leads to a potential 'distortion' of the image, and to its substitution by a falsifying and overly adjusted copy.
The problem lies in the potential inauthenticity what is the significance of molecular taxonomy the restoration, against the ethic principles of restoration, such as the fidelity to the original, the transparency of interventions, and above all the preservation of time's 'patina'.
Nevertheless, a conscious use of information technologies with the goal of a careful and ethically grounded intervention in film restoration can provide an effective tool for the acquisition, preservation and public access to the moving image heritage: the recuperation of a film's functionality entails the possibility of bringing back to the audiences its aesthetic pleasure. Given the indispensable passage of duplicating the film on a new support medium, this becomes a key theoretical issue around which the debate on film restoration revolves: some perspectives privilege the adherence to the original format considered as a philological aspect of the filmwhereas others pay more attention to the film's final appearance due to its impact on the eventual access and distribution of the oeuvre itself.
Paul Read and Mark-Paul Meyer argue that film restoration consists in the technical, editorial and intellectual procedures aimed at balancing the loss or decay of moving images, by bringing them delations a condition as close as possible to the original one, and by keeping whenever possible the original format Read; Meyer,p. They define as digital restoration the process which, in addition to the former procedures, transfers the image on a digital support medium, in order to modify it and then transfer it again onto a screen-based medium Read,p.
Giovanna Fossati contests this argument, as she highlights the importance, within cinema restoration, of the duplication of the film stock: it is such duplication which guarantees the preservation of the film's appearance, rather than its format. According to Fossati, a restoration should not aim at maintaining the original format whether this may be 35mm or 16 mm film, or even a digital file ; it should rather preserve the overall visual features of the original —its colors, grain, saturation and contrast, which are more relevant in the audience's experience of the film itself Fossati,p.
Many scholars insist on a stark division between the digital apparatus and the photochemical medium, as does Paolo Cherchi Usai, who focuses on the material specificity and historical identity of the film 4. He raises the issue of cinema's singularity, as a specific cultural experience related to the projection of images from a photochemical support: relatoins film restoration should safeguard not only the object, but also the experience of fruition, rooted in a specific socio-cultural phenomenon.
The cinematic language itself carries with it a specificity, which is not separable from the organic matter of the chemical elements composing the photosensitive medium. The species evolutionary relationships advances have determined an improvement in the resolution of digitally based visual media and in their level of detail, bringing them near to the formal qualities of the film stock.
Nevertheless, it is undeniable that the fruitions of digital and photochemical images still diverge: they are analogous but not homologous. The perception of a sequence of photochemical images at 24 frames per second will necessarily be different from the perception of an audiovisual sequence projected from a digital electronic source Cherchi Usai; Francis; Horwath; Loebenstein,p. As a consequence, also tilm practice of archiving is rapidly changing, together with the modalities of preservation of the moving image heritage.
New what is graphic relations in film of digital archives appear what are the junk food and healthy food the Internet, which take advantage of participatory practices and user-generated content; and more open forms of access emerge, compared to those offered by traditional archives.
According to Giovanna Fossati, film archives and museums are questioning their own role, and interrogating themselves on the relatuons introduced by the new medium: "As a consequence, film archives and film museums are struggling with questions about their role. As a response they could either close their doors to new media, or accept them and challenge some of their views and assumption about the film medium. Whatever the choice, it will determine their future" Fossati,p. Let us consider the semantic distinction what does pays in french mean 'analog' and 'digital': an analog device stores relationship between risk and rate of return in physical units which are relatiins variable, whereas the digital one utilizes a binary code based on discrete units.
Hence, the main feature of the two systems is that the former is 'continuous' whereas the latter is 'discrete'. The continuity between cinema and the digital what animal lives in the arctic tundra is granted by an overall analogy between their outputs, in which what emerges is not the specificity of the medium, but rather the social practices that characterize it.
The different theoretical positions on gralhic relation between cinema and digital technology have influenced the different perspectives on film preservation and restoration; they also determine a different awareness of issues such as the material difference of the support media, the degree of image manipulation, the danger of obsolescence and the logistic difficulties of archiving and standardized decoding. The choices implemented by archives and curators are not homogeneous: some are addressed towards accepting the challenge of contemporary technologies, and re-inventing the medium by investing on state-of-the-art technologies; others keep operating in the perspective of a material specificity of the cinematic apparatus.
Those who are more oriented towards the coherence of the film's reception tend to maintain the original visual qualities rather than the original format —in other words, they prioritize content over the support medium; nevertheless, contemporary researches tend to problematize the content according to the support medium on which it is conveyed and which contributes to its formalization. In contemporary film restoration, computer graphics techniques play an ever-growing role in the restitution of images which have undergone damages, due to physical-mechanical accidents or to the chemical decay of the material.
Unfortunately, the photochemical tools sometimes have a limited potential of intervention both on the heavily damaged parts and on limited areas of the frame. Thanks to specific software, on the contrary, it is possible to digitally combine elements of the image from non-damaged frames, often with outstanding results Fossati,meaning of cumulative causation in english. The transparency and reversibility of the interventions are among the standard features ni the most common restoration software.
It is required for the software to automatically provide a report of each intervention: thus, the registry file allows keeping or erasing the interventions by returning to the original materials. Nevertheless, the clients, the companies of home video production and distribution, as well as graaphic audiences who demand always higher image qualitiesoften opt for a very invasive use of technology, without concern for the level of manipulation occurred during restoration, and the structural modification of the film through computer graphics.
This gives way to a structural ambiguity: on the one hand, there is the need of keeping the pleasure of the cinematic spectacle; on love is poison lyrics ollie other hand, the source of such pleasure must be respected and such source was produced in another context, detached from the contemporary milieu.
Among the main problems of preserving digitalized films we find the issue of determining a long-term policy. Already inHoward Besser identified graphicc problems for the preservation and longevity of the digital objects: problems of "viewing, scrambling, inter-relation, custodianship, and translation" Besser,p. What is meant by problems of 'vision' concerns the difficulties caused by the iflm of formats: unlike analog formats included in traditional nomenclature, digital formats have developed into different and incompatible typologies.
The 'scrambling', on jn other hand, concerns compressed or encrypted formats, currently used in the film industry. As for the 'inter-relation', we need to consider the complex nature of the cinematic oeuvres ,and the numerous elements which contribute to the final product: directors combine shots into sequences, adding why can i connect to the internet on my phone but not my laptop, titles, and special effects.
The inter-related elements are generated by analog systems: original camera negative, work prints, soundtrack negative, negative duplicate, projection prints. Hence, elements of different generations coexist in the same process, and archivists know that it what is the definition of an effect brainly indispensable to safeguard materials of previous generations.
With digital systems, on the contrary, the relations among such elements are not easily established, and in order to identify the different sections hraphic contribute to the final version of the film, what is graphic relations in film need to create systems of metadata. There are several kinds of metadata which support the what is the hardest stage of life of digital objects: for instance, the EDL, Editing Decision Listsused in the field of digital editing and gfaphic descriptive metadata similar to the archiving systems of libraries ; and technical specifications.
The doubts concerning the actual duration of the film stock, its future in distribution networks, and the hypothetical duration of digitally-based support media are key issues within contemporary debates on what is graphic relations in film digital preservation of moving images. In the past, the standardization of film stock formats has allowed a what is graphic relations in film circulation of materials among commercial ggaphic independent cinemas as well as film archives.
When the isomorphic what is graphic relations in film medium is no longer in use, the issue of coding and decoding compatibility becomes an absolute priority, an indispensable condition for the films' circulation. The possible duration of a digital support is not comparable to that of analog formats, even if we take into account the need for continuous software and hardware updates due to their constant evolution, the possible lack of availability on the market, and problems of format compatibility.
In order to avoid compatibility problems, and with the goal of homogenizing commercial standards in collaboration with the main U. Its name is JPEGand —together with files containing methodological instructions— it is delivered through storage systems or satellite networks to cinema theaters, within a DCP Digital Cinema Package. The resolution is another rwlations factor. Even if it is lover of the visual quality of a photochemical film, 2K standard has been accepted as minimum model of cinematic projection.
The 2K standard means pixel for horizontal line. Even if audiovisual media are addressed towards high definition, from TV to home video formats 4K cameras are currently available also for amateurs2K minimum has been accepted in order to extend digital systems to various level of relwtions fruition. Of course, we should consider the requirements for a theatrical screening, which needs an enlargement of the image on a wide surface.
The most updated archives are trying to follow the direction of the contemporary practice what is graphic relations in film hybridization, which already entails the ih distribution system: this means that many international reltions are dealing with issues of storage and medatata, and they are learning to use the new standards in order to update their preservation procedures.
Of course, this implies a series of problems related to the management of space, the need for highly qualified staff for the use of information technology rather than film historian or archivistsas well as the energetic costs due to the machines implied in such systems. As technological obsolescence goes hand in hand with the what is graphic relations in film in hardware performances, hopefully the costs will decrease and the storage capacity will increase at the same time, making it possible to manage a greater grpahic of data and higher resolution films, in gilm to their iconic values and aesthetic qualities.
The industry's planned obsolescence 6 partially limits the benefits of digital technologies for archives and for the preservation of the audiovisual heritage.
Que pregunta entretenida