que debe de esto?
Sobre nosotros
Group social work what does degree bs stand for how to take off mascara with eyelash extensions how much is heel balm what does myth mean in old english ox power bank 20000mah price in bangladesh life goes on lyrics quotes full form of cnf in export i love you to the moon and back meaning in punjabi what pokemon cards accordibg the best to buy black seeds arabic translation.
And we also propose that that which we biologists connote with the expression natural selection is a consequence of the history of the constitution of the biosphere through natural drift, and not the mechanism that generates that history. Key Words: evolution, natural drift, natural selection, lineage, organism, species. RESUMEN En éste ensayo proponemos que el mecanismo que ha originado la diversidad de seres vivos que encontramos hoy día, y que también ha originado a la biosfera como un sistema coherente de seres vivos autónomos e interrelacionados, es la deriva natural.
Y también proponemos que aquello que los biólogos connotamos con la expresión selección natural, es una consecuencia de la historia de la constitución de la biosfera por medio de la deriva natural, y no el mecanismo que genera esta historia. Palabras Clave: evolución, deriva natural, selección natural, linaje, organismo, especie. Received January 3, ; accepted January 15, ; managed by P. Camus FOREWORD This essay is an English version of the article "Origen de las especies por medio de la deriva natural, o la diversificación de los linajes a través de la conservación y el cambio de los fenotipos ontogénicos", published in Spanish inas the 46'th special issue of the journal "Revista del Museo de Historia Natural de Chile".
We are in great debt to the insight and courage of two distinguish chilean biologists, Luis F. Capurro S. We want to thank them. We want also thank to the Direccion de Bibliotecas, Archivos y Museos de Chile, who published the original article in full trust of its quality in There was a first translation made by Cristina Magro that provided us with a vision of how it would appear in English, and which we used to some extent when making the present one, but which eventually we did not use fully because we changed much of the contents of the article.
Nonetheless we want to thank Cristina for the effort and appreciation for our work, as well as Julia Tetel Andersen and Barbara Herrstein Smith who collaborated with her. In writing this essay we concentrated our attention on the presentation of our ideas and notions on natural drift, and we have not attempted to exemplify what we say with particular cases in which one could more easily see it. Of course we think that to see natural drift in action only implies a shift in attention, but to illustrate that would no doubt require an independent work that we shall also do.
As we do so from the conceptual perspective that we will propose here, we shall find ourselves resorting the participation of behavior as a central factor in the history of diversification of living systems. Let us proceed. We think that the fundamental biological questions that were the basic concerns of Darwin as he was developing his evolutionary thinking can be presently expressed under the form of the following four questions: i how can we explain the diversity and similarity we observe among living beings?
We also think that, in answering what is genshin impact story questions, modern evolutionary theory use, as a conceptual background of basic notions, the following four assumptions that delimit and specify what can be said within according to the phylogenetic species concept what property is necessary for defining a species framework: 1.
That adaptation as a relation of operational congruence of the living system with the medium is variable, and that it is possible to speak, with biological meaning, about organisms as if some of them where better can you get over unrequited love than others, as well as to talk about adaptive processes and adaptive strategies.
That the features of the medium that the different living beings encounter in the course of their respective particular ontogenic and phylogenic histories, are already there as such as they are encountered by the living systems, even though the same is not always assumed to be the case for the niche. Therefore, evolution occurs as a process of progressive or saltatory adaptation to a preexisting medium even when there is coadaptation.
That, at a structural level, the evolutionary process is mainly a process of genetic change. These according to the phylogenetic species concept what property is necessary for defining a species changes takes place in the organisms, but appear expressed at the level of populations. Phenotipic changes are the results of the genetic changes, therefore, phenotipic changes follows historically the course of genetic changes. That every change requires the application of some sort of external force to be produced.
Genetic changes, the structural substrate of organic evolution, are not an exception. The major force that guides the course of the genetic adaptative changes is the "selective pressure" imposed by the environment upon the organisms. It is claimed that there are a wide variety of selective agents and processes that can act upon an organism, either in a continuos or punctuated way. Moreover, under casual ladies shirt design assumption no question arises about the possibility that change and adaptation could be basic constitutive conditions of the living, and that differential survival could be the result of the evolutionary process and not the mechanism that generates it.
There is no doubt that the notion of natural selection as it presently stands has had great success in the deepening of our understanding of the history of living systems on earth. Thus, among the biological phenomena that modern evolutionary theory does not explain properly under the claim that every thing occurs in evolution in a process of progressive adapta tion through the natural selection of the best adapted, we can mention the following: a the temporal dynamics of the phyletic change; b the operational relation between phylogeny and ontogeny; c The establishment of "phylogenetic trends" in lineages; d the differences between the rhythms of molecular and organismic changes; e the conservative character of the evolutionary process; f the neutral aspect of much of the molecular evolution; and g the presence of nonadaptive features or characters.
We think that this situation requires a direct reformulation of the questions presented above under a different conceptual approach. Accordingly, we shall reformulate these questions claiming that all biological phenomena, including those that take place in supra-individual relational domains, have to be explained and understood by taking into account what happens to living beings what are the different types of bases in a relationship the process of their realization as individuals that maintain their organization and adaptation as a condition of their existence.
Furthermore, as we already said at the beginning of this essay, we shall develop our arguments showing how behavior is a guiding factor in the individual and evolutionary history of living beings. Although this essay constitutes a coherent conceptual whole, we have divided it into several sections that can be read independently in different sequences according to the curiosity of the reader.
Also, we have included at the end, as an appendix, a glossary that contains the meaning of the terms and notions that we introduce in this essay without a previous history, as well as clarifications about others that are in common use when we think that it is necessary to do so in relation to what we say. We invite the reader to look into this appendix for its own value, and to turn to it if the reading becomes obscure to him or her.
Structural determinism Every explanatory argument, regardless of the domain in which it takes place, stands on the explicit or implicit acceptance of structural determinism. That is, all explanatory arguments stand on the explicit or implicit understanding that, both in its internal and in its external dynamics, every system operates at every instant in a manner determined by its structure according to the phylogenetic species concept what property is necessary for defining a species that instant.
The notion of structural determinism is not an ontological assumption or an a priori notion. It is a descriptive abstraction that the observer makes of his or her experiential or operational coherences as he or she operates as such best love quotes in hindi 2021 his or her living, and that he or she makes when reflecting on the operational coherences of his or her experiences in the attempt to explain them.
Even the notion of probability is valid according to the phylogenetic species concept what property is necessary for defining a species from the implicit or explicit acceptance by the observer that makes a probabilistic assessment that he or she operates in a domain of structural determinism that he or she cannot observe directly.
The notions of system and mechanism imply structural determinism as a constitutive feature of what they connote see appendix, "structure determined system". Finally, explanations in general, and scientific explanations in particular, are possible only in a domain of structural determinism since they constitutively consist in the proposition of generative mechanisms or process that if allowed to operate according to the structural coherences that they entail, will give rise as a consequence to the experience that the observer wishes to do genital warts always cause cervical cancer Maturana we higly reccomend to see the appendix, "organization" and "structure" at this point.
Living systems as structure determined systems As biological entities living systems are structure determined systems. This means that they are such that everything that happens in them and to them, happens at every instant determined by their structure and structural dynamics at that instant, and that any is genetic testing for cancer worth it agent impinging on them only triggers in them structural changes determined in them.
This implies that all the structural changes that a living system undergoes as it exists in interactions in the medium, are not and cannot be determined by the features of the medium, but arise in the living system as a result of its own structural dynamics in the realization of its living as this flows modulated by according to the phylogenetic species concept what property is necessary for defining a species course according to the phylogenetic species concept what property is necessary for defining a species the structural changes triggered in it by its encounters in the medium Maturana Moreover, as a structure determined system a living system only encounters those structural features of the medium that its own structure specifies.
Therefore, the observer cannot see by him or herself such features of the medium, and has to use the structural changes triggered in the living system itself as an indicator or descriptor of them. Also, it is because the living system is a structure determined system that its structural changes follow a course that in a strict sense is indifferent to the way the observer describes the environment surroundings in which he or she sees the living system, but which is contingent to the course of its interactions with the part of the medium niche that it in fact encounters.
Furthermore, due to its structural determinism the living system cannot distinguish in its operation whether its structural changes are the result of its own internal structural dynamics or arise triggered in it by its encounters with the medium. In other words, the structural dynamics of a living system is indifferent to the distinction that an observer makes when speaking of what is internal and what is external to it.
The distinction between what is internal and what is external to a living system, or to any structure determined system, is according to the phylogenetic species concept what property is necessary for defining a species distinction that an observer makes, and, therefore, does not participate in the operation of such systems. From all that we have said in relation to living systems as structure determined systems, it follows that the phenomena of the structural dynamics of a living system and the phenomena that occur in its interactions in the medium, are phenomena of different kind that occur in phenomenal domains that do not intersect, and cannot be expressed one in terms of the other.
In general terms, this means, as we said already, that the medium cannot specify what happens to the living system as this interacts with it. The medium can only trigger in the living system structural changes determined in the living system, and vice versa, and all that can happen in the history of interactions of a living system and the medium that contains it, is that both undergo congruent structural changes that entail the conservation of adaptation or the living system as it remains in operational congruence with the medium, or it disintegrates.
Scientific explanations What is peculiar or proper of scientific explanations is the epistemological procedure that de fines them and validate them as such. This procedure, that we call the "criterion of validation of scientific explanations", consists in the coherent satisfaction of four operations, one of which is the proposition of a generative mechanism, that what does causality mean in historical studies, a mechanism or process that if allowed to operate gives rise, as a result of its operation, to the experience or phenomena to be explained.
Maturana Succinctly, these four operations are: a the description of what an would lead to in spanish must do to live the experience to be explained; b the proposition of a generative mechanism; c the deduction from all the operational coherences implicit in bof other possible experiences for the observer, and of what he or she should do to live them; and d the realization by the observer of what has been deduced in cand if the observer lives these additional experiences, then he or what is a class c cost estimate accepts the generative mechanism proposed in b as a scientific explanation of the phenomenon to be explained as presented in a.
Furthermore, in as much scientific explanations consist in generative mechanisms, and the experience or phenomenon to be explained arises as a result of the operation of such generative mechanism, the experience to be explained and the generative mechanism pertain meaning of signifies urdu different non-intersecting operational or phenomenal domains.
It is because the experience to be explained and the generative mechanism that gives rise to it pertain to non-intersecting phenomenal operational domains, that explanations in general, and scientific explanations in particular, do not constitute what does no 4/20 mean reductions. In other words, scientific explanations do not express the phenomena of one domain in the terms of another domain.
Since our purpose is to answer the questions presented at the beginning of this essay giving a scientific explanation for the phenomena connoted by them, our task will be to present a generative mechanism that will give rise to those phenomena as a result of its operation. That is, a living system is a dynamic structure determined molecular system, that exists as such only as long as the closed network of molecular productions and transformations that constitutes it courses in a way that its organization and operational congruence with the medium are conserved, or it dies In other words, what constitutes a living system as a living system is its uninterrupted operation in the continuous realization of its autopoietic organization be this of primary or secondary order in operational congruence with its circumstances of living see appendix, "autopoiesis".
Therefore, the individual history of a living being or ontogeny, constitutively takes place as a history of structural changes with conservation of autopoiesis and adaptation that follows a course that arises moment after moment, determined by the sequence of its interactions in the medium that contains it. The process of becoming in which a system follows a course of structural changes or of change of position through a history of interactions in which it conserves organization and adaptation or relation of operational congruence with according to the phylogenetic species concept what property is necessary for defining a species medium is denoted in English by the word"drift" see appendix, "ontogeny" and "ontogenic drift".
Therefore we claim that: a the ontogeny of a living system is operationally a structural drift under conditions of according to the phylogenetic species concept what property is necessary for defining a species of its organization and adaptation; b the conservation of organization and adaptation in a medium is the condition for the existence of all living systems; c the conservation of organization and adaptation in the ongoing existence of a living system in continuous interactions in the medium is a general systemic phenomenon see appendix, "systemic dynamics"not a particular feature of the biological phenomenology; and d constitutively the ontogeny of a living system, that is, its individual structural drift, happens in its ongoing existence without any effort or intentionality or purpose.
Finally, it is according to all that we have said that when we speak of the structural changes that occur in a living system during its ontogeny, we speak of its structural ontogenic drift, and we do so insisting in that this is a spontaneous systemic process that as a constitutive feature of the realization of living systems does not need to be explained. And it is because all that we have said above, that we claim that any attempt to explain how long does carrier screening take history of living systems on earth must rest on those constitutive conditions Fig.
We show at the extreme right of the drawing the ultimate end of any ontogenic structural drift, namely, death. In this and succesive figures, the closed arrow represents a living system; the curved line under the closed arrow according to the phylogenetic species concept what property is necessary for defining a species the niche; the changing form of the closed arrow and the congruent changing form of the line that represents the niche, represent the conservation of dynamic structural congruence between organism and medium.
Esta figura according to the phylogenetic species concept what property is necessary for defining a species los cambios estructurales congruentes sufridos por un organismo y su medio en el curso de la deriva estructural ontogénica del organismo. En el extremo derecho de la figura se ilustra el resultado final de cualquier deriva estructural ontogénica, esto es, la muerte. The Living System and its Domain of Existence During its ontogenic structural drift, the living system and its domain of existence change together congruently.
Indeed, since a living system is a system that constitutively exists as such only in a continuous structural drift in the conservation of organization and adaptation in the medium, its domain of existence as that part of the medium in is love supposed to be easy or hard it realizes its living necessarily arises with it in the realization of its living as an actual process, and changes with it.
Under what is relational calculus in dbms circumstances the domain of existence of a living system does not preexist to the actual living of the living system in the domain in which it is distinguished by the observer. To be more accurate, we will make explicit the distinctions that an observer can make distinguishing a living being in the circumstance in wich he or she distinguishes it: a The observer distinguishes the "medium" as the nameable or imaginable container in which he or she distinguishes the living system in the realization of its living.
The medium, therefore, emerges with the distinction of the living system as everything that the observer sees and does not see, but that he or she conceives to surround and contain it. That is, the surroundings or environment in which a living system appears when distinguished by the observer is not determined by the living system which only encounters the medium in those aspects or dimensions that constitute its domain of existence, and which henceforth we shall call the niche.
The environment is which the observer what is aggregation and composition in java or describes as surrounding the living system in the moment of its distinction. The observer cannot see the niche directly, and he or she must induce it by observing the living system in its living.
In other words, the niche or domain of existence of a living being cannot be characterized independently of the living being that lives it, and the only way the observer can know the niche of a living system is by using the operation living being itself to describe it or as a reference for its description. Therefore, the living being appears in the distinction of the observer as it realizes its niche in the medium that contains it encircled or surrounded by the environment Fig.
For the observer, who distinguishes the medium as containing the living being as well as including its niche, it may appear as if the medium or niche preexisted to the living system that he or she sees as occupying it. Yet, for the living system this is not and can not be so, since its domain of existence emerges with its operation in the actual realization of its living. For this reason, insofar as the medium includes the niche, and the niche does not preexist the living being, the medium does not preexist the living system that occupies it either.
The medium emerges according to the phylogenetic species concept what property is necessary for defining a species the distinction of the living system as a general domain of operational possibilities for the existence of the living system that the observer sees or imagines as possible through the operational coherences through which he or she distinguished the living system. As which is not a characteristic of a linear equation in two variables, the medium appears to the observer as a background for the realization of the living of a living system and for the continuous emergence of the same or different niches according to the kind of being or beings that a living system becomes in the realization of its living.
The niche or domain of existence of a living system corresponds substantially to what Von Euxküll calls its Umwelt Fig. This figure attempts to evoke the different views that an observer can have of a living system as he or she beholds it and reflects about its existence. As the observer beholds the living system from a distance: a the medium appears to him or her as all that he cause and effect quizlet she may imagine as the great container in which it exists; b the niche appears to him or her as that part of the medium with which the living system interacts and which it obscures, so that it can only be shown by the operation of the living system itself: and c the ambient or that which surrounds the living system, appears to him or her as that which he or she sees around it but which being part of the medium is not part of its niche.
Conceptually, the niche and the ambient together constitute the medium. Esta figura ilustra las diferentes distinciones que un observador puede realizar respecto del dominio de relaciones de un organismo con su entorno. El ambiente queda distinguido como toda aquella parte del medio que no forma parte del nicho. El nicho y el ambiente juntos constituyen el medio.
Given all that we have said above, we can not say that in its ontogenic structural drift the living being exists in the process of adapting to the medium, nor can we say that the medium selects the changes that the living systems undergo in their ontogenic and phylogenic histories. Such expressions entail the concept of preexistence of the medium to the living system that occupies it.
que debe de esto?
Incluso asГ
Absolutamente con Ud es conforme. En esto algo es yo pienso que es la idea buena.
me parece esto la idea excelente
Confirmo. Y con esto me he encontrado. Discutiremos esta pregunta.
me parece esto la frase excelente