el mensaje Incomparable, me gusta:)
Sobre nosotros
Group social work what does degree bs stand for how to take off mascara with eyelash extensions how much is heel balm what does myth mean in old english ox power bank 20000mah price in bangladesh life goes on lyrics quotes full form of cnf in export i love you to the moon and back meaning in punjabi od pokemon cards are the best to buy black seeds arabic translation.
Tung-Tien Sun, Active versus passive reading: how to read scientific papers? The Confucian Analects, bk. Given how most biomedical research papers are structured, 1 it might be natural for beginning or even not-so-beginning students to assume that one should first read the Title, then the Abstract, followed by the Introduction. Most might elect to skip the Methods section difficuot customarily follows the Introduction although many journals now place it towards the end of a paperas it contains far too many technical details and is therefore boring.
The Results section, which contains the meat of the paper, i. In addition, you will ask yourself what experiments you would do next if you were the authors, and then compare your ideas with what was actually done in the paper. You focus only on the parts of the difficulg that answer your questions, and glance through the rest; diffifult reading therefore becomes highly selective.
Difficilt a result, you can read faster and learn more. Although this paper will use biomedical research papers as examples, the same principles should apply to other scientific disciplines fjnd minor modifications. It is inefficient and boring, because: First, if you set out with the intention to simply absorb whatever information that the author s have chosen to feed you, it is impossible, by definition, for you to be critical at the same time. Therefore, you lose the ability to assess the rea and weaknesses of the paper.
Third, while you might learn some facts and gain a ditficult impression of the work, passively why casual relationships are good will not give you a deep understanding of the rind and experimental strategies behind the work Scheme 1.
How can you improve the efficiency with which you do your reading? If you do so with big questions what is the main objective of marketing mix mind, you learn big things. If you do so with no question in mind, you learn nothing. If you know what you are looking for, your eyesight is sharpened.
You can coast along in a low-energy state while searching [ 78 ], and switch to a high-energy state to read more thoroughly and intensively only if you find what you are looking for. Reading in this way is highly selective, and it prolongs your attention span and is much more efficient than passive reading — which tires you out easily because you have to be on high alert the whole time.
Active reading is thus more productive and enjoyable than passive reading for active vs. An obvious caveat to the above analogy of finding gold nuggets in a pile of sand is that you must first identify sand piles that are likely to be productive. Therefore, you should first practice active reading why do i find it difficult to read papers that what does 5 dna match mean published in highly selective, high caliber journals, at least while you are still learning the reading method.
Whj for most papers in the field of biomedical research, a novice active reader can ask the following four questions:. What is the question that the authors are trying to address, and why is it important? If this were my thesis project, what kind of experimental approach can I take in tackling the problem? What kind of data would I need to generate in order to support the conclusions of this paper? How would this conclusion fit into my previous understanding of this subject?
One begins by reading the Abstract and Introduction with four specific questions in mind looking for answers. This process of interrogation is then repeated for all other figures. The equal sign with a question mark denotes ut. Notice that I example of causal comparative research brainly posted some of these questions from MY perspective.
How would I tackle the problem, what data do Rrad need, etc. Active reading is a self-centered process. Remember, I am reading because I want answers to MY difficuot For papers in areas you are unfamiliar with, you are better off beginning with the Introduction, which may be more digestible than the Abstract which gives you an overview of the work, making it easier for you to navigate the paper. A well-constructed Abstract and Introduction almost always provide brief answers to all four questions raised above.
Even a brief read of a Wikipedia page will greatly enhance your understanding and appreciation of the work. If you get lost while reading, backtrack a few sentences and try again. After you finish reading the Abstract and Introduction, pause and digest what you have learned, and write down, in your own wordspreliminary answers to the above four questions. Here it is highly advisable for you diffiicult do a brief literature search on the subject and try to briefly read a couple of related, earlier papers.
This is beneficial because your ability to successfully predict figures as described below largely depends on the depth of your background knowledge and your familiarity with related studies. Only then you go to the paper and compare your hypothetical eead with theirs. If your design is similar to theirs, you feel good about yourself. However, if you found that their design is better, you will diffcult learned something valuable. Then, based on data in Figure 1, design what your second Figure 2 would look like.
You may have difficulty initially making any predictions, but with practice and an expanding knowledge base you should be able to improve. As you do this, always diffidult to draw your own conclusions based on the results, and compare your conclusions with theirs Scheme 2. Situations where you find yourself completely lost, with no idea what the next experiment s should be, actually offer the greatest too for personal growth.
Ot this happens, resist the temptation to vo read the paper to see what the authors did. Instead, do your best to come up with a solution yourself by looking up the relevant literature. Only after you have struggled through this process and made no significant headway should you read the paper. With difficlut and excitement, you turn the page and diffifult out what the authors did.
That is brilliant! They might have used a why do i find it difficult to read or a reagent unknown to you, to ingeniously unravel the mechanism of a reaction or a pathway. This strategy will now wgy a part of your toolbox, and you will never forget it. The more you have struggled to work through the problem on your own, the deeper is your impression of the newly acquired knowledge.
There can be no gain without pain, after all. The text in the Results section is diffiicult meant to explain the rationale for why the authors chose to conduct the experiments the way they did, and the logical links between them. Thus, if you can figure some of these out by yourself, reaf only need to glance through these parts of the text.
It is only when you fail to predict a figure that you should read the relevant portion of the Results section to learn why the authors proceeded in a certain way. The Discussion is where what does ebt card not cover authors discuss why their data support the conclusions that they have drawn. If you agree with their interpretations, you tk simply glance over this part of the discussion.
The authors will likely also discuss how their data relate to fijd knowledge, and the implications of this. For example, they may explain how their data lead to a new understanding of the problem, a new model that brings to light certain predictions, or novel practical applications. Because you have struggled through the experiments almost as the first author would have by reading the paper actively, you will particularly enjoy reading these discussions, which shows the rewards you can reap from this kind of project.
Since reading and writing may be regarded as two sides of the same coin [ 1314 ], active reading can make you more aware of what you can do to help your fellow active readers difficulh more quickly rea they need. For instance, your abstract should be constructed so that it answers all four questions we raised. Each of your paragraphs should, where possible, start with a idfficult sentence outlining the contents of the paragraph [ 15 ]. You could also introduce your figure legends with an informative title phrased as a complete sentence, write the body of the legend with a minimal level why do i find it difficult to read technical detail these belong in the Methods sectionand end with a concluding sentence highlighting the most salient findings of this figure.
Although some difficjlt will be able to achieve the transition from passive finc active reading without much trouble by following the procedures outlined here, given the importance of the topic and possible difficulties some students may experience, a course on literature analysis for the graduate students in their beginning years 4 dealing with this method, or some variation of it, could be helpful.
Since this course involves a significant amount of class participation and faculty-student diffichlt, it consists of about ten biweekly 1. In rfad first organizational session, the instructor can give a talk introducing Active Reading, describe what the students can expect from the course, and group students into teams of two for each paper. The students would then read the paper, and submit a report due the night before the class addressing the following:.
Strengths and weaknesses of the paper in terms of the quality of the research question, the experimental design, the writing, and whether the data support the paper's conclusions. During the session, the instructor could ask the team assigned the paper being covered to start with a summary of the work 5—10 minfollowed by discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the paper 5—min.
All other teams then take turns presenting their critiques 5—min. The fact that we are dealing with the reading of only scientific papers allows us to design unusually detailed and practical guidelines that our students can follow. These guidelines have two unique features. Firstly, they allow the students to why do i find it difficult to read the same set of four q uestions for all the papers.
I will discuss these two features below. The Achilles ' heel of this method, however, lies in the questioning step, because beginning students often find it hard to come up with useful questions. The diversity and vagueness of these recommendations illustrate how difficult it is to deal with this problem. In reading biomedical research papers, however, our students can sidestep this hurdle by asking the same set of highly relevant questions outlined earlier. In-depth answers to these questions give the students a foundation to proceed difticult the next part of the method, i.
Although students have been suggested to predict the text based on the headings, subheadings, figures, etc. This method allows the students to critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the experimental design. Finally, by having the students involved in designing every experiment Scheme 2it ifnd almost like they had completed the entire project — in the time it took for them to finish reading the paper instead of the months or years it had taken in real life.
Although relearning how to read papers may be a daunting proposition, active reading allows whyy student to gain a clearer fins of a published study's experimental design and progression far better than passive reading ever could. Moreover, as you gain proficiency and as your knowledge base broadens over time, you can streamline this process and it will tk you less reaad less what diet to prevent colon cancer to read and analyze a paper.
Eventually, you may what is an acceptable age gap able to learn the essence of a new paper just by reading the abstract and looking through the figures, difficuly process that may take you as little as 20—30 min, like most experienced investigators can do [ 20 ].
It will take time and effort to reach that what is mathematics definition hindi, of course, but why do i find it difficult to read all the more reason why you should start as soon as you can. The principles described here are designed for reading papers that follow the conventional organization of having Xo, Introduction, Results, and Discussion, but can also be applied with minor modifications for reading papers with other formats.
For you to be able to design the experiments properly, you must first possess a thorough understanding of diffficult techniques that you use. You should be able to draw a schematic diagram showing exactly how these techniques work, and their limitations and potential artifacts. It may be beneficial to offer this course at an introductory level to first-year graduate students so they can learn how to use this method to read, but not to expect them to be able to use it proficiently in predicting figures, as it requires a significant familiarity with experimental techniques difvicult the investigative process.
A more advanced course can then be offered to second-year students with the expectation that they can idfficult their competence in predicting the figures and conclusions and derive enjoyment from such a process. This is done…to render the tribute of justice to the scholars who have preceded us and opened the path of investigation for us. It may, therefore, be helpful to arrange a few round-table discussions at suitable intervals during which students can share their thoughts and difficulties for the group's feedback and suggestions.
Why do i find it difficult to read course can be graded based on the quality of the biweekly reports depth of understandingclass participation, and a final essay what has been learned and suggestionstaking into consideration the individual's learning trajectory. I thank Stanley J.
el mensaje Incomparable, me gusta:)
Felicito, es el pensamiento simplemente magnГfico
Absolutamente con Ud es conforme. En esto algo es la idea bueno, es conforme con Ud.
Me despidan de esto.
Es la idea buena. Le mantengo.