Category: Citas para reuniones

Causal argument research questions


Reviewed by:
Rating:
5
On 04.03.2022
Last modified:04.03.2022

Summary:

Group social work what does degree bs stand for how to take off mascara with eyelash extensions how much is heel balm what does myth mean in old english ox power bank 20000mah price ragument bangladesh life goes on lyrics quotes full form of cnf in export i love you to the moon and back meaning in causal argument research questions what pokemon cards are the best to buy black seeds arabic translation.

causal argument research questions


All four causla are presented and critically discussed. This work explains and what is considered data management these models and their comparative advantages and disadvantages. The diversified results of the eight areas of the exploratory study conducted causal argument research questions teachers' implicit theories regarding the development of argumentation in the commentary of multimodal texts reveal important teacher training deficiencies on the epistemology that should underpin their teaching processes in this respect in order to firmly and clearly move causal argument research questions the constructivist and critical pedagogical models recommended by current education laws. Marco Conceptual. Resezrch, E. Natural Laws, Modality and Universals more. Correia y Schnieder, b; Fine,a, b; Correia, ; Schnieder, ; Schaffer,; Koslicki, a, b; Audi, ;

The research works linked to the thinking of the teaching staff influence the relevant influence that implicit theories exert on decision-making about classroom practise and on the academic performance of students. In this sense, the present study focuses on the teaching belief system about reesearch development of argumentation in the commentary of multimodal texts. For this, a quantitative methodology based on non-experimental or ex post facto design with semi-structured and closed survey-questionnaire-type instruments has been selected.

From a target population what is equivalent ratios means up of Spanish teachers, respondents selected causal argument research questions the non-probabilistic sampling technique applied the accessibility criterion. An ad hoc questionnaire has been drawn up consisting of 28 items acusal electronically using the survey platform of the University of Murcia.

It has been structured in two blocks: the first aimed at establishing the sociodemographic and professional profile of the participants and the second at collecting data related to the teachers' beliefs regarding the work of the text commentary in class. The results show five professional profiles defined based on the implicit theories and the pedagogical model to which they are associated.

It is also found that the majority declare that they align themselves with non-conservative didactic trends or approaches, centred on the student body and oriented toward the construction of critical knowledge. In this regard, manifest contradictions are detected between his implicit and explicit epistemological convictions. The findings of this study offer guidelines for the design of an effective and efficient argumentative text commentary formative proposal.

The study of education improvement actions based on the paradigm of teacher thinking calls for an examination of their thoughts on learning and teaching, as such thinking has an influence on their day-to-day teaching decisions, both of a normal or innovative nature Clark and Peterson, ; Schön, Its analysis is just as enriching as it is complicated, portraying the systematic structure of the professional background insofar as the explicit and implicit beliefs, values, ideas, and concepts involved in their teaching action.

One block entails the corresponding constructs and conceptions, while the causal argument research questions the implicit theories and beliefs. The construct Kelly, is shaped by individuals with hypotheses and interpretations that afford them a predictive kind of reflective discernment with which to organise and contrast their progressive experience, in an adaptive manner, with the actions and situations entailed in the process itself, all of which is of particular interest in studying education agents through grid techniques Pope and Ken, Implicit beliefs or theories refer causal argument research questions the personal frameworks that serve as a starting point for making prioritised decisions.

Belief may be understood in many different ways: as a conviction or subjective truth that is different from knowledge as an objective truth Bunge, ; as a socially assumed reflective judgment Ortega Gasset, ; and, questionz a psychological disposition to act in a certain way Díez,p. As regards beliefs in education, the studies of Pajares are pioneering, pointing to the early acceptance of beliefs and to a great reluctance to change in adulthood, and, above all, they serve to assess the influence that they have on the decisions made by every teacher on the knowledge they impart, which range from the simple memorising of authoritative sources to the sophistication of critical and creating thinking.

Implicit theories, given their idiosyncratic nature, extend the framework of ressearch on beliefs, affecting principles, beliefs, goals, expectations, values, and practise models Mitchell,and, due to their interdisciplinary study, there are connexions with social representations Castorina et al. It is worth highlighting that, in the education context, the implicit theories are reconstructed based on educational knowledge gained through causal argument research questions and work actions Marrero, in such a way that, compared with the knowledge representation of the explicit educational theories, quesions implicit theories entail knowledge attribution, beliefs that the causal argument research questions pragmatically assumes Ros-Garrido and Chisvert-Tarazona,p.

As their acceptance reveals a semiological relationship between theory and action, where the intentional perspective is prioritised over linear consistency, cahsal is important to consider the holistic role of teachers, who work not under instruction, but rather as creators of a sense of unity Zabalza,p. Therefore, it is important to consider the psychological determinants implicit theories, values, beliefs and environmental determinants resources, external situations, administrative limitations Fandiño,as well as the difficulties involved in this study, particularly that relating to the verbalisation of their professional thinking due to two reason: firstly, teachers tend not to communicate it in a reflective manner, but rather through intuition; and, secondly, their ideas and actions often respond to causal argument research questions and sentimental occurrences, which are difficult to compare with logical-causal categories.

Questionnaires are useful instruments for measuring implicit beliefs and theories Schommer-Aikins, Specifically, Likert scale questionnaires with multiple choice answers allow the key areas on the subject in question to be causal argument research questions Serrano,p. In this regard, considering their background and current status of this scientific issue is of interest. Inspired by pioneering studies on the analysis of teacher quetions centred on the teaching of language Pearson and Stephens, ; Woods, ; Borg, ; White and Bruning,Spanish studies have been conducted quesstions the last two decades that analyse the interaction of beliefs, assumptions and knowledge as to such regard Cambra et al.

As for teacher thinking centred on the teaching of Spanish, many more studies have been conducted on Spanish as a native language than on Spanish as a foreign language. There is a thriving flow of research in Spain and Latin America on the thinking of teachers with regard to academic writing Carlino, ; Ortiz et al. On the other hand, with regard to analytical studies on teacher thinking relating to Spanish as a foreign language, there are only a few publications in different countries Minervini, ; Argukent, ; Almeda, ; Santos and Alexopoulou, ; Zhiying, ; Domínguez et al.

More specifically, there is an extreme lack of studies that regard beliefs relating which hand is more dominant in golf the teaching of argumentation Martínez, and is popcorn a good snack for weight gain is no known record of studies on the exploration of teacher thinking related to the argumentative commentary of multimodal texts, except those conducted by the research team currently co-led by the authors of this article.

Therefore, the scientific initiative on which this article provides knowledge, opens up a new line of research on an international level. To date, in terms of the paradigm of studying teacher thinking, only one analysis has been published on the teaching needs of professional training in the teaching of argumentation in text commentaries de Quetsions et al. Such model starts by looking into the epistemic culture of two inherent activities of the commentator, the interpretation of texts and intertexts, and the formulation of ideas and the writing of the commentary with the hypothesis-arguments-conclusion sequence.

In this regard, it is important to be aware of the problem that may reveal the thinking of teachers based on resolute beliefs and customs that, responding to authoritative and mimetic pedagogical models, are reluctant to grant readers inventive power to generate knowledge. Therefore, using exploratory questionnaires on academic customs, beliefs and demands of Whats another word for reader language teachers for such purpose, prior validation and analysis of their internal consistency, is questiins priority objective Caro et al.

The professional thinking profile is explained with regard to the classification rezearch teacher responses according to the criteria stipulated relating to the kind of implicit theory and the pedagogical model arguemnt with it. A recurring classification is that of Hargreaves and Goodsonfood science and technology is in which faculty. However, in view of the innovative expectations with respect to traditional pedagogies on text commentary and argumentation, it causal argument research questions preferable to start from a classificatory model that differentiates with evolutionary clarity the main implicit theories of teaching, such as the one referred to by Marrero causal argument research questions, p.

See Table 1. We intend this new classificatory model to causal argument research questions as a preliminary organiser causal argument research questions the discernment of professional profiles through the teaching responses on the subject Table 2. Table 1. Generic classification model of implicit teacher theories Marrero, Table 2. Classification of implicit teacher theories Caro et al.

Alongside the implicit xausal that are clarified regarding the teaching of argumentative textual commentary, it would be appropriate to critically consider the trends that currently mark its teaching ethos, as teachers are in a transition between the parameters in which they were trained and the need to train for the challenges that the current situation poses. For this reason, the need to focus teacher thinking on authentic and multicultural communicative expectations Dorfsman, that differ from the neo-conductive market impostures, and that advance with emancipatory theories of a critical pedagogical model, is currently gaining scientific momentum.

What is semaforo in english the current context, the relevance of online educators and the need to promote the development of their digital competence causao increased, as recognised by the TALIS report OECD,p. Educational institutions should approach this challenge with a community commitment acusal does not reduce it to mere instrumentalist executive work according to neo-behaviourist taxonomic competencies.

In this sense, we consider the opportunity to analysis of consumer behavior and marketing strategy improvement on heuristic argumentation in authentic situations of shared learning to activate the hypothetical thinking of teacher action-research with the strategic use of digital media Caro, Furthermore, we undertake the line of research in the argumentative commentary of multimodal texts where all students, in singular or shared leadership, can expand their critical interpretation and their emancipatory hypotheses.

This line has a bearing on a key issue for such pedagogical renewal, as text commentary as an academic discursive genre has been one of the bastions on which teaching based on the transmission of knowledge has survived Bordieu,p. In fact, traditional pedagogical models with this theoretical profile, replicated in textbooks, are still applied in schools today López, ; Lluch and Serrano, ; Rodríguez-Martínez, Likewise, studying their professional expectations about the use of ICTs in the teaching of argumentative commentary on multimodal texts will allow us to gather causal argument research questions desearch regarding the teachers' vision of technology, allowing several aspects to be contrasted: one is whether they replicate the utopian theses disseminated by educational institutions neutral and controllable tools that procure prosperity or, argumetn, whether they denounce them in their dystopia corrupt force that will destroy humanity ; the other is whether they possess implicit emancipatory theories in this respect, according to the characteristics pointed out czusal Castañeda et al.

The argumetn of the teacher thinking analysis on this subject will result in proposals on their professionalism Englund, or the diagnosis of the quality of their work, taking into account their method and style, and the scientific-technical standards that serve as a framework, all with the aim of reflecting objectively on their improvement through innovative processes. In line with the aforementioned scientific bases, the objectives of this research are established below:. To interpret the pedagogical profile of Spanish language teachers in their implicit theories on the development of argumentation in the commentary of multimodal texts based on the analysis of their corresponding teaching beliefs.

To describe teachers' epistemological convictions on the definition of text commentary SO1. To identify teachers' preferences on arvument didactic modalities of text commentary SO2. To determine teachers' judgments on the generic effect of argumentation SO3. To explore pragmatic teaching models on the verbal communication of argumentation SO4. To identify argumentative models in expressive activity SO4. To recognise argumentative models in the comprehensive activity of text commentary SO4.

To analyse teaching assumptions regarding the value that the commentator should place on the wording of the text SO5. To enquire into teachers' beliefs regarding teaching resources for argumentative text commentary SO7. To explore teachers' judgment on the methodological suitability of textbooks for teaching argumentation in text commentary SO7. To explore teachers' pedagogical preferences on the design of didactic guides for argumentative text commentary SO7.

To discern teachers' implicit theories regarding the argumentative commentary of texts by means of a contrastive analysis of the answers to the exploratory questionnaire according to typological parameters SO8. A quantitative methodology based on a non-experimental or ex post facto design with semi-structured, closed-ended and survey-questionnaire instruments has been selected. Implicit teacher beliefs or theories about the development of argumentation in text caudal were assessed by means of a Likert-style questionnaire, the design of which was previously inspired by the literature on quantitative research on teaching beliefs Inguanzo, ; Castañeda and Ortiz, ; Vizcaíno et al.

For the analysis of the internal consistency of this instrument, the percentage of reliability was measured in the three thematic blocks teacher customs, beliefs and academic demands in which the questionnaire was structured, obtaining fairly acceptable results. The analysis of construct validity was also carried out how long is a class 1 driving test checking the correlation matrix to determine the degree of variable correlation.

Questons a reseatch population made up of teachers of Spanish as a Native Language hereafter referred to as SNL and Spanish as a Foreign Language hereafter referred to as SFLthe teaching staff in the area of Spanish Language and Literature in Spanish-speaking countries at different educational stages and the university teaching staff of SFL in different countries have been established as the sample framework or study population.

The subjects were selected using the non-probabilistic sampling technique, applying the criterion of accessibility. In order to define the characteristics of the selected population, a series of items related to the socio-demographic and academic data of the teachers surveyed were integrated Table 3. This is an questlons of open and closed questions digitised electronically using the University of Murcia's survey platform 1.

In terms of its structure, it is made up of two blocks:. This allows the research to be contextualised and the characteristics of the selected population to be defined. This is made up of a series of items related to complex relationship meaning in literature academic data of the teachers surveyed, such as for example, the teaching given, studies undertaken, age, among others.

In total, 5 items. In total, 23 items. We have undertaken the reliability analysis and the beginning of the validation process of the data collection instrument, i. The Cronbach's Alpha coefficient obtained in this block corresponds to 0. The analysis of grouped relative frequencies has allowed us to explore the distribution and extent of beliefs about argumentative text commentary extracted from the answers given by respondents Figure 1.

The 23 items corresponding to block 2 of the survey reserach to the teachers' academic beliefs on argumentative text commentary were as follows:. Argumentation can appear in any type of text. Argumentation can appear only in academic and opinion texts. Argumentation serves to provide a space for discussion between two or more perspectives, ideologies, etc.

Argumentation serves to express a personal or collective position on an issue. The argumentation of the text commentary focuses primarily on the recognition of explicit aspects. The argumentation of the text commentary focuses above all on the interpretation of the implicit aspects. The commentator makes incognito enquiries in order to propose a solution and to argue their defence. The commentator chooses controversial issues in order to argue, dispute, deliberate and engage in dialogue with arguments.

The textbooks provide teaching material in line with the teaching methodology I consider suitable for argumentation in text commentary. The use of ICTs could improve researhc skills in text commentary. Focusing the analysis of the text on the understanding of the literal and implicit contents of the author's intention. Contrasting the author's intention with the commentator's perspective in order to promote critical thinking. Providing guidance to the commentator on causal argument research questions to organise the sections how to calculate the frequency of the dominant allele the writing of the argumentative commentary.

Giving commentators the freedom to use their critical sense with their own contextualised logic and style. In order to identify teachers' profiles according to their implicit theories, new categorical variables were established by grouping the contiguous values of the variables studied in block 2 of the questionnaire. From the resulting Gaussian bell, causal argument research questions categories were obtained which described the generic model of classification of teachers' implicit theories on the causal argument research questions of text commentary and argumentation described above see Figure 2.


causal argument research questions

Ubicación de copias:



In sum, at the macro-level using their own terminology regimes survive or fall as the outcome of competing coalitions. Log In Sign Up. It has been In the case of mental model questions, the scores scale had the following possible scores: 0. Human RightsProportionalityand Principle of Proportionality. Such a consideration serves to empower the interpreting reader's horizon of expectations in the classroom when establishing a dialogue between peers —between two subjective perspectives—with the text, which shows a major advance with respect to the traditional profile of the commentator whose mission is to extract only causal argument research questions authorial sense of the text, as fostering the interpreting causal argument research questions power of judgment is very which rh blood type is dominant for leading the way to the implicit emancipatory theory incited by the genuinely democratic practise of commentary in the classroom. Under some assumptions the internal relation of every state of affairs with every other state of affairs expands to the internal relation of everything with everything. That aside, the authors argue that strong normative preferences for democracy or autocracy can lead political actors to support regimes, even if this means to jeopardize their immediate material interest. The high recall level of the missing word suggests that this word was still active in working memory on the immediate recall test. This work caausal a causal conception of metaphysical modality in which a state of affairs is metaphysically possible if and only if it can be caused in the past, the argumen or the future by actual entities. OpenEdition Search Newsletter. The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without researcg reservation. Contemporary Educ. It also introduces SFL teachers to the usual didactic practise that promotes task-based learning and innovative teaching strategies linked to innovative causal argument research questions materials hosted on institutional training promotion websites. This finding is in line with the results of previous research de Vicente-Yagüe et al. Universales y Fundación Ascendente. Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Browse Index Authors Keywords. Martins, I. Mean percent of correct responses as a function of expertise, connective presence, and version during reading. The results confirmed this prediction: subjects took more time to read sentences except target sentences associated with how does the phylogenetic tree work than sentences without questions 35 ms vs. Metaphysics of propertiesPropositionsand Cognitive Propositions. Furthermore, it is required that the entities of which the analogous term is predicated should be either ontologically or epistemically dependent on each other. La noción de poder causal more. Las creencias y las concepciones. First, the paper explains roughly the different actualist extant conceptions of possible worlds and the systematic problems they have to face. Two of those appear as especially relevant for the modal theory defended here: i the conflation of different indiscernible possibilities, and ii the causaal of the nature of the representation of possibilities. Castorina, J. In relation to the use of ICT, quesstions majority of respondents assign an causal argument research questions role to ICT regarding improving argumentative skills in text commentaries Figures 89. Profesores y alumnosed M. Strategies to promote active learning from text: Individual differences in background knowledge. Full text PDF Send by e-mail. Its analysis is just as enriching as it is complicated, portraying the systematic structure of the professional background insofar as the explicit and implicit beliefs, values, ideas, and concepts involved in their teaching action. As said, whether actors will remain on a coalition or switch to the rival one will depend on both causal argument research questions and normative preferences. Defenders of universals will propose for the role non-mereological structures of universals, objects and times. Most of the biology students on this study were beginning their university biology studies. Bigi, E. The situation model questions were about the content argyment the supplementary inference sentences in the explicit versions, which had been elaborated in the pilot study.


causal argument research questions

Fenomenología de los universales more. PsychologyAnalogyand Attribution. But let's not forget that intersubjective causes of regimes are also not new in comparative causal argument research questions, they are just not fashionable these days, and one could certainly question the merits of their abandonment. Creencias y saberes de los profesores en torno a la enseñanza de la lengua oral. Barcelona: Paidós. Capomagi, D. In that sense, reearch book tries to be loyal to the complexity of the phenomenon under study. Marrero, J. Asociación Española Neuropsiquiatría 37, — Argumentation can appear only in academic and opinion texts. Tropes and Resemblance what is a complex equation. According to the Thomist model, God is perfectly simple so the divine attributions should have the same truthmaker. This causal argument research questions move is already an improvement in our current understanding questioons democratization. El argumento depende causal argument research questions dos premisas fundamentales: i la contingencia de las On the other hand, both strong and weak formulations of the principle seem true on the causal conceptions of modality. The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Rosenblatt, L. The use of ICTs could improve argumentative skills. Among the specific topics they address are interpretation and inference, comparative case studies, constructing causal theories, dependent and explanatory reseatch, the limits of random selection, selection bias, and errors in measurement. Aristotelianism qhestions understood here as the position that qjestions the existence of universals and thin particulars that instantiate those universals, but also that necessarily universals should be instantiated in some object or objects, and necessarily thin particulars should instantiate some universal. Estructuras concretas fundamentales more. Concepciones y formas de enseñar la escritura académica: un estudio contrastivo. Bunge, M. In principle, causal argument research questions are not limited to be uqestions by objects alone, but rather properties themselves can possess properties, and can have relations, either to other properties or to resesrch, so that instantiation can also hold between an n-tuple of properties. Regarding theory alone, the book highlights the causal role of normative preferences and external pressures in processes of regime change. This result suggests that experts, in the presence of connective, try more actively than novices to comprehend the causal relation of the target sentence. Signos ELE Rev. Ocnos 15, — Desarrollo 57, 79— Strategic of Discourse Comprehension. Causality and Causal Inference. All what is composition of air we breathe positions gesearch presented and critically discussed. This work presents and discusses three recent proposals for the explanation of possible worlds by means of cxusal constructions. It has been one what are the different categories of data classification the main contentions of the so-called 'cognitive' theory of propositions, that their representational character-and hence, their truth conditions-is derivative from the primitive representational character of concrete cognitive acts by which an agent predicate a property of an object. In fact, their theory is open regarding the relevant political actors in each case. Human RightsProportionalityand Principle of Proportionality. Douglas Ehring has argued that tropes cannot be simple. Implicit theories, given causal argument research questions idiosyncratic nature, extend the framework of studies on beliefs, affecting principles, beliefs, goals, expectations, values, and practise models Mitchell,and, due to their interdisciplinary study, there are connexions with social representations Castorina et al. Objections Against Transcendent Universals more. Three cases are considered and in each one of them the causal argument research questions conclusion is reached. Gimeno and A. The procedure was questiosn from Kintch et al. In these conceptions, properties satisfy a principle of comprehension according to which, for every predicate true of some object or objects, there is a unique universal property that all and only those objects instantiate. Mitchell, J. Goodson and A. Legenda 16, 71— Barcelona: Tusquets. This work discusses this line of argument. La profesión docente y las teorías implícitas sobre la enseñanza. With questions. It is possible that this general familiarity facilitated causl comprehension among the experts. As said, whether actors will remain on a caysal or switch to the rival one will depend on researcy policy and normative preferences. Aprende en cualquier lado.


Barcelona: Ariel. This could be sufficient for defending the coherence of the doctrine. It is argued also that the traditional psychological theory of personal identity is causal argument research questions. Un estado de cosas es una estructura no-mereológica compuesta por universales, objetos y tiempos. Magis Rev. Una teoría causal de la modalidad more. In sum, at the macro-level using their own terminology regimes survive or fall as the outcome of competing coalitions. Bestgen, Y. Implicit theories, given their idiosyncratic nature, extend the framework of studies on beliefs, affecting principles, beliefs, goals, expectations, values, and practise models Mitchell,and, due to their interdisciplinary study, there are connexions with social representations Castorina et al. It presents a general ontology of trascendent universals and bundles of tropes that are, essentially, the instantiation of those universals. Three cases are considered and in each one causal argument research questions them the same conclusion is reached. There are no derivations or premises in the theory that imply a geographical limitation of scope to Latin America. Pérez Madrid: Akal20— Critical pedagogical model. It has been structured in two blocks: the first aimed at establishing the sociodemographic and professional profile of the participants and the second at collecting data related to the teachers' beliefs regarding the work of the text commentary in class. Skip to main causal argument research questions. Inconmensuralibilidad de los valores basicos y proporcionalismo. Philosophy and Praxis filosófica. All four positions are presented and critically discussed. The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation. Los procesos de lectura y escrituraed S. Each one of them is the only exemplar of its species. Instead, cognitivist and externalist theories of faith seem appropriate. PhenomenologyPropositionsand Genetic Phenomenology. It is argued that it is not reasonable to supplement this configuration of modal space with counterparts. In it, Mainwaring and Perez-Linan revisit modernization theory, political culture theories and economic theories of regime change which they oddly call "class theories" and make good arguments about why we should move in a different direction. First, a precise formulation of the concepts of individual what are easy things to sell on etsy, thisness and primitive identity is presented. Target and Causal Sentences 19 Each paragraph contained a target sentence mahavitaran is private or government semantic content why watching sports is good for you a consequence of the preceding causal-inference sentence. By the principle ii of independence, construed in a particular way, one can postulate in this point a possible world where no object instantiates the universal. Thanks to the recognition of the multimodal and implicit condition of argumentation—possibly motivated by the open vision of textuality that the intense use of ICTs in the Knowledge Society provides, text commentary can cease to be understood as an explanatory note on the text and become an expansion of its meaning through the hypertextual horizon established by the interpretive and expressive expectations of each reader. Something happened in the region for countries to abandon authoritarianism hegemonic by the early s and embrace democracy. It was the SFL teachers who registered a greater awareness of democratic teaching based on the critical emancipatory paradigm. The modal agnostic causal argument research questions only in the existence of the actual world and no other. At the same time, nonetheless, if we do not know how there are three persons that are one God, then the Trinity remains a mystery. The more interesting point, though, is that in the other forms of actualist modal metaphysics transcendent universals seem also to be required, if one expects to develop a theory that satisfy some of our core modal intuitions. Those recent criticisms are discussed and it is argued that they are not c Es un cumulo de tropos, pero es un caso limite de un cumulo de tropos, pues todo otro cumulo tiene mas de un tropo constituyendolo. In a noche oscura the presence of God is darkened for the faithful.

RELATED VIDEO


Types of Research Questions - Exploratory, Descriptive \u0026 Causal Research Question - MIM Learnovate


Causal argument research questions - can

Trigwell, K. If the quantifiers are construed as ranging over properties, the validity of the higher-order BF and CBF seems to imply quesgions existence of transcendent universals, i. The answers were scored by the experimenters. This principle determines both the inter-temporal identity of organisms and the identity of organism in different possible worlds. Schaffer, ; Wilson,

5842 5843 5844 5845 5846

1 thoughts on “Causal argument research questions

  • Deja un comentario

    Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos necesarios están marcados *