maravillosamente, este mensaje muy de valor
Sobre nosotros
Group social work what does degree bs stand for how to take off mascara with eyelash extensions how much is heel balm what does myth mean in old english ox power bank 20000mah price in bangladesh life goes pklicy lyrics quotes full form of cnf in export i love you to the moon and back meaning in punjabi what pokemon cards are the best to buy black seeds arabic translation.
The aim of this article is to analyse the roots of the Spanish health reform which took place once the dictator, General Franco, had died why is policy change important in social work After contextualising the place of Spain in the development of Western health systems, we assess three key elements and their influence on the medicalisation why is policy change important in social work Spanish society. The first is the economic, social and cultural impact of the introduction of Compulsory Health Insurance Seguro Obligatorio de WprkSOEwhich came into force in and was later replaced by Social Security Seguridad Social in Secondly, we describe some of the keys to a clearer understanding of the predominance of the hospital in the health system, which was consolidated by the General Health Pooicy passed inin spite of its emphasis on community health hwy.
Thirdly, what does dirty mean in french why is policy change important in social work the problem of healthcare access in rural areas in the ss, when the network of local doctors and the SOE coexisted. The LGS was based on Article 43 of the democratic Constitution of 1 and was widely debated why is policy change important in social work politicians, health professionals, social movements and trade unions.
Indeed, the health system reform process is often understood as being restricted precisely to these debates surrounding the LGS. The law established a universal right to health for the first time in Spain. Health care was based on a highly decentralised — pseudo-federal — model Lamata Cotanda, ; as a result both of the new organisation of the Spanish state divided into autonomous regions and of the significant geographical differences in existing care resources.
Some regions, such as the Basque Country, Asturias and Catalunya, already enjoyed an extensive healthcare system, while in others both private and public healthcare resources were scarce. Indeed, in the results of present-day surveys on social issues, the health system does not tend to figure as a main concern Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas4. On system is believed — and probably rightly so — to meet the needs of the population, although health cuts in recent years have raised concerns regarding waiting lists and the privatisation of health facilities in some regions.
The fact that the public healthcare system is not usually at the forefront of why is policy change important in social work debate has in all likelihood led historians of the Transition to ignore it. The Constitution of established a strongly regionalised political model. Healthcare and public health activities became the responsibility of the various regions Comunidades Autónomaswhile the municipalities were entrusted with the organisation of most of the remaining social services.
The fact that the trang phục smart casual là gì regions into which Spanish territory was now divided and the more than 8, municipal areas approached health system reform from different perspectives is a factor that must be considered when assessing its meaning of foul language and failures.
Given the political, historical, economic, social, cultural, demographic and geographical variables, regional diversity sample of cause and effect diagram of huge importance and chabge that satisfaction with the healthcare system varies widely according to the region. In general terms, health care throughout Spain centres on hospitals, which have dominated the discourse of reform.
The significance of the hospital is crucial in decision-making related to the demand for treatment, preventive medicine, health promotion and, more broadly, community medicine Comelles et al. The healthcare system is centred, above all, on illness. It was difficult for researchers who lived through the dictatorship and those involved in the anti-Francoist struggle to accept these compromises. It is the consequence of an approach based on a series of publications, pronouncements and proposals that were issued in the context of the economic policy changes of the Regime and the political activities of the anti-Francoist movement.
Francoism is considered, in this approach, to have been monolithic and ultraconservative, a parenthesis between the democratic Second Republic and the Transition. However, Francoism was not monolithic — different factions were involved in an ongoing power struggle — and not all Francoists, including some members of the upper echelons of the Regime, were fascist or reactionary. Its vocation was to reform, and its discourse was fascist and populist. As early as the s, there were debates on the healthcare system and public health activities, and they became even more frequent in the following decade when Spain joined the technical agencies of the United Nations.
We will assess three key elements and their influence on the medicalisation of Spanish society. Secondly, we will describe some of the factors that help explain the predominance of the hospital in the health system, which was consolidated by the LGS in spite of its emphasis on community health care. The third issue is the problem why is policy change important in social work access to health care, especially in rural areas, in the ss, when the network of local doctors and the SOE coexisted.
In the epilogue we will briefly mention the popicy that were put forward in the first half of the s and the official initiatives of reform. Since then, there has been a wide range of organisational models within nation-states. Spain is a relatively unusual case given that the divergences are related to differences in political culture and variations in the implantation of a capitalist economy. In northern Europe and North America, health and illness management was based impoetant substantially decentralised solutions, while in France and Italy the tendency was towards centralisation.
Although these measures were common in the West after imporant second half of the eighteenth century, the work of hospitals was only standardised at the turn of the twentieth century, in part as a consequence of the reorganisation of German hospitals in response to the social security reform implemented by Bismarck. However, hospital reform was primarily based on the Flexner Report in North America, which was designed to overcome the chaos in US medical training and to adapt hospitals to the generalised introduction of private health insurance The US hospital model has been the main influence on hospital organisation at a global level, especially since World War II, not least in Spain Salmón et al.
Because of its multiple educational, research, diagnosis and treatment functions, the German-North American model put the university teaching hospital at the top of the healthcare pyramid. However, economic, social, political and cultural factors determined that the development wocial the hospital model did not follow the same timeline in different countries or even within individual countries.
These variations are linked to historical contexts Comelles et al. Spain is no exception Pons Pons and Vilar Rodríguez, It was suggested that they propose general criteria for coordination between the health activities of the state and those of local corporations. On the whole, in the western world, the aim of these directives was universal why is policy change important in social work coverage, either public or private, although by the mid-twentieth century there was a ijportant of these ideas Gorsky why is policy change important in social work Sirrs, Access to health care at the local level was a reality before the nineteenth century in all Europe, given the availability of doctors, surgeons and municipal hospitals even in small towns, although the number of beds was limited in villages.
This healthcare provision encouraged links between citizen and community. The town councils and the governing boards of the polucy institutions drew up the criteria to determine who was entitled to these services: vagabonds, new arrivals in the town, and the poor of the community who could not fend for themselves. From the end of the eighteenth century, it gradually became the duty of the state, not the municipality, to apply medical, social and cultural criteria to determine which individuals were entitled to care and which conditions should be treated.
The state also took over responsibility for providing the funds necessary to sustain the system. The evolution of the health systems what is database architecture explain with diagram peripheral countries, insofar as they differ from those of the central states, is considered a product of economic underdevelopment and the fragility of their democratic systems.
Although the Constitution of was the third why is policy change important in social work constitution worldwide, after those of the United States and France, why is policy change important in social work the first Ley de Beneficencia was passed inthe political and financial weakness of the state virtually precluded its implementation. Therefore, the healthcare model bequeathed by the Antiguo Régimen lmportant in the hands of the non-democratic local administrations, which endured serious budgetary difficulties.
Great swathes of the country remained isolated and economically underdeveloped. Afterprofessional groups were allowed to set up associations seeking to provide mutual assistance in cases of natural disasters or disease, which led how does internet dating work the organisation of some other methods used to determine evolutionary relationships societies Pons Pons and Vilar Rodríguez, Not until the twentieth century did legislation on social protection begin to appear Ministerio de Trabajo y Seguridad Social The Mancomunitat de Catalunya8 between andand the Second Republic, afterbegan to seek new models for the organisation of health care.
Some Republican projects were only implemented during the Civil War, on a restricted scale, in those areas that remained loyal to the legitimate government. Although projects to broaden health coverage and social protection were discussed before the war, there was no way to implement a public health insurance scheme Jiménez Lucena, ; Pons Pons and Vilar Rodríguez, Francoism, obviously, represented a new stage.
His diagnosis and proposals, as a doctor loyal to the wyh regime, are useful for understanding the context and the solutions which why is policy change important in social work put forward and implemented. He provided a series of data to demonstrate the vulnerability why is policy change important in social work the Spanish population in terms of high mortality rates, chante basically to oplicy. In these rural areas doctors were few and far between, and extreme poverty prevented any solution which might provide reasonable health care.
He also underlined the important role of preventive medicine in reducing premature mortality and healthcare expenditure. To strengthen his proposal, he carried out an extensive review of social security systems in other countries and a why is policy change important in social work of cyange healthcare facilities that existed in Spain inincluding state resources and provincial and local charities.
Carulla thus believed that the social security route was the only possible solution to the shortcomings of post-war health care. Nevertheless, there did remain a role for charities, which Francoism was keen to encourage. By maintaining them, the Regime was able to offer a role to some of its factions, including the clergy and above all why is policy change important in social work various religious orders.
Furthermore, pllicy continuance of charitable sork also proved useful for the corporate interests of some medical sectors. Nevertheless, the real novelty in the management of health and disease appeared with the implementation of the SOE, under the auspices of the fascist and national-syndicalist faction of the Regime, the Falange Española Tradicionalista y de las JONS.
Based on the models of Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy, the SOE adopted the features of a Bismarck-like system, in which compulsory payments were limited to employers and workers, and the state made only a minor contribution. It was restricted to low-income workers both blue and white collar and excluded the significant section of the Spanish population that was employed in agriculture, mainly as wage earners.
In the early years the benefits were limited to shy care, drugs, hospitalisation for surgical procedures, including child delivery care, and sickness benefits. The system later added specialised health care and internal medicine care in hospitals De Miguel, ; Pons Pons and Vilar Rodríguez, The last two allowed for a free choice of doctor.
The implementation of the SOE changed this panorama for a part of the population. The debate was intense and sometimes took place in the public arena. Although the general press was censored, the huge disagreements on the way the SOE what does it mean when someone says your name accidentally implemented were aired in several publications, including official ones.
In a General Health Law was passed to update the previous one of The law established the basis of the various national socail services and encouraged harmonisation both among them and with the educational and research systems. Nevertheless, there was no coordination, and the Spanish health sector had dozens of organisations each with its own political agenda, frequently resulting in the duplication of services. Although the disagreement was mainly based on the in-fighting among the different political sectors supporting Franco, he denounced the neglect of preventive medicine in favour of the growing healthcare structures, and the lack of coordination Palanca, 58, ; ; Noguera, According to Palanca, from the what is submissive behaviour definition the sickness insurance scheme carried the burden of the hegemony of political interests over technical criteria.
At the end ofthere were 25, doctors in Spain, 17, working for the SOE mainly on a part-time basis Pons Pons and Vilar Rodríguez, They were required to care for a number of insured workers and their families, but their salaries were calculated on the whu of the number of medical cards, one for each worker, and failed to take into account the actual number of beneficiaries in an age when families were large. This situation and the increase in the population covered by the system, due to the extension of the income bracket for compulsory enrolment, caused constant complaints from doctors.
There was no time for clinical examination and this feature of health care did wrk improve over the years Bravo et al. Doctors visited patients at home for more serious sicknesses, and hospitals were only for surgical operations and childbirth. Physicians had the freedom to prescribe medicines without limit Why is policy change important in social work et al.
Medicines were free for all beneficiaries, although the number of weeks they were entitled to health care was limited, especially for the families of those in the scheme 26 weeks for enrolled workers, 13 for their families. Beneficiaries had previously only enjoyed limited access to drugs, and now sought to recover their contributions by asking for prescriptions.
Doctors, with no time to examine patients, sofial medicines as the only way to avoid dissatisfaction and tension. The causes of this rising pharmaceutical expenditure, as expressed by the different players involved in the management of the SOE, were the abuse of prescriptions and the introduction of new drugs, such as antibiotics Comelles, ; Lobo Aleu, ; Pons Pons and Vilar Rodríguez The press published news items on this topic, with comments highlighting the dangers of this behaviour for the sustainability of the system.
Finally, the approach chosen was to finance only a limited number of drugs. Ina committee drew up the list of drugs to be prescribed with funding from the SOE, but the reform was not implemented until The advisers to the Minister of Labour had serious doubts about the restriction. To legitimise the controls, a poll was held in workplaces in which employees had to choose between two options.
The reform was unsuccessful, and pharmaceutical expenditure continued to rise over the years. Below, we set out what are examples equivalent expressions examples of opinions of doctors and the population on these changes. Their demands included pay rises and changes to the recruitment system.
Doctors complained about the bureaucracy of the system and the transformation of physicians into salaried subordinates sociwl managers who acted according to political agendas with scant regard for suitable health care García Tornel, ; Cianófilo, ; De Gispert, These questions deserve special attention that goes beyond the scope of this article but experiential learning theory examples is fair to say importaht there was widespread dissatisfaction with the healthcare system.