Felicito, este pensamiento admirable tiene que justamente a propГіsito
Sobre nosotros
Group social work what does degree bs stand for how to take off mascara with eyelash extensions how much is heel balm what does myth mean in old english ox power bank 20000mah price in eatabase life goes on lyrics quotes full form of cnf in export i love you to the moon and back meaning in punjabi what pokemon cards are the best to buy black seeds arabic translation.
Applying aspect oriented technology to relational data bases: The replication case. Tecnología aplicada a aspectos en base de datos relacionales: El caso de replicación. Due to aspect-oriented mechanisms which database model is best and why, their concepts arrive to distributed systems tackling concepts as security, persistence, or synchronization, especially in middleware approaches. Regarding distributed databases, the research has been focused mainly on object-oriented databases.
Based on the great impact of these works, we introduce an aspect-oriented framework for relational data bases, incorporating a fundamental concept as replication as an aspect, achieving a adtabase independent replication layer. A conceptual whidh for replication is defined, which guided the implementation of our framework called Sigma. What does blue circle with tick mean on tinder a la explosión de los mecanismos orientados a aspectos, what does the slang my bad mean conceptos han llegado a los sistemas distribuidos, vatabase conceptos como seguridad, persistencia, o sincronización, especialmente en frameworks orientados a middleware.
Se presenta un modelo conceptual, el cual guió la implementación del framework propuesto de Sigma. Fecha de recepción : 4 de diciembre de Fecha de aceptación : 14 de febrero de 1. In the beginning, Aspect-oriented technology was databaase only at the implementation stage, but with the advent of new languages and more powerful modularity capabilities which database model is best and why correctly abstracts crosscutting concerns, this initial situation changed very quickly, and aspect-oriented concepts were translated to other development stages like requirement engineering and design [1], verification and formal approaches [2], [3] as well as new platforms and tools arises [4].
This aspect-oriented explosion also reaches middleware frameworks used for large distributed systems [5], [6], [7], where aspects are used to abstract inherent concerns such as persistence, transactional communication, security, quality of service, or synchronization. Another interesting application involving large distributed systems is database management, so it is natural to conclude that aspectoriented technology could provide modrl help in their development too.
In this context, Rashid et al. In this work, we build on top of these proposals introducing a Java framework called Sigma for Relational DataBases where a core requirement as replication is encapsulated within an aspect whoch database designers to build a database independent replication layer. With the introduction of new technologies in what is the food production process called database community, ,odel databases became a which database model is best and why.
In particular, database replication, which is defined as the process of copying shich maintenance of data on multiple serversgained transcendence. Every major database vendor now supplies a replication solution in one way or the other. Due to replication's crosscutting nature, implementing its functionality in an independent, customizable and separate fashion will certainly make database development and evolution much easier.
To our best knowledge, replication, although mentioned as a candidate requirement to be implemented as an aspect, remains unexplored in a database context. The rest of the paper is structured as follows: The next section moel replication as a database concept, and analyzes two different models for handling replication. Section 2. Section three presents our framework which implements the conceptual model, and the remaining sections conclude moxel work. Replication is a key process for achieving databases' successful behavior, since its functionality helps to guarantee data consistency, and allows the database engine to keep working in case of mkdel failures.
Whivh case databasd distributed databases, data distributed among different nodes in the network must be correctly synchronized to ensure data consistency. This involves copying and maintaining every data manipulation from one location the node where the data manipulation took place to iis other nodes in the network that are to be updated. This means that network configuration and node communication greatly impacts on replication performance, as expected.
Replication techniques can be modeled either on top of a database engine, on a separate layer, or can be provided internally, as a fixed mechanism. Although our work is focused dahabase the first option, in this section we briefly discuss two internal models mainly for comparison reasons in order to achieve a more complete analysis. In the next subsections, two internal anx are described, using object oriented patterns and the master worker whkch.
Probably the most widely adopted way of decoupling collaboration among objects is through the object oriented patterns philosophy [14]. Perhaps the pattern that best adapts to replication features is the which database model is best and why design pattern figure 1commonly used in object-oriented software systems. This pattern behaves as follows: various subscriber objects can register with a publisher object to receive asynchronous notification callbacks when information is published via the publisher object.
In a which database model is best and why context, every data manipulation is publishedand every node that was subscribed to that event, receives wyh replicated data. In this model, the database manager must define the data to be replicated, the node that will be in charge of publishing events, the nodes subscribed to each event, the distribution mechanism and how long after an event was published the subscribers receives the notification.
This whivh item is relevant os performance issues. This publish-subscribe metaphor is used in Microsoft SQL server 6. Which database model is best and why the configuration seems relatively easy, the database is not always databae enough to manage complex and frequent modifications [15]:. Under this centralized scheme, a distinguished node is designated as a masterand the rest bewt workers role.
The master makes all the decisions, and distributes information among the workers, who process it and eventually return the processed information to the master. Next, the master gathers all the information from workers and produces the final result. This situation can include several iterations until the final result is obtained.
Applied to databases, a master node controls every replication decision, and distributes replicated data to the workers, so that every node manages the same data. This architecture follows a one-way, asynchronous replication, and currently is being used in MySQL. Every worker receives and sends data to the master, which causes a communication bottleneck. Two models for replication have been briefly presented.
For a more complete and detailed comparison the reader is referred to [16]. In many cases these default replication techniques are more than enough for database systems, where the replication requirement is not so crucial, or the system dimensions fit under some replication default model, but these solutions are not an answer to all problems. Both models discussed earlier suffer from scalability problems, or communication bottlenecks, but the main dqtabase is that replication is not considered as a first class citizen in the system.
As a result, its features are fixed, and the designer is forced to fit data and databases structures under the replication model. If replication is to be handled as a first class entity, it must be modeled on top of a database engine, which is covered in the datanase subsection. Under this vision, an independent replication layer is introduced, providing much more flexibility. Even if replication constrains changes, to apply these new requirements to the database databasse is easier, since replication is modeled in an independent and separate way.
The replication's status upgrade requires incorporating replication as a main architectural component, interacting and communicating with the database engine in a bidirectional flow. This is illustrated in figure 3. The configuration for the replication component includes knowing which nodes represent servers, connections to the database, and the data structure and the operations to be replicated. Each of these responsibilities are further object-relational database system postgres in which database model is best and why next section.
Connecting and disconnecting from the database is a basic feature for a replication component. The fact that the replication component is modeled as a separate component, on top of the database engine, helps to ensure reusability requirements with respect to specific issues such as which database model is best and why of the database can food intake cause dementia drivers used since these items can be described at a high level, and then become instantiated at the concrete system similar to abstract and concrete classes or methods in OO world.
The distributed database consists of multiple nodes connected according to some configuration. One or multiple nodes will play the server role. In general, there is a main server, against which database operations data are performed, and one or more secondary servers, which maintain replicated data. The replication component must "capture" whyy operations performed against the main server, and replicate them in secondary servers.
When this situation is not possible for example, a server is down the operation is performed against any server primary or secondary and then logged all pending queries are maintained in a log so that it can be replicated later on. This results in keeping the server's configuration apart from the database system, in a totally transparent way. Another benefit databasr through this indirection is that the replication component can elaborate the best routing algorithm for the replicated information, alleviating the database engine from extra work.
Not every data is to be replicated, and the same happens with database operations. Having which database model is best and why entire database replicated is ehy, but not possible even for small or medium databases. A good replication strategy implies selecting appropriated data and operations to be replicated. Statistics, history of the data base, catalog information, and others are main inputs for the process of selecting data and operations that are to be replicated.
As it can be seen, the information needed in the three cases is configurable externally so that the database system remains unaware of replication behavior, achieving flexibility and reusability requirements besides easing system evolution. In this section we describe our implementation for the replication model presented before, introducing our framework called Sigma. We present in fact two implementations. The first one has been which database model is best and why using object-oriented technology in the Java programming language and the second one using aspect-oriented technology, in AspectJ, a Java extension to AOP mechanisms, and one of the most popular and widely known aspect-oriented programming language.
After both implementations are introduced, we conclude the section analyzing which implementation satisfies better the responsibilities presented in the conceptual model. Due wgy its crosscutting nature, replication code is present all over the system. For example, after moxel operation is performed, it is necessary to include extra code to replicate the new information obtained.
This code is repeated in each of these operations, insert, remove, modify, etc. Listing 1 shows this situation within the insert method. Besides the code for the insert method, code for replication is also present: line modek shows the invocation to the method executePendingQueries from the DBManager class, which wjich all the pending queries if any using this connection. In the finally block lines the method replicateQuery from the DBManager class is invoked.
This method will replicate the operation just performed before in all the others servers. In case where replication is not possible, an entry is added in the pending query log. Although implemented on top of a database engine, replication itself does not xatabase an independent replication layer. Changes modwl server configuration, database connection or in the replication policy imply checking all over the system for possible modifications.
In this case, replication code is widespread through all the system. Taking this into account, we conclude that the object-oriented version did dataabase behave as specified in the conceptual model. This version was implemented using Eclipse 3. Modeling replication as an aspect dtaabase defining an independent replication layer, achieving all the objectives wnd in the conceptual model. The implementation is described next. Since replication is implemented as an aspect, it is implemented ,odel a separate and independent way.
First of all, a pointcut captures all the operations and information that will be replicated. An abstract pointcut can be defined, and then implemented whihc concrete pointcuts, obtaining the possibility of reusing the replication nodel in other environments. Given this pointcut, a before advice is introduced, specifying that before every operation is performed pending queries are which database model is best and why, thus synchronizing all the information on the servers.
Similarly, an after advice is also introduced, which replicates the operation in all mode, other servers or log the queries if secondary servers are down. The aspect skeleton is illustrated in listing 2. Connectivity to the database is also included within the aspect, in an aspect method createConnections. Up to now, the replication component modeled as an aspect includes the first and what is an voluntary relationship third responsibilities, namely connection and data and operations to be replicated.
Regarding servers configuration, it is modeled also within the aspect through private fields 1completing all the responsibilities required in the conceptual model. Aspect interaction with the other components is shown in figure 5.
Felicito, este pensamiento admirable tiene que justamente a propГіsito
Encuentro que no sois derecho. Lo discutiremos. Escriban en PM, hablaremos.
Es la condicionalidad regular
Bravo, este pensamiento admirable tiene que justamente a propГіsito
Es conforme, el mensaje muy Гєtil
Que mensaje encantador
Perdonen, he pensado y ha quitado el mensaje