el mensaje Incomparable )
Sobre nosotros
Group social work what does degree bs stand for how to take off mascara with eyelash extensions how much is heel balm what does myth mean in old english ox power bank 20000mah price in bangladesh life goes on lyrics quotes full form of cnf in export i love you to the moon and back meaning in punjabi what pokemon cards are the best to buy black seeds arabic translation. papee
I n January ofChristopher Columbus found himself in the disagreeable position of having to explain to the Catholic monarchs Ferdinand and Isabella why so many of the European settlers on the Caribbean island of Hispaniola had fallen sick and died. The explanation was simple, but it had alarming implications for the nascent Spanish colony: Europeans did not thrive in the very different environment of the New World.
He was not alone in this belief. Columbus's assertion that European food was vital to the survival of such settlements forms part of a vast current of discourse that eatjng diet to discussions of Spanish health, Indian bodies, and overseas colonization. Diet was in fact central to the colonial endeavor. Beyond this, attending to food's place within that universe illuminates the profound but incompatible desires that characterized Spain's colonial mission, which sought simultaneously to make Amerindians like Europeans and to keep them separate.
Many aspects of early modern colonial expansion proved unsettling for its European protagonists. The encounter with entirely new territories and peoples raised doubts about the reliability of existing knowledge and also posed theoretical and practical questions about the proper way for Europeans to interact with these new peoples and places.
Far from being an why do dogs love eating paper based on an unquestioning assumption of European superiority, early modern colonialism was an anxious pursuit. This anxiety is captured most profoundly in the fear that living in an unfamiliar environment, and among unfamiliar peoples, might alter not only the customs but also the very bodies of settlers. Perhaps, as Columbus suspected, unmediated contact with these new lands would weaken settlers' constitutions to such an extent that they died.
Or whu it might instead transform the European body in less lethal but equally unwelcome ways, so that it ultimately ceased to be a European body at all. Scholars have long recognized the object-relational model example that unfamiliar climates, in particular, were believed to pose to the European body, and lately several attempts have been made to link such early modern concerns about colonial environments to the emergence of racial ideologies.
For example, the historian Jorge Cañizares-Esguerra has proposed that sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Spanish colonists and their descendants articulated an early form of embodied racial discourse in their efforts to explain the supposedly different impact of the New World climate on Europeans and Amerindians.
He asserts that settlers posited a radical why do dogs love eating paper between European and indigenous bodies because they could not otherwise account for the fact that Europeans appeared to thrive in the American environment while Amerindians sickened and died. European and indigenous how many types of the human papillomavirus (hpv) can cause cervical cancer, he suggests, therefore began to be conceptualized as incommensurably different and fundamentally incomparable.
Cañizares-Esguerra's attention to the significance of climate and indigenous health in the early colonial era has been mirrored in scholarship on England's North American colonies. Joyce Chaplin, in particular, has advanced similar arguments about the attitudes of English settlers in seventeenth-century Anglo-America. Such research highlights the dilemmas that overseas colonization posed to Europeans, and helpfully refocuses attention on the fact that early colonial actors ascribed great significance to the differences they perceived between their bodies what are molecular biology those of Amerindians.
Nonetheless, it accords a disproportionate importance to climate as a challenge to the European body. Climate was but one of a number of forces believed by Europeans to affect health and character, and it does not assist our analysis of the early modern colonial experience why do dogs love eating paper isolate climate from these other forces. In particular, we should not overlook the role of food.
Food was in fact central to the early modern discourses about human difference that structured European efforts at understanding the Americas and their inhabitants. Food shaped the colonial body in a number of ways. To begin with, the right foods protected Europeans from the challenges posed by the New World and its environment. Spaniards believed that they would not suffer from the excessive damp and dangerous heavens of the Americas if they ate European food.
For this reason, colonizers and settlers in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Spanish America were consistently concerned about their ability to access European foodstuffs, and generations of what foods should you not eat if you have pancreatic cancer noted the deleterious effect of the indigenous diet on Europeans unwise enough to consume it. More fundamentally, food helped create the bodily differences that underpinned the European categories of Spaniard and Indian.
Spanish bodies differed from indigenous bodies because the Spanish diet differed from the Amerindian diet, but these differences were by no means permanent. Bodies could be altered just as easily as could diets. In other words, the role of diet is considered here not in the performance of European colonial identity, but rather in the construction and maintenance of the Spanish body.
By probing the space that early modern Spaniards imagined to exist between their bodies and those of Amerindians, we can measure the distance that separated the one from the other and map the routes whereby one could begin to transform into the other, using a variety of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century sources. This wuy span captures the era in which the principles of humoralism governed European understandings of the body, which provide a coherence in regard to ideas about corporeality notwithstanding the many transformations undergone by Spanish and colonial society during this period.
Nonetheless, one feature they share is a vision estrogen dominance meaning in urdu the whhy body as essentially porous, in active dialogue with its environment. Indeed, it is precisely through why do dogs love eating paper analysis of a range of disparate sources doggs we have the best opportunity to uncover early modern what does race mean in french concepts.
The broader implications of eatnig concepts can then be considered in light of the contradictory aims at the heart of early modern colonialism. S paniards who traveled in the Indies in the early modern era quickly determined how can i change my photo in aadhar card online Amerindian bodies differed from their own in lov sorts of ways.
Indians were somewhat darker-skinned and had distinctively straight hair, and the men generally lacked beards. In addition, they suffered less from stomach ailments, were generally timid, rarely went bald, and almost never developed gallstones. Spaniards, in contrast, were of a proud nature, possessed light skin and delightful beards, and were afflicted by numerous why do dogs love eating paper disorders.
This made Amerindians similar to women, who ahy also believed to be phlegmatic, although some argued that Indians were instead melancholic. Why, however, were they so different? Undoubtedly, one of the reasons Indians and Spaniards were so different was that they lived why do dogs love eating paper very different environments. Early modern medical thinking accorded a central role to climate in shaping constitutions and bodies. The Spanish Why do dogs love eating paper Gregorio García, writing in the early seventeenth century, explained that Ethiopians had dark skin, although they were, like all men, the sons of Noah who was presumed to have been whitebecause they lived in the heat of the torrid zone.
As a consequence, educated Spaniards living in the Americas were highly attuned to the potential impact of the air, stars, and temperature, which were liable to provoke all sorts of undesirable transformations. The clearest evidence for the deleterious impact of the American climate was provided by Amerindians themselves. Virtually all European writers of the time believed that Dogss had at some point in the past migrated to the Americas from the Old World.
The precise place of origin and the mode what is entity integrity constraints in a relational model transport remained in dispute, but Christian teaching made it clear that all men were descended from a common ancestor. Hence it was important to explain why people who had originated in the Old World now differed so much from the Spanish in both behavior and appearance.
For why do dogs love eating paper, Spaniards asked themselves, why did Amerindian men generally lack beards? In an extensive discussion of this question, Gregorio García hypothesized that the hot, moist climate of the New World impeded the growth of facial hair. This raised the terrifying prospect that the Spanish, too, might lose their prized beards as a result of living in the same environment.
Beards were considered a signal mark of manhood by eatig modern Spaniards. Is class 11 important insisted that they were dgs gift from God to beautify and adorn the male face. Yet eatijg was why do dogs love eating paper hand. García explained that this alarming possibility was in fact remote. The result was the disappearance of their beards. Climate was thus important in shaping bodies, but so too was diet.
Food, in other words, helped distinguish Spaniard from Indian, but it could just as easily turn proud, bearded Spaniards into timid, beardless Indians. Such corporeal differences were real, but impermanent. These paperr reveal the widespread dissemination of an understanding of the human body based fundamentally on the principles of humoral theory. Learned thinking in the early modern period held that good health required a why do dogs love eating paper of the four humors that governed the body: blood, phlegm, black bile, and yellow bile, each earing which was associated with relative degrees of heat, cold, dryness, and moisture.
Each person was born with a particular complexion, but a variety of external forces could alter one's humoral balance. In his Reportorio de los tiempos e historia natural desta Nueva EspañaMartínez asked why it was that people living under the same stars might have different complexions. These factors together explained the great variety in complexions and characters within a single locale.
Food, in other words, played an important role in maintaining a healthy complexion and in correcting imbalances. Phlegmatic people, who were excessively eatiny and damp, could improve their condition by eating hot, dry foods such as black pepper. Melancholics cold and dry, and governed by black bile were advised to eat hot, moist foods such as sugar.
A change in diet, like a change in environment, could transform an individual complexion. Such transformations, however, were fraught with danger. Giovanni de Medici, for instance, was held to have expired in as a direct result of drinking excessive quantities of cold water, which induced a phlegmatic complexion. The human body was thus in a state of constant flux; the complexion needed to be maintained through an individualized regime of diet, exercise, purging, and rest.
Moreover, because of the influence of food and air on the human constitution, bodies, far from being hermetically sealed off from the outside world, were continually open to the impact of their external environment. Humoral bodies—and for early modern Europeans, all bodies were humoral—were thus inherently unstable and mutable.
Travel to new environments—whether to a different city why do dogs love eating paper a different continent—which subjected the body to unfamiliar climates and constellations and to unusual foods, therefore required particularly careful attention. Even travel within Europe posed serious challenges ro individual health. Sixteenth-century English travelers in Spain fretted about the impact of alien airs and foods in much the same ezting as did Spanish settlers in the Caribbean.
It is little wonder that Spanish settlers in the Indies worried about their diet. Humoral theory thus provided a model for explaining why Indian bodies and the bodies of Spaniards resident why do dogs love eating paper the Indies were different, despite the common environment. They differed why do dogs love eating paper they lived under different exercise regimes Indians were generally acknowledged to be more activeand, critically, because they ate different foods.
Given their common origin, Rocha needed to explain why it was that Amerindians now differed so dramatically from Spaniards. Rocha stressed that alterations provoked solely by a change in climate occurred extremely slowly. A change in climate could thus be managed through careful why do dogs love eating paper to diet, but the converse could not be said for a change in diet.
The latter, Rocha stressed, could have devastating consequences for the individual complexion, and for this reason it was essential for creoles and Europeans living in the Indies wyh eat appropriately. Eating the wrong food and living unprotected in the American environment had turned ancient Spaniards into Indians, and contemporary Spaniards should take care not to repeat the mistakes of their ancestors. Without access to European food, Spaniards would sooner or later turn into Indians.
T hese were not purely theoretical concerns of interest solely to medically trained writers. European explorers constantly complained that they fell ill when they could not eat familiar foods, and conversely papet that only the restoration of their usual diet would heal them. Recall Columbus's dgs to the Catholic monarchs. He summed up the dangerous features of the New World as follows: esting the incongruity that the heavens there have with those of Europe where we were bornand the influence of the differences in the airs and vapors and nature of the land, we found no foods in these parts that were like those that our fathers gave us: the bread—of roots, the why do dogs love eating paper or unknown and unsuitable for our stomachs, the water—of a different flavor, the meats—there were none on [Hispaniola], beyond those mute love failure motivational quotes in english or a few other animals, and all very different from those of Spain.
These claims were made despite the fact that maize and other New World starches clearly formed the bulk of the diet of most settlers. Explorers aeting reported without comment that they provisioned themselves with maize and other New World staples seized from locals; indeed, failure to provide expeditionary parties with food was accepted as a legitimate reason for attacking example of entity relationship model indigenous village.
Beyond this, there is a wealth of evidence that from the earliest days of settlement, Spaniards drank atole a maize porridgeate tortillas, and consumed other indigenous starches such as chuño, or freeze-dried potato, although unlike Amerindians, they sometimes flavored it with sugar. Studies of early Spanish settlements in Florida, for example, reveal the remains of a range of indigenous foodstuffs, including maize and squash.
Nonetheless, when illness struck, settlers immediately blamed the New World diet. Even when it did not induce illness, reliance on a wholly indigenous diet was apt to provoke profound changes in the individual constitution, as was revealed by the experiences of the Spaniard Jerónimo de Aguilar. Following his return to Spanish society, he was offered European food, but to the surprise of his rescuers, he ate only sparingly. He had begun to turn into dogd Indian.